J-AVENUE: A retrospective, real-world study evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial showed that avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We report findings from J-AVENUE (NCT05431777), a real-world study of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan. METHODS: Medical charts of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who received avelumab maintenance between February and November 2021, were reviewed. Patients were followed until June 2022. The primary endpoint was patient characteristics; secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and progression-free survival. RESULTS: In 79 patients analyzed, median age was 72 years (range, 44-86). Primary tumor site was upper tract in 45.6% and bladder in 54.4%. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin + gemcitabine (63.3%). Median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. Best response to chemotherapy was complete response in 10.1%, partial response in 58.2%, and stable disease in 31.6%. Median treatment-free interval before avelumab was 4.9 weeks. With avelumab first-line maintenance therapy, the disease control rate was 58.2%, median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.4), and median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-9.7). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from J-AVENUE show the effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan in clinical practice, with similar progression-free survival to JAVELIN Bladder 100 and previous real-world studies, supporting its use as a standard of care.

Clinical utility of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) based on the serum albumin level and the lymphocyte count has been investigated as a prognostic factor in patients with malignant tumors. However, it has been poorly studied in prostate cancer (PCa), and little is known about its clinical utility. METHODS: Clinical data of 353 patients with de novo, metastatic, hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC) who received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were obtained from multiple institutions between 2000 and 2019. The impacts of the pretreatment PNI level on treatment response and survival, together with clinical parameters, were examined. The Mann-Whitney U test, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate significance. RESULTS: The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen level were 73 and 266.18 ng/mL, respectively. Patients with a low PNI had shorter progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, low PNI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.0027, HR = 1.65), as well as advanced age (p = 0.049, HR = 1.38), the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) 5 (p = 0.0027, HR = 1.69), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.08). A propensity score-matching analysis showed that the PNI level remained a significant prognostic biomarker for PFS (p = 0.0263), CSS (p = 0.0006), and OS (p = 0.0015). Furthermore, a novel risk classification using PNI, LDH, and the ISUP GG was established to stratify patients' prognosis. An increase in the number of risk factors was significantly correlated with poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A low pretreatment PNI might be an effective biomarker of poor treatment response and survival in patients with mHSPC undergoing ADT.

Development and validation of novel nomogram to identify the candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer patients in the robotic era.

OBJECTIVES: To determine candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection using a novel nomogram to assess the risk of lymph node invasion in Japanese prostate cancer patients in the robotic era. METHODS: A total of 538 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection in three hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Medical records were reviewed uniformly and the following data collected: prostate-specific antigen, age, clinical T stage, primary and secondary Gleason score at prostate biopsy, and percentage of positive core numbers. Finally, data from 434 patients were used for developing the nomogram and data from 104 patients were used for external validation. RESULTS: Lymph node invasion was detected in 47 (11%) and 16 (15%) patients in the development and validation set, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen, clinical T stage ≥3, primary Gleason score, grade group 5, and percentage of positive cores were selected as variables to incorporate into the nomogram. The area under the curve values were 0.781 for the internal and 0.908 for the external validation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present nomogram can help urologists identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection concomitant with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among patients with prostate cancer.

Upfront Androgen Receptor-Axis-Targeted Therapies in Men with De Novo High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: The extent of effectiveness of upfront androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARAT) versus total androgen blockade (TAB) in improving prostate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a real-world sample of Japanese patients with high-volume mHSPC remains unclear. We, therefore, investigated the efficacy and safety of upfront ARAT versus bicalutamide for de novo high-volume mHSPC in Japanese patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study that analyzed CSS, clinical PFS, and adverse events (AEs) in 170 patients with newly diagnosed high-volume mHSPC. Fifty-six patients were treated with upfront ARAT, and 114 of them were prescribed bicalutamide in addition to ADT between January 2018 and March 2021. The primary and secondary endpoints were CSS and PFS, respectively. A 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper of 0.2 was performed to match the ARAT group to TAB patients. RESULTS: During the follow-up for a median of 21.5 months, the median CSS was not reached and 37 months in the upfront ARAT and total androgen blockade (TAB) groups, respectively (log-rank test: P = 0.006) by propensity score matching (PSM). Moreover, while the PFS of ARAT was unreached, the median PFS of TAB was 9 months (log-rank test: P < 0.001). Nine patients discontinued ARAT owing to grade ≥ 3 AEs; one patient who was treated with TAB had a grade 3 AE. CONCLUSION: Upfront ARAT significantly prolonged the CSS and PFS of patients with high-volume mHSPC better than TAB, although ARAT was associated with a higher rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs. Upfront ARAT can be more beneficial for patients with de novo high-volume mHSPC than TAB.

