Healthcare Workers' Perspectives on the Utilization of the International HIV Dementia Scale for the Screening HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders: A Qualitative Study at TASO Centres in Central and Southwestern Uganda.

Introduction: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are becoming a significant public health concern in the continuum of human immune virus (HIV) treatment. These disorders range from subtle cognitive impairments to severe dementia. Despite many early-stage HAND cases being asymptomatic, healthcare workers (HCWs) rarely perform routine neurocognitive assessments. This leads to a high number of unrecognized cases and increases the risk of HAND among people living with HIV (PLWH). Material and Methods: We aimed to explore HCWs' perspectives on integrating the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) into routine care for screening HAND at The AIDS Support Organization (TASO) centres in central and southwestern Uganda. Results: We conducted five focus group discussions with 37 HCWs from five TASO centres. Thematic analysis revealed eight key theme: 1) Impaired brain function, 2) Changes in activities of daily living, 3) Promotion of quality care perspectives, 4) Tool applicable and user-friendly, 5) Client increased self-awareness and self-confidence, 6) Integration of IHDS into routine HIV care, 7) Uncertainty about IHDS use, and 8) Continuous training for HCWs. Conclusion: As PLWH enjoy longer and healthier lives, their risk for HAND increases, potentially affecting their quality of life. The use of the IHDS has raised awareness among HCWs and improved decision-making through cognitive assessments, emphasizing it value in PLWH. We recommend a prospective study to assess the long-term outcomes and efficacy of increased HAND screening. Furthermore, integrating a HAND screening module into the consolidated HIV guidelines is recommended to enhance its relevance.

Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals.

Background: The safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) short form (2006) is important for assessing patient safety culture in clinical environments. However, little is known about its validity and applicability in Uganda. This study validated the SAQ short form (2006) for use in assessing patient safety culture in critical care settings of hospitals in the Ugandan context. Methods: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods research design, the face, content and construct validity for the SAQ short form (2006) was assessed in a multi-phased approach. A panel of eight (8) purposively selected experts assessed the face and content validity in rounds 1 and 2, respectively, while construct validity was assessed in round 3 using data from a cross-sectional survey of 256 frontline health workers in critical care settings of the selected hospitals. Analysis of survey data followed confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha examined internal reliability. Results: Of the 36 items in the tool's original version, 33 were rated clear, with a score of 100% on face validity. The use of contextual vocabulary and formatting issues arose as concerns. The S-CVI/Ave was 100%, and S-CVI/UA was 86.1%. Four new items added on effective communication as another dimension of patient safety culture. The survey had KMO=0.8605, the a priori-based model had a scale Cronbach's alpha=0.8881, with unsatisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.051, 90% CI: 0.044-0.057, pclose=0.427; chi-square=694.28, p <0.001; CFI=0.884, TLI=0.871). The modified final model had a scale Cronbach's alpha =0.8967 and satisfactory goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.030, 90% CI: 0.019-0.039, pclose=1.000; chi-square=424.98, p=0.002; CFI=0.966, TLI=0.960). Conclusion: In the tool's original form, the face validity was lacking despite satisfactory scores on item clarity. Content validity was adequate, while construct validity required modifications in construct specifications. Reliability was adequate before and after specification modifications. The modified version has adequate psychometric properties for Uganda.

An Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescription Rationality at Lower Primary Healthcare Facilities in Three Districts of South-Western Uganda.

Purpose: Antimicrobial resistance is now one of the leading five causes of death globally. This study evaluated the rationality of antibiotic prescriptions at lower primary care levels in three districts of Southwestern Uganda. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study reviewed 9899 antibiotic prescriptions at 39 health centers following a drug delivery cycle by National Medical Stores in three phases (19 days each on average). Phase 1 started 3 days after delivery, mid-way (Phase 2) and towards the end (Phase 3). The proportion of rationally prescribed antibiotics was determined using a modified criterion by Badar and in reference to Uganda Clinical Guidelines (UCG). Using multivariate logistic regression, the factors associated with rational prescription were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Seven of every 10 antibiotic prescriptions were irrational. Half the prescriptions were made by unauthorized personnel (nurses) and many of the pediatric prescriptions (916, 46.5%) did not bear body weight measurements to guide appropriate dosing. Also, the proportion of rational prescriptions in reference to UCG, 2016 was very low (3387, 34.2%). However, a high proportion of antibiotic prescriptions were legibly written (9462, 95.7%), prescribed by generic names (9083, 91.8%) and had a diagnosis (9677, 97.8%) indicated. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that; availability of medicines (phase 1) (phase 2 AOR=1.14, 95% CI:1.02-1.28, phase 3, AOR=1.23, 95% CI:1.1-1.38), legibly written prescription (AOR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.78), indication of a date on the prescription (AOR=0.56, 95% CI0.38-0.81) and being a medical officer were factors associated with rational antibiotic prescription. Conclusion: We observed a high rate of irrational prescription in the study sites and the majority of these were by unauthorized personnel. A review of antibiotic use policies and focused interventions is crucial in these settings.

Application of the anatomical chemical system/defined daily doses: Challenges and way forward for resource-limited countries.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification/Defined Daily Doses (ATC/DDD) methodology is a WHO gold standard for ensuring systematic Drug Utilization Research (DUR) and has been mainly used in the developed world. This article examines the challenges and way forward for using this methodology in resource-limited countries. CONTENT: The ATC/DDD is superior over other methods employed in DUR as it offers a unified medicines regulation and management system at all care levels. The ATC/DDD allows access to standardized and validated information on DUR by: assessing patterns of utilization, defining optimal use levels, identification of gaps, aggregating and analysing statistics for reporting adverse drug reactions, as well as assisting in developing rational medicines use interventions and monitoring their outcomes. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Application of the ATC/DDD methodology is crucial for improved patient management, optimal consumption of national pharmaceutical budgets and policy formulation in resource-limited countries.