Body fat in men with prolactinoma.

OBJECTIVE: (a) To evaluate body fat in men with prolactinoma and healthy controls, using whole body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and (b) to correlate DXA results with anthropometry and clinical aspects of male prolactinomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in two University referral centers. Eleven newly-diagnosed men with prolactinoma and 9 with normal PRL levels due to dopamine agonist treatment were submitted to DXA and blood analysis (PRL, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, estradiol, and SHBG) by the time of their clinical evaluation. They were compared with 14 control men of similar age and body mass index distribution. RESULTS: Newly-diagnosed men with prolactinoma had higher fat percentage in the arms and the total body, when compared with patients treated with dopamine agonists and controls. The former group also presented higher fat percentage in the legs than the controls. Truncal fat percentage of the newly-diagnosed patients was lower than the dopamine agonist treated group. The 3 groups had similar android and gynoid fat contents. Fat percentage of the 6 sites correlated with PRL, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone levels. CONCLUSION: Newly-diagnosed men with prolactinomas had higher body fat content. Body fat was linked to disease control, especially to the PRL and androgen levels. Consequently, adequate control of hyperprolactinemia should be pursued in order to reduce the risk of obesity and its metabolic complications in men with prolactinoma.

Prevalence of osteopenia in men with prolactinoma.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyze bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in 30 men with prolactinoma, and compare them to 22 control subjects. BMD of lumbar spine and femur was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. PRL, testosterone, estradiol, sexual hormone-binding globulin and free androgen and estrogen indexes (FAI and FEI, respectively) were measured in all the subjects. In patients with prolactinoma, mean values of PRL and testosterone were calculated for the 12-month period that preceded the study. The mean T-score of the four sites analyzed by bone densitometry was lower in men with prolactinoma than in controls (p-values: lumbar spine=0.015, femoral neck <0.0001, trochanter=0.037, total femur=0.036), and 55.6% of the former presented osteopenia or osteoporosis at one or more sites (p =0.035). The lumbar spine was the most seriously affected site, where 29.6% had osteopenia and 14.8% had osteoporosis. By the time of BMD determination, significant associations were found between BMD and PRL, testosterone, FAI, estradiol, FEI, and duration of hypogonadism. Considering the period of 12 months that preceded BMD evaluation, trochanter BMD was associated with mean PRL levels, while there was an association between lumbar spine BMD and mean testosterone levels. However, the multiple regression analysis showed that estradiol was the main determinant of BMD. In conclusion, men with prolactinoma have high prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone loss in such patients is associated with hyperprolactinemia and hypogonadism, and mainly influenced by estrogen.