Detection of intraductal carcinoma in prostate cancer patients with small tumor volume.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (intraductal carcinoma) and significant cancer (SC) in patients with small tumor volume (<0.5 cm3 ) in prostatectomy specimens. METHODS: Data from 639 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between April 2006 and December 2017 at Chiba University Hospital and 2 affiliated institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor volume in prostatectomy specimens was measured, and with a tumor volume of less than 0.5 cm3 , the presence of intraductal carcinoma and SC was examined. SC was defined as one that did not meet the definition of pathological insignificant cancer (organ-confined cancer, Grade Group 1, tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 ). The number of patients who met four active surveillance (AS) protocols was also examined. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients with tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 were identified in this study population (SC: 43 patients [52%], intraductal carcinoma: 5 patients [6%]). The median follow-up was 34.6 months (range: 18-57 months). Four (5%) developed biochemical recurrence. The number of positive biopsy cores ≥ 2 was an independent predictor of SC in patients with tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 (hazard ratio: 4.39; 95% confidence interval: 1.67-11.56; p = 0.003). In tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 , tumor volume was significantly correlated with the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (1 vs. 4-5, p = 0.002) and the presence of intraductal carcinoma (p = 0.004). In intraductal carcinoma-positive cases, four of five patients (80%) had the predictor of SC, which was two or more positive biopsy cores. Of the four AS protocols, the criteria for Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance were met most frequently in 46 cases (55%) of tumor volume less than 0.5 cm3 if targeted biopsy by magnetic resonance imaging was available. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that intraductal carcinoma was present even in cases with small tumor volumes. Grade Group and intraductal carcinoma showed a positive correlation with tumor volume.

Revision of CHAARTED and LATITUDE criteria among Japanese de novo metastatic prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To identify the real high-risk group among Japanese de novo metastatic prostate cancer patients who fit CHAARTED or LATITUDE criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients who fitted CHAARTED (292 patients) and LATITUDE (294 patients) criteria from Japanese multi-institutions. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy with bicalutamide as an initial treatment. Factors related to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The median OS was 55.5 months and 60.0 months in patients who met the CHAARTED and the LATITUDE criteria, respectively. In patients who met CHAARTED criteria, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (hazard ratio (HR) 2.63, P < 0.0001) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR 1.65, P = 0.042) were independent risk factors for OS. In patients who met the LATITUDE criteria, Gleason score (GS) ≥9 (HR 1.77, P = 0.0326) and LDH (HR 2.62, P < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for OS. Modified CHAARTED criteria by adding LDH and CRP showed a significant difference in OS (HR 2.55, P < 0.0001) with a comparative median OS (31.8 months) to placebo of CHAARTED trial (32.2 months). Modified LATITUDE criteria by adding GS ≥9 and LDH showed a significant difference in OS (HR 2.66, P < 0.0001) with a comparative median OS (32.7 months) to placebo of LATITUDE trial (34.7 months). CONCLUSION: Modified criteria may potentially elucidate the true "high volume" and "high risk" patients in the Japanese cohort who require early intensive therapy.

Prognostic factors influencing overall survival in de novo oligometastatic prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Oligometastatic cancer has been suggested as an intermediate state between localized disease and wide-ranging metastases. The clinical significance of local treatment in oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has been a recent topic of interest. However, standard definitions of oligometastasis are lacking. Here we studied risk factors among Japanese de novo oligometastatic patients with PCa. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed clinical data from 264 patients, including locally advanced (T3 or T4N0M0) cancer, lymph-node-positive cancer (Tany N1M0), and cancer with ≤10 bone metastases. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy only. The number of bone metastases and clinical factors were evaluated in association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The Mann-Whitney U test, Cox proportional hazard models, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used as statistical analyses. RESULTS: Median age, PSA at baseline and OS were 74 years, 55.2 ng/mL, and 129.0 months, respectively. The cutoff for the number of bone metastases having the greatest impact on OS was ≥3 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.67; P = .0001). In multivariate analysis, non-regional lymph node (LN) metastases (HR: 2.15; P = .0222), ISUP grade group (GG) 5 (HR: 2.04; P = .0186) and ≥3 bone metastases (HR: 1.82; P = .0390) were independent predictors of OS. In risk classification based on these factors, OS and PFS were significantly classifiable into poor (2-3 factors), intermediate (1 factor), and good (no factors) risk groups (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Not only the number of bone metastases, but also non-regional LN metastases predict OS in patients with de novo oligometastatic PCa.

Prognostic value of an inflammatory index for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory process has been reported to be involved in the formation and progression of various types of cancer. Recently, a peripheral inflammatory index, combining the derived neutrophils/(leukocytes minus neutrophils) ratio (dNLR) and the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, was proposed as a useful prognostic marker in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. The prognostic value of inflammatory markers in prostate cancer has not been established. We aimed to validate the prognostic significance of this peripheral inflammatory index in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: Clinical data of 196 mCRPC patients were retrospectively collected from multiple institutions. Clinical factors and inflammatory markers at the development of CRPC, including white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, dNLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP), and LDH levels, were evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups based on the inflammatory index: Good (low dNLR and LDH), Intermediate (high dNLR or LDH), and Poor (high dNLR and LDH). Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival after CRPC were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: The median age and baseline prostate-specific antigen level were 75 years and 397.15 ng/mL, respectively. On multivariate analysis, dNLR (≥1.51; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.624; P = .0173), LDH (≥upper limit of normal; HR = 2.065; P = .0004), alkaline phosphatase (≥310 U/L; HR = 2.546; P < .0001), and positive N stage (HR = 1.621; P = .048) were associated with poor OS after CRPC, whereas other inflammatory markers including the NLR were not. The Good inflammatory index group showed significantly longer OS after CRPC compared to the Intermediate and Poor groups, with median survivals of 46.2, 28.9, and 16.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The novel inflammatory index combining dNLR and LDH was a useful prognostic parameter in patients with mCRPC. Our analysis suggested that dNLR emerged as a more valuable prognostic marker than NLR.

How many bone metastases may be defined as high-volume metastatic prostate cancer in Asians: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recent landmark randomized trials (CHAARTED and LATITUDE studies) have highlighted potent upfront therapy for "high-volume" and "high-risk" metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer (mCNPC). However, treatment response shows racial differences. We aimed to propose a novel definition for "high-volume" prostate cancer in Asians. METHODS: We retrospectively pursued 426 patients with de novo mCNPC from multiple institutions between 1999 and 2017. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy alone as initial treatment. We evaluated the number of bone metastases at diagnosis to clarify the clinical significance for progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, Cox proportional hazard models, and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Median age and prostate-specific antigen level were 73 years and 266.2 ng/ml, respectively. Median OS was 55.5 months in patients who met the CHAARTED high criteria (vs 33.1 months in the trial). We evaluated 5 thresholds in the number of bone metastases (≥4, ≥6, ≥11, ≥16, and ≥21) to investigate the prognostic values. Patients with ≥11 bone metastases showed the highest HR for OS (2.766). Patients with 11 to 20 bone metastases had a significantly shorter OS than those with ≤10 metastases (P = .0001). We, therefore, proposed modified CHAARTED and LATITUDE high criteria (extending bone metastases ≥11). In multivariate analysis, the modified criteria were the only independent prognostic factors for OS (P = .0272 and P = .042, respectively). Conversely, no significant differences in OS were seen between patients with 1 to 3 bone metastases and 4 to 10 (P = .7513). CONCLUSION: Our exploratory study suggested ≥11 bone metastases as a suitable definition for "high-volume" prostate cancer in Asians. A larger, prospective study is warranted to verify our findings.

Higher Serum Testosterone Levels Associated with Favorable Prognosis in Enzalutamide- and Abiraterone-Treated Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Testosterone plays a significant role in maintaining the tumor microenvironment. The role of the target serum testosterone (TST) level in enzalutamide- (Enza) and abiraterone (Abi)-treated castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients was studied. In total, 107 patients treated with Enza and/or Abi at Chiba University Hospital and affiliated hospitals were studied. The relationships between progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical factors were studied by Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier models. In the Abi and Enza groups overall, TST ≥ 13 ng/dL (median) (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.43, p = 0.0032) remained an independent prognostic factor for PFS. In the Enza group, TST ≥ 13 ng/dL (median) was found to be a significant prognostic factor (HR 0.28, p = 0.0044), while, in the Abi group, TST ≥ 12 ng/dL (median) was not significant (HR 0.40, p = 0.0891). TST showed significant correlation with PFS periods (r = 0. 32, p = 0.0067), whereas, for OS, TST ≥ 13 ng/dL (median) showed no significant difference in the Abi and Enza groups overall. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, a longer PFS at first-line therapy showed a favorable prognosis in the Enza group (p = 0.0429), while no difference was observed in the Abi group (p = 0.6051). The TST level and PFS of first-line therapy may be considered when determining the treatment strategy for CRPC patients.

Treatment strategy for metastatic prostate cancer with extremely high PSA level: reconsidering the value of vintage therapy.

The prognostic significance of initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level for metastatic prostate cancer remains uncertain. We investigated the differences in prognosis and response to hormonal therapies of metastatic prostate cancer patients according to initial PSA levels. We analyzed 184 patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer and divided them into three PSA level groups as follows: low (<100 ng ml-1), intermediate (100-999 ng ml-1), and high (≥1000 ng ml-1). All patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) immediately. We investigated PSA progression-free survival (PFS) for first-line ADT and overall survival (OS) within each of the three groups. Furthermore, we analyzed response to antiandrogen withdrawal (AW) and alternative antiandrogen (AA) therapies after development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). No significant differences in OS were observed among the three groups (P = 0.654). Patients with high PSA levels had significantly short PFS for first-line ADT (P = 0.037). Conversely, patients in the high PSA level group had significantly longer PFS when treated with AW than those in the low PSA level group (P = 0.047). Furthermore, patients with high PSA levels had significantly longer PFS when provided with AA therapy (P = 0.049). PSA responders to AW and AA therapies had significantly longer survival after CRPC development than nonresponders (P = 0.011 and P < 0.001, respectively). Thus, extremely high PSA level predicted favorable response to vintage sequential ADT and AW. The current data suggest a novel aspect of extremely high PSA value as a favorable prognostic marker after development of CRPC.

Significant prognostic difference between Grade Group 4 and 5 in the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Grading System for High Grade Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate prognostic difference between Gleason Score (GS) 8 and 9-10, as the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading Systems proposed, in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with bone metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on 106 patients with GS 8-10 between 2006 and 2016. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy immediately. We validated biochemical recurrence, PCa-specific survival, and overall survival, and analyzed the predictive value for overall survival. RESULTS: Patients with GS 9-10 had significantly lower PCa-specific survival (50.5% vs. 83.4%, P = 0.01) and overall survival (38.8% vs. 66.3%, P = 0.04) at 5 years than those with GS 8, while biochemical recurrence rate was not significantly different (P = 0.26). Furthermore, these significant differences between GS 8 and 9-10 were also observed among high-risk groups proposed in Japan Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Stratification (prostate cancer-specific survival: P = 0.03, overall survival: P = 0.04, respectively). Pathological GS 9-10 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.97, P = 0.04) in multivariable cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Among patients with GS 9-10, albumin level was an only prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.33, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Pathological GS 9-10 predicts significantly worse outcomes than GS 8 in Japanese PCa patients with bone metastasis. Our data indicated clinical significance of discriminating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading Group 4 and 5 among high-risk PCa patients with bone metastasis.

Outcomes of patients older than 75 years with non-metastatic prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer in elderly patients was formerly treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Since the latter of the 1990s new technologies were introduced into treatments, then strategies have varied. We aimed to observe the outcomes of elderly patients treated during transition period and compare each stage with others. METHODS: During 2008 and 2010, 255 patients with prostate cancer older than 75 years were sequentially treated. With exception of patients with bone and/or visceral metastasis, outcomes of 199 patients with localized and locally advanced stages were examined. Complete records were obtained by the end of 2015. RESULTS: In total, 122 (61%), 28 (14%), 37 (19%) and 12 (6%) of patients were in stages T1c-T2a, T2b-c, T3 and T4, respectively. Patients generally presented with abnormal screening or lower urinary tract symptom. Seventy-one percent of patients received androgen deprivation therapy as monotherapy and 22% of the radiation-treated patients added androgen deprivation therapy. Patients in stage T1c-T2a and T2b-c showed a favorable prognosis. Some cancer death appeared in patients with T3 and T4 during observation periods. Twenty-seven percent of patients died from prostate cancer-independent complications: pneumonia, heart disease, and brain vascular disease. Tendency is similar to that of Japanese elderly male population. No remarkable side effects from androgen deprivation therapy were noticed. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with localized prostate cancer showed favorable prognosis by androgen deprivation therapy with/without radiation, thus efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy is suitable to elderly patients with applicable stages. Prognosis of patients with locally advanced stage is serious and remains to be improved.

Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer (Stage T3).

OBJECTIVE: Formerly, locally advanced prostate cancer exhibited poorly prognosis. In the late 1990s, new surgical and radiation technologies were introduced in combination with androgen deprivation. To evaluate respective strategies, outcomes were examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2010, 224 patients with T3N0M0 (10.9% of all prostate cancer cases) were treated with prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy with/without androgen deprivation or hormone alone. Complete records were obtained by the end of 2015. RESULTS: Operation group first started without adjuvant treatment and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse occurred in 39% of cases. Radiation therapy group was alternatively divided into two subgroups, that received either monotherapy or combination with androgen deprivation, and PSA relapse rates were 65 and 16%, respectively. High rates of PSA relapse in both the operation and radiation therapy groups were observed in patients without adjuvant therapy, but after relapse androgen deprivation proceeded favorable outcomes. In the radiation subgroups, PSA relapse rates were different, but both subsequent survival rates were the same. This may be due to the effect of androgen deprivation after relapse, indicating effect of delayed therapy. PSA relapse rate in the hormone therapy group was 25% and after relapse, patients applied to treatment with other hormonal and anticancer drugs. Overall survival rates were 91, 88 and 67% in the operation, radiation therapy and hormone therapy groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Aggressive treatment with short-term androgen deprivation for locally advanced prostate cancer could be beneficial and not harmful when suitable candidates are selected. Delayed androgen deprivation was effective for no adjuvant patients after PSA relapse.

Long-term outcomes of nonpalpable prostate cancer (T1c) patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Various strategies have been used to treat patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer (T1c). As one of the treatments for this stage, a radical prostatectomy was performed and the outcomes were evaluated. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2002, 117 patients with T1c received a radical prostatectomy and their follow-up were examined by the end of 2013. Patients were classified according to risk groups using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleasson score, and outcomes of respective groups were compared. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of patients were in low risk group, and the remaining patients were grouped into the intermediate or high risks in half. In 22% insignificant cancer was detected. Biochemical failure occurred in 14%. One patient exhibited bone metastasis, but no deaths from prostate cancer ware observed. The five and ten year overall survival rates were 92% and 75%, respectively, and the biochemical failure-free survival rates were 92% and 89%, respectively. No different outcomes were observed for the different risk groups in the overall and biochemical failure-free survival rates. T1c tumors contain a certain range of various stages of tumors, but most patients experienced favorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy as monotherapy is one of the treatment option for T1c prostate cancer patients, who have a long life span and belong to intermediate or high risk groups.

Management of men with a suspicion of prostate cancer after negative initial prostate biopsy results.

INTRODUCTION: For men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), appropriate management after negative prostate biopsy remains controversial. After determining PSA kinetics, subsequent follow-up was considered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 115 cases with negative repeat biopsy were followed by evaluating PSA kinetics and ratio of percent free PSA (F/T) and by performing second repeat biopsy. RESULTS: Eighteen cancer cases were diagnosed. Shorter PSA doubling times and faster velocities were found in cancer cases compared with cases without cancer. We observed a clear decrease in F/T among cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies, cases with a suspicion of cancer after negative biopsy can be divided into two groups: one that requires additional biopsies and one with an average change in PSA of <1 ng/ml/year and no change in F/T, which is recommended for surveillance as stable disease without biopsy over a specified time period.

Clinical outcomes by relative docetaxel dose and dose intensity as chemotherapy for Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a retrospective multi-institutional collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate clinical outcomes by relative dose and dose intensity of docetaxel (DOC) as chemotherapy for Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: A total of 145 CRPC patients who received more than 4 courses of DOC chemotherapy at 14 hospitals between 2005 and 2011 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups--those receiving a higher or lower dose (mg/m(2)) or dose intensity (mg/m(2)/week). Differences between the groups regarding treatment outcomes and adverse events (AEs) were determined. Additionally, prognostic factors predictive of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in these patients were identified by both univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The total patient group underwent a mean of 11.2 ± 7.4 DOC cycles, and the mean CSS after therapy was 15.6 ± 10.1 months. The higher-dose group had a better prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response than the lower-dose group. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in prognosis after DOC chemotherapy. Leukopenia and neutropenia were observed more frequently in the higher-dose group. Serum biomarkers (including PSA, lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase), hemoglobin levels and presence of pain at initiation of chemotherapy, as well as the PSA nadir level on first-line hormone therapy, all were significant predictors of CSS. CONCLUSIONS: In the Japanese population, relatively low-dose DOC chemotherapy had no deleterious effect on the CSS of CRPC patients, and a lower incidence of AEs occurred, in spite of a diminished PSA response compared with those receiving a higher dose.

