Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 754, 2024 Jul 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080599

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early detection of outbreaks requires robust surveillance and reporting at both community and health facility levels. Uganda implements Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) for priority diseases and uses the national District Health Information System (DHIS2) for reporting. However, investigations after the first case in the 2022 Uganda Sudan virus outbreak was confirmed on September 20, 2022 revealed many community deaths among persons with Ebola-like symptoms as far back as August. Most had sought care at private facilities. We explored possible gaps in surveillance that may have resulted in late detection of the Sudan virus disease (SVD) outbreak in Uganda. METHODS: Using a standardized tool, we evaluated core surveillance capacities at public and private health facilities at the hospital level and below in three sub-counties reporting the earliest SVD cases in the outbreak. Key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with 12 purposively-selected participants from the district local government. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with community members from six villages where early probable SVD cases were identified. KIIs and FGDs focused on experiences with SVD and Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (VHF) surveillance in the district. Thematic data analysis was used for qualitative data. RESULTS: Forty-six (85%) of 54 health facilities surveyed were privately-owned, among which 42 (91%) did not report to DHIS2 and 39 (85%) had no health worker trained on IDSR; both metrics were 100% in the eight public facilities. Weak community-based surveillance, poor private facility engagement, low suspicion index for VHF among health workers, inability of facilities to analyze and utilize surveillance data, lack of knowledge about to whom to report, funding constraints for surveillance activities, lack of IDSR training, and lack of all-cause mortality surveillance were identified as gaps potentially contributing to delayed outbreak detection. CONCLUSION: Both systemic and knowledge-related gaps in IDSR surveillance in SVD-affected districts contributed to the delayed detection of the 2022 Uganda SVD outbreak. Targeted interventions to address these gaps in both public and private facilities across Uganda could help avert similar situations in the future.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Uganda/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/diagnóstico , Adulto , Sudão/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Febres Hemorrágicas Virais/epidemiologia , Febres Hemorrágicas Virais/diagnóstico
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 543, 2024 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816800

