Prognostic Heterogeneity Between Oral Tongue and Gingivobuccal Tumours Based on Lymph Node Ratio and Number of Positive Nodes: A Survival Analysis.

Introduction: Lymph node ratio (LNR) and number of pathological positive nodes (pN) have shown better prognostic prediction compared to laterality, size and number of nodes (single or multiple). This study evaluates the prognostic significance of LNR and the number of  pathological positive nodes in predicting the outcomes of node positive oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC). It attempts to assess the prognostic heterogeneity between oral tongue and gingivobuccal complex tumours based on the lymph node ratio and the number of pathological positive nodes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 498 previously untreated OSCC patients from January 2014 to December 2017 at our tertiary cancer institute was done. Our analysis included 133 oral tongue and 79 gingivobuccal tumours with histopathologically proven lymph node metastasis. The impact of LNR and number of positive nodes on overall survival and disease free survival was studied. Results: Overall survival rate was found to vary significantly based on LNR (> 0.06) and number of positive nodes (> 2). Overall survival reduced significantly in GBC tumours when LNR was more than 0.06(63.37 vs 32.1, p 0.005) but the same trend was not seen with tongue cancers (55.61 vs 41.9, p 0.98). Both the groups shown no difference in DFS based on LNR. Overall survival reduced significantly in both the groups when >2o pathologically positive nodes were present but disease free survival did not vary significantly in both the groups. Conclusion: Lymph node ratio (> 0.06) and number of pathological positive nodes (> 2) provide a better prognostic stratification in node positive oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral tongue and GBC tumours were found to have a differential impact on overall survival rate on the stratification based on LNR.

Tracheo Esophageal Prosthesis Insertion Under Endoscopic Guidance and Local Anaesthesia- Feasibility and Outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy is by tracheo esophageal puncture (TEP) and prosthesis insertion. Secondary TEP is very difficult due to neck fibrosis. Puncture under local anaesthesia with endoscopy guidance is a feasible option. METHODS: Retrospective review of all laryngectomy patients from March 2009 till March 2019 was done and the methods of voice rehabilitation were assessed. The patients undergoing the procedure were classified according to the timing of insertion and type as primary insertion under general anaesthesia (Group P), secondary insertion under local anaesthesia (Group L), secondary insertion under general anaesthesia (Group G). The speech outcome and the procedure outcome were compared. RESULTS: There were 148 patients who underwent laryngectomy, of which groups P, G, L were 12, 12 and 11. The rate of successful insertion was 100% in primary, 91.6% in secondary in general anaesthesia and 91% in secondary under local anaesthesia. All secondary TEP were done after surgery and radiotherapy. Complications related to the insertion techniques were minimal. Speech outcome were similar on intelligibility rating scale and longevity was not affected by the method. CONCLUSION: TEP in local anaesthesia is feasible and has comparable outcome with TEP in general anaesthesia. Financial burden was very much less in group L compared to the other two groups.