Clinical Impact of Solifenacin on Generic and Symptom-Specific Quality of Life for Females with Overactive Bladder: Using the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Rand Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness of antimuscarinic treatment on disease-specific and generic quality of life (QoL) in females with clinically diagnosed overactive bladder (OAB) by prospectively analyzing improvements in the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and the Rand Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). METHODS: We prospectively recruited newly diagnosed female patients with OAB. Pretreatment disease-specific symptoms were documented, and generic QoL questionnaires were administered. All subjects received solifenacin 5 mg/day for >8 weeks. Symptoms and general health-related QoL (HRQoL) were assessed using the OABSS and SF-36, respectively. Other objective variables, such as maximum urinary flow rate and postvoid residual urine volume, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-eight subjects met all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria. After 8 weeks, the mean OABSS decreased by approximately 50% compared with baseline (from 9.1 ± 2.8 to 4.5 ± 3.6). All individual scores in OABSS improved after administration of solifenacin. Before treatment, the scores of the study subjects in all SF-36 domains were significantly worse than the age- and gender-adjusted Japanese national norms (P < 0.01), except the vitality (VT) scale. Intra-group comparisons between age groups showed worse mental health (MH) scores in all age groups. In the OAB group, three mean SF-36 scales (physical function [PF], VT, and MH) significantly improved after treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment of OAB with solifenacin is associated with significant improvement in generic HRQoL and disease-specific symptoms at 8 weeks after drug administration. Particularly for generic HRQoL as measured by the SF-36, solifenacin treatment effectively improves three SF-36 scores: PF, VT, and MH.

IgG4-related periureteral fibrosis presenting as a unilateral ureteral mass.

IgG4-related sclerosing disease is a rare disease characterized by fibrosis and lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in various organs. Here, we report a rare case of IgG4-related fibrosis that presented as a unilateral ureteral mass in a 39-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain. Left hydronephrosis and a mass measuring 3 × 1.1 cm in the lower portion of the left ureter were found. As a ureteral malignancy could not be ruled out, the left ureter was resected partially. Pathologically, severe fibrosis and infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and eosinophils were found. No malignancy was found. Immunohistochemically, most of the plasma cells were IgG4-positive. The serum IgG4 level was also elevated (233 mg/dl). The histological characteristics were similar to those of retroperitoneal fibrosis, inflammatory pseudotumor, or idiopathic segmental ureteritis. It is important to consider IgG4-related sclerosing disease in the differential diagnosis of a unilateral ureteral mass.

Efficacy and safety of dutasteride on prostate cancer risk reduction in Asian men: the results from the REDUCE study.

OBJECTIVE: A post hoc analysis of Asian men in the REDUCE study was conducted to investigate whether the outcomes were in line with those of the overall population. METHODS: REDUCE was a 4-year international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Inclusion criteria were men between 50 and 75 years of age, a serum prostate-specific antigen level of 2.5-10.0 ng/ml (50-60 years) or 3.0-10.0 ng/ml (>60 years), and a single, negative prostate biopsy (6-12 cores) within 6 months before enrollment. The primary endpoint was biopsy-detectable prostate cancer. This post hoc analysis included subjects who were recorded as Asian. RESULTS: A total of 134 Asians, including 57 Japanese, were randomized to the study treatment. During the study period, the incidence of prostate cancer in the placebo and dutasteride groups was 19.6% (11/56) and 9.3% (5/54), respectively (relative risk reduction, 54%; 95% confidence intervals, -27 to 83%, P = 0.12), in the Asian subpopulation. Fewer tumors with the Gleason scores of 7-10 and 8-10 were detected among dutasteride-treated men. Although the incidences of drug-related sexual adverse events were higher in the dutasteride group, only in rare occasions did they lead to drug discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of prostate cancer in the dutasteride group was lower than that in the placebo group, although the difference was not significant. These results paralleled those for the overall population and support the value of dutasteride for prostate cancer risk reduction in Asian men with an increased risk of prostate cancer.