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2022, an Ebola disease outbreak caused by Sudan virus (SUDV) occurred in Uganda, primarily affecting Mubende and Kassanda districts. We determined risk factors for SUDV infection among household members (HHM) of cases. METHODS: We conducted a case-control and retrospective cohort study in January 2023. Cases were RT-PCR-confirmed SUDV infection in residents of Mubende or Kassanda districts during the outbreak. Case-households housed a symptomatic, primary case-patient for ≥ 24 h and had ≥ 1 secondary case-patient with onset < 2 weeks after their last exposure to the primary case-patient. Control households housed a case-patient and other HHM but no secondary cases. A risk factor questionnaire was administered to the primary case-patient or another adult who lived at home while the primary case-patient was ill. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among case-household members and categorized their interactions with primary case-patients during their illnesses as none, minimal, indirect, and direct contact. We conducted logistic regression to explore associations between exposures and case-household status, and Poisson regression to identify risk factors for SUDV infection among HHM. RESULTS: Case- and control-households had similar median sizes. Among 19 case-households and 51 control households, primary case-patient death (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 7.6, 95% CI 1.4-41) and ≥ 2 household bedrooms (ORadj=0.19, 95% CI 0.056-0.71) were associated with case-household status. In the cohort of 76 case-HHM, 44 (58%) were tested for SUDV < 2 weeks from their last contact with the primary case-patient; 29 (38%) were positive. Being aged ≥ 18 years (adjusted risk ratio [aRRadj] = 1.9, 95%CI: 1.01-3.7) and having direct or indirect contact with the primary case-patient (aRRadj=3.2, 95%CI: 1.1-9.7) compared to minimal or no contact increased risk of Sudan virus disease (SVD). Access to a handwashing facility decreased risk (aRRadj=0.52, 95%CI: 0.31-0.88). CONCLUSION: Direct contact, particularly providing nursing care for and sharing sleeping space with SVD patients, increased infection risk among HHM. Risk assessments during contact tracing may provide evidence to justify closer monitoring of some HHM. Health messaging should highlight the risk of sharing sleeping spaces and providing nursing care for persons with Ebola disease symptoms and emphasize hand hygiene to aid early case identification and reduce transmission.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Características da Família , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola , Humanos , Uganda/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/transmissão , Fatores de Risco , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ebolavirus , Lactente
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 520, 2024 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: On 20 September 2022, Uganda declared its fifth Sudan virus disease (SVD) outbreak, culminating in 142 confirmed and 22 probable cases. The reproductive rate (R) of this outbreak was 1.25. We described persons who were exposed to the virus, became infected, and they led to the infection of an unusually high number of cases during the outbreak. METHODS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, we defined a super-spreader person (SSP) as any person with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed SVD linked to the infection of ≥ 13 other persons (10-fold the outbreak R). We reviewed illness narratives for SSPs collected through interviews. Whole-genome sequencing was used to support epidemiologic linkages between cases. RESULTS: Two SSPs (Patient A, a 33-year-old male, and Patient B, a 26-year-old male) were identified, and linked to the infection of one probable and 50 confirmed secondary cases. Both SSPs lived in the same parish and were likely infected by a single ill healthcare worker in early October while receiving healthcare. Both sought treatment at multiple health facilities, but neither was ever isolated at an Ebola Treatment Unit (ETU). In total, 18 secondary cases (17 confirmed, one probable), including three deaths (17%), were linked to Patient A; 33 secondary cases (all confirmed), including 14 (42%) deaths, were linked to Patient B. Secondary cases linked to Patient A included family members, neighbours, and contacts at health facilities, including healthcare workers. Those linked to Patient B included healthcare workers, friends, and family members who interacted with him throughout his illness, prayed over him while he was nearing death, or exhumed his body. Intensive community engagement and awareness-building were initiated based on narratives collected about patients A and B; 49 (96%) of the secondary cases were isolated in an ETU, a median of three days after onset. Only nine tertiary cases were linked to the 51 secondary cases. Sequencing suggested plausible direct transmission from the SSPs to 37 of 39 secondary cases with sequence data. CONCLUSION: Extended time in the community while ill, social interactions, cross-district travel for treatment, and religious practices contributed to SVD super-spreading. Intensive community engagement and awareness may have reduced the number of tertiary infections. Intensive follow-up of contacts of case-patients may help reduce the impact of super-spreading events.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Uganda/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Feminino , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/virologia , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Ebolavirus/genética , Ebolavirus/isolamento & purificação
4.
Pan Afr Med J ; 47: 11, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38524112

RESUMO

On 6 March 2023, Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C was isolated from a cerebral spinal fluid sample from Obongi District, Uganda. This sample was one of many from patients who were presenting with fever, convulsions, and altered consciousness. We investigated to determine the scope of the meningitis cluster, identify risk factors of contracting meningitis, and inform control measures. We reviewed medical records, conducted active community case finding, and conducted key informant interviews in the affected communities to identify cases and factors associated with contracting meningitis. We analysed case data by person, place, and time. Between 22 December 2022 and 1 May 2023, 25 cases with 2 deaths of bacterial meningitis occurred in Palorinya Refugee Settlement, Obongi District. Of these, 4 were laboratory-confirmed with Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C, 6 were probable cases, and 15 were suspected cases. Most (76%) of case-patients were <18 years old with a median age of 12 years (range 1-66 years). None of the case-patients was vaccinated against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C. Each case-patient was from a different household and there was no epidemiological link between any of the cases. This meningococcal meningitis cluster caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C occurred among non-vaccinated persons mostly aged <18 years in Palorinya Refugee Settlement. We recommended vaccination of at-risk persons.


Assuntos
Meningite Meningocócica , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo C , Neisseria meningitidis , Refugiados , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Uganda/epidemiologia , Meningite Meningocócica/epidemiologia , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA