Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 111(2 Pt 2): 502-4, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18239000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Advanced abdominal pregnancy is rare, and one that occurs after uterine rupture with delivery of a viable fetus is exceptional. CASE: A multiparous patient was admitted at 29 weeks of gestation for conservative management of placenta previa. She complained of intermittent abdominal pain, but repeated assessment suggested that both the patient and the fetus were doing well. At 36 weeks, an abdominal pregnancy was diagnosed with radiological features suggestive of uterine rupture. Laparotomy was performed and a healthy infant was delivered. CONCLUSION: Fetal viability was achieved in this case of abdominal pregnancy secondary to uterine rupture after close maternal and fetal surveillance.


Assuntos
Gravidez Abdominal/diagnóstico , Gravidez Abdominal/etiologia , Ruptura Uterina/diagnóstico , Ruptura Uterina/etiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gravidez Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Uterina/cirurgia
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 47(2): 132-6, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17355303

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the Vabra aspirator and the Pipelle device as an outpatient endometrial assessment tool. METHOD: This was a randomised, prospective trial conducted for a period of one year. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were recruited, of which 71 were in the Vabra group and 76 were in the Pipelle arm. The procedure success rate in the Pipelle group was significantly higher than the Vabra arm (98.7 vs 88.7%, P=0.02). Adequate tissue yield was also significantly more in the Pipelle arm (73.3 vs 52.4%, P=0.02). Cost-benefit analysis revealed a higher average cost per patient in the Vabra group compared to the Pipelle arm. CONCLUSION: This study proved that the Vabra aspirator was not as effective as the Pipelle device in obtaining endometrial tissue for histological diagnosis. Despite its higher price per unit, the Pipelle device was a more cost-effective tool for outpatient endometrial assessment.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Biópsia por Agulha/instrumentação , Endométrio/citologia , Metrorragia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Biópsia por Agulha/economia , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...