The Effect of Ptosis Surgery on Meibomian Glands and Dry Eye Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of ptosis surgery on dry eye disease as measured by dry eye parameters and meibomian gland function. METHODS: This prospective, case series study included patients with involutional ptosis with no prior history of dry eye disease who were scheduled for a levator aponeurosis advancement procedure. Dry eye evaluation included the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire as well as objective measurements, which included meibomian gland loss measured by meibography, meibomian gland disease grading, tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining, tear meniscus height, and Schirmer testing. All dry eye measurements were recorded preoperatively and repeated 21-28 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 30 eyes were included with a mean age of 65.6 ± 11.9 years. There was a significant improvement in margin reflex distance1 (MRD1) postoperatively ( p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in upper lid margin thickening ( p = 0.022). There were no significant differences between the pre- and postoperative measurements in meibomian gland loss, TBUT, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining, tear meniscus height, and the Schirmer test. OSDI was increased nonsignificantly postoperatively (16.094 vs. 24.296, respectively, p = 0.107). CONCLUSION: The levator aponeurosis advancement procedure does not affect the eyelid meibomian glands, nor does it cause an increase in dry eye signs and symptoms, according to the measured parameters.

Assessment of dry eye disease in N95 versus surgical face mask wearers during COVID-19.

Purpose: Investigating the effect of different face masks on dry eye disease (DED) among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a comparative, cross-sectional study. Participants were included into two groups: group 1 (n = 30) wore surgical masks, and group 2 (n = 30) wore N95 masks with face shields. Demographic and ocular surface disease index questionnaires (OSDI) were performed. In addition, Tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining, and meibography to assess meibomian gland loss (MGL) were performed on all participants. Independent T-test was used to compare continuous parameters and Chi-square test for categorical variables. The relationship between continuous variables was tested using bivariate Pearson correlation. Results: Sixty healthcare workers participated in this study (36 females and 24 males). The mean (±SD) age of the surgical mask and N95 groups was 35.33 (±14.94) and 36.63 (±10.64) years, respectively. Both masks caused dryness according to TBUT, MGL, and OSDI scores. DED per DEWS II definition was observed in 14 (46.7%) and 16 (53.3%) patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Comparing the two groups, N95 mask caused significantly more dryness according to TBUT (P = 0.042) and fluorescein staining (P = 0.038 for the right eye and P = 0.015 for the left eye). Conclusion: Physicians should be aware of the potential dry eye signs secondary to face mask wear during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further attention should be taken in patients who suffer from preexisting dry eye syndrome and in patients who undergo intraocular operations.