RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Systematic protocols for the management of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and information on the current status of a prescription of parenteral antibiotics for outpatients and referred patients are lacking in the Korea. This study aimed to describe the current status of OPAT at a tertiary care hospital in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of outpatients and referral patients who were prescribed parenteral antibiotics from July to December 2019. We reviewed the prescribed antimicrobials, indications for antimicrobial therapy, institution administering the antimicrobial injections, and pre- and post-prescription management. RESULTS: Of the 577 prescriptions assessed in this study, 399 (69.2%) and 178 (30.8%) were delivered using the referral and outpatient models, respectively. About 70% of OPATs were prescribed in the pulmonology, infectious diseases, orthopedics, gastroenterology, and hematology departments. Five antibiotics (ertapenem [26.0%], ceftriaxone [12.8%], kanamycin [11.8%], amikacin [10.1%], and cefazolin [8.5%]) accounted for 69.2% of the total OPATs. Urinary tract (27.3%), respiratory (20.8%), and intra-abdominal (15.9%) infections were the most frequent indications for OPAT. After prescription, there were 295 (73.9%) and 150 (84.3%) follow-up visits in the referral and outpatient models, respectively (P <0.05). Laboratory tests necessary for monitoring were fully performed for 274 (47.5%) prescriptions. CONCLUSION: We found that a significant number of OPATs were prescribed, follow-up visits were not performed in the case of about a quarter of prescriptions, and laboratory monitoring was not fully conducted in more than half of the cases. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an appropriate management program for OPAT. Considering the limited resources and the distribution of OPAT prescriptions, an effective strategy may be to select the frequently-used antibiotics or frequently-prescribing departments and start the program with them.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients need parenteral nutrition because of nausea, vomiting, and mucositis caused by conditioning regimens. The demand for glutamine increases during the HSCT period. We evaluated the effects of glutamine-containing parenteral nutrition on the clinical outcomes of HSCT patients. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed HSCT patients from Seoul National University from August 2013 to July 2017. Depending on their glutamine supplementation status, 91 patients were divided into 2 groups: glutamine group (N=44) and non-glutamine group (N=47). We analyzed the rate of weight change, infection (clinically/microbiologically documented), complications (duration of mucositis and neutropenia, acute graft versus host disease), and 100-days mortality in each group. RESULTS: Regarding the clinical characteristics of the patients, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups except that there was a larger proportion of myeloablative conditioning regimen in the glutamine group (P=0.005). In the glutamine group, the average number of days of glutamine use, parenteral nutrition, and mucositis was 7.6±1.4, 14.6±9.9, and 13.3±9.5, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed odds ratios of 0.37 (95% CI, 0.14-0.96; P=0.042) and 0.08 (95% CI, 0.01-0.98; P=0.048) for clinically documented infection and 100-days mortality, respectively, in the glutamine group. CONCLUSION: Results showed that the glutamine group had less clinically documented infection and 100-days mortality than the non-glutamine group, but the other outcomes did not show significant differences. The extended duration of glutamine supplementation according to the period of total parenteral nutrition and mucositis should be considered.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anal incontinence is experienced by some patients with rectal cancer who received low anterior resection. This study was to examine the efficacy and adverse effects of the alpha-1 adrenergic agonist phenylephrine, which causes contraction of the internal anal sphincter and raises the resting pressure in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with anal incontinence were treated with 30% phenylephrine or a placebo randomly allocated in a double-blind study. The efficacy of the drug was assessed by changes in the following standardized questionnaire scores: the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scales, and a global efficacy question. Anal sphincter function was evaluated using anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Phenylephrine did not improve either the FISI score or any of the four FIQL scores. Five of 17 (29%) patients reported subjective improvement after phenylephrine compared with 4 of 12 (33%) using the placebo. The maximum resting anal pressure did not differ between baseline and after 4 weeks application of phenylephrine (30.0 to 27.3 mmHg). In the phenylephrine group, allergic dermatitis was developed in five patients and headache in two. CONCLUSION: In the patients with anal incontinence after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, phenylephrine gel did not seem to be helpful in relieving symptoms with some adverse effects.
