Utility of Substrate Mapping Using Extrasystole to Localise Comprehensive Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits: Results From Intra-operative Mapping Studies.

BACKGROUND: Substrate mapping-based identification of all ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits (diastolic activation), including partial and complete diastolic circuits in clinical and nonclinical VT, could be beneficial in guiding VT ablation to prevent VT recurrence. The utility of extrasystole induced late potentials has not been compared with late potentials in sinus rhythm (SR) and right ventricular pacing (RVp). METHODS: Intraoperative simultaneous panoramic endocardial mapping of 21 VTs in 16 ischemic heart disease patients was performed with the use of a 112-bipole endocardial balloon. The decrement of near-field electrogram later than surface QRS during extrasystole (eLP) was studied. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 52 ± 9 years and were predominantly (75%) male. The mean sensitivity of eLP (0.75 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.78]) to detect VT circuits was better than SR (0.33 [0.30-0.36]; P < 0.001) and RVp (0.36 [0.33-0.39]; P < 0.001) without significant differences in specificity, eLP (0.77 [0.74-0.81], SR (0.82 [0.80-0.84]; P = 0.23), and RVp (0.81 [0.78-0.83]; P = 0.11). Both negative (NPV) and positivie (PPV) predictive values were significantly better for eLP mapping. The mean NPV was 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.81), 0.57 (0.55-0.59), and 0.58 (0.55-0.61) for eLP, SR, and RVp, respectively (P < 0.0001). PPV was 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78), 0.63 (0.59-0.67), and 0.63 (0.59-0.67) for eLP, SR, and RVp, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall diagnostic performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was significantly better for eLP (0.85 [95% CI 0.80-0.90] compared with SR (0.63 [0.56-0.72]; P < 0.001) or RVp (0.61 [0.52-0.74]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Evoked late potential mapping is a better tool to detect comprehensive diastolic circuits activated during VT, compared with eLP mapping in sinus rhythm or RV pacing.

Mortalité, congé et arythmie chez les patients ayant la COVID-19 et une atteinte cardiaque.

CONTEXTE: Les atteintes cardiaques sont fréquentes dans les cas graves de maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) et sont associées à un mauvais pronostic. Notre étude portait sur les facteurs prédictifs de mortalité intrahospitalière, les caractéristiques de l'arythmie et les effets des traitements qui allongent l'intervalle QT chez les patients ayant une atteinte cardiaque. MÉTHODES: Nous avons fait une étude de cohorte rétrospective des cas graves de COVID-19 admis à l'hôpital Tongji, à Wuhan, en Chine, entre le 29 janvier et le 8 mars 2020. En examinant ceux qui avaient une atteinte cardiaque, définie ici comme un taux élevé de troponine I cardiaque (TnIc), nous avons déterminé les caractéristiques biologiques et cliniques associées à la mortalité et au besoin de ventilation invasive. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 1284 cas graves de COVID-19, 1159 avaient au dossier un taux de TnIc mesuré à l'admission, qui pour 170 (14,7 %) participants indiquait une atteinte cardiaque. Les patients ayant une atteinte cardiaque avaient un taux de mortalité nettement plus élevé que les autres patients (71,2 % c. 6,6 %; p < 0,001). Nous avons constaté que le taux de TnIc initial (pour chaque augmentation d'un facteur 10, rapport de risque [HR] 1,32, intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % 1,06­1,66) et le taux de TnIc maximal atteint au cours de la maladie (pour chaque augmentation d'un facteur 10, HR 1,70, IC à 95 % 1,38­2,10) étaient associés à de minces chances de survie. Le taux de TnIc maximal était aussi associé au besoin de ventilation invasive (rapport de cotes 3,02, IC à 95 % 1,92­4,98). Sur les 170 patients ayant une atteinte cardiaque, 44 (25,9 %) présentaient une arythmie. Les 6 qui souffraient de tachycardie ou de fibrillation ventriculaires sont morts. Nous avons remarqué que les patients qui recevaient des médicaments allongeant l'intervalle QT avaient un intervalle QTc plus long que ceux qui n'en recevaient pas (différence entre les médianes 45 ms; p = 0,01), mais que ce traitement n'était pas directement lié à la mortalité (HR 1,04, IC à 95 % 0,69­1,57). INTERPRÉTATION: Chez les patients ayant la COVID-19 et une atteinte cardiaque, les taux initial et maximal de TnIc sont associés à de minces chances de survie, et le taux maximal est un facteur prédictif du besoin de ventilation invasive. Les malades de la COVID-19 doivent subir un dépistage des atteintes cardiaques et être surveillés, surtout si on leur fait suivre un traitement qui peut prolonger la repolarisation. Enregistrement de l'essai : Registre des essais cliniques chinois, n° ChiCTR2000031301.

Death, discharge and arrhythmias among patients with COVID-19 and cardiac injury.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac injury is common in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to study predictors of in-hospital death, characteristics of arrhythmias and the effects of QT-prolonging therapy in patients with cardiac injury. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients with severe COVID-19 who were admitted to Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China, between Jan. 29 and Mar. 8, 2020. Among patients who had cardiac injury, which we defined as an elevated level of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), we identified demographic and clinical characteristics associated with mortality and need for invasive ventilation. RESULTS: Among 1284 patients with severe COVID-19, 1159 had a cTnI level measured on admission to hospital, of whom 170 (14.7%) had results that showed cardiac injury. We found that mortality was markedly higher in patients with cardiac injury (71.2% v. 6.6%, p < 0.001). We determined that initial cTnI (per 10-fold increase, hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.66) and peak cTnI level during illness (per 10-fold increase, HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.38-2.10) were associated with poor survival. Peak cTnI was also associated with the need for invasive ventilation (odds ratio 3.02, 95% CI 1.92-4.98). We found arrhythmias in 44 of the 170 patients with cardiac injury (25.9%), including 6 patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, all of whom died. We determined that patients who received QT-prolonging drugs had longer QTc intervals than those who did not receive them (difference in medians, 45 ms, p = 0.01), but such treatment was not independently associated with mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.57). INTERPRETATION: We found that in patients with COVID-19 and cardiac injury, initial and peak cTnI levels were associated with poor survival, and peak cTnI was a predictor of need for invasive ventilation. Patients with COVID-19 warrant assessment for cardiac injury and monitoring, especially if therapy that can prolong repolarization is started. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No. ChiCTR2000031301.