Prospective, randomized comparison of the use of FloShield Air System® versus the reference technique (water + povidone-iodine solution) during gynecologic endoscopic surgery to evaluate the operative lens vision quality.

BACKGROUND: The FloShield Air System® is a new device for laparoscopic surgery that utilizes a continuous dry CO2 gas flow over the scope to defog the lens and protect it from condensation, debris and smoke. We set out to compare the performance and efficiency of the device in terms of operative lens vision quality (OLVQ) with the reference technique (water + povidone-iodine (PVI) solution) during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center randomized prospective study between March and June 2016 (Trials Database Registration NCT02702531) including 53 patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery with water + PVI solution and 51 patients who underwent surgical procedures with the FloShield Air System. The primary outcome measure was the number of laparoscope removals during surgery. Secondary outcome measures were the time to clean, assessment of the quality of vision, the correlation between the laparoscopic surgical complexity and outcomes, and cost effectiveness. RESULTS: Overall, the mean patient age was 43.2 years (range 22-86) and body mass index 24.8 (range 16.8-42.7). The mean number of endoscope removals during surgery was 7.0 (range 0-37) in the water + PVI solution arm and 2.8 (range 0-12) in the FloShield Air System® arm. The number of removals was significantly lower in the FloShield arm (p < 0.001). No difference in time to clean, quality of vision, level of laparoscopic procedure complexity, or cost was observed between the groups. CONSLUSIONS: The FloShield Air System® resulted in fewer laparoscopic lens removals than the water + PVI solution solution, but that there was no difference in quality of vision, cleaning time or cost, especially for the more complex surgery.

Nomogram to predict live birth rate after fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumours.

STUDY QUESTION: Can a nomogram be used to predict the individual probability of live birth (LB) in women with borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) receiving primary fertility-sparing surgery? SUMMARY ANSWER: A nomogram built according to the woman's age, histological subtype (serous versus mucinous), type of ovarian surgical treatment and FIGO stage can accurately predict the probability of LB in women with BOT. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Current prediction models determine the probability of pregnancy after medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and form the basis of patient counselling to guide the decision as to whether to consider in vitro fertilization but do not take into account prediction of the LB rate. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective multi-centre study including 187 women with fertility-sparing surgery for BOT diagnosed between January 1980 and December 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression analysis of selected factors and a nomogram to predict the subsequent LB rate was constructed. A bootstrapping technique was used for internal validation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Fifty-one women had LB (27.3%). Taking into account multiple pregnancies, the overall LB rate was 40.1% (75/187). Federation International of Gynaecology and Obstetric (FIGO) stage, age at diagnosis, histological subtype and surgery type were included in the nomogram. The predictive model had an AUC of 0.742 (95% CI, 0.644-0.825) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.621-0.805) before and after the 200 repetitions of bootstrap sample corrections, respectively, and showed a good calibration. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of the study cannot exclude all biases. Our nomogram is based on simple criteria, but did not take into account the evaluation of ovarian reserve. It demonstrates a fair relevance, but requires external validation before routine use. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Clinicians are increasingly interested in such tools to support the patient in making an informed decision about treatment options. This nomogram contributes to the decision-making by defining simple risk factors of poor LB probability that can help identify good candidates for MAR. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Effect of induced peritoneal endometriosis on oocyte and embryo quality in a mouse model.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of peritoneal endometriosis on oocyte and embryo quality in a mouse model. METHODS: Peritoneal endometriosis was surgically induced in 33 B6CBA/F1 female mice (endometriosis group, N = 17) and sham-operated were used as control (sham group, N = 16). Mice were superovulated 4 weeks after surgery and mated or not, to collect E0.5-embryos or MII-oocytes. Evaluation of oocyte and zygote quality was done by immunofluorescence under spinning disk confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Endometriosis-like lesions were observed in all mice of endometriosis group. In both groups, a similar mean number of MII oocytes per mouse was observed in non-mated mice (30.2 vs 32.6), with a lower proportion of normal oocytes in the endometriosis group (61 vs 83 %, p < 0.0001). Abnormalities were incomplete extrusion or division of the first polar body and spindle abnormalities. The mean number of zygotes per mouse was lower in the endometriosis group (21 vs 35.5, p = 0.02) without difference in embryo quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that induced peritoneal endometriosis in a mouse model is associated with a decrease in oocyte quality and embryo number. This experimental model allows further studies to understand mechanisms of endometriosis-associated infertility.

Pregnancy affects morphology of induced endometriotic lesions in a mouse model through alteration of proliferation and angiogenesis.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy is known to alleviate the symptoms of endometriosis and is also known to be a pro-angiogenic condition affecting blood and lymphatic vessels. However, angiogenesis actively participates in the development of endometriosis. The objective of our study was to study the impact of pregnancy on endometriotic tissue. Study design We performed a cross-sectional, control versus treatment study in a mouse model of endometriosis. Thirty-one female C57Bl6 mice were mated and became pregnant and 31 females were not mated and served as control. Intraperitoneal endometriotic lesions were surgically induced in C57Bl6 mice which were subsequently mated or not (group P: pregnant, group NP: non-pregnant). P and NP mice were sacrificed on day E15.5 of the pregnancy of P mice and lesions were harvested. Lesions were weighed and analyzed by histology, immunohistology, flow cytometry and real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). RESULTS: Pregnancy reduced lesion weight, decreased the proportion of cystic component (0.02 vs. 0.4; p<0.001) and modified the architecture of peritoneal endometriotic lesions. Pregnancy also increased cell proliferation in both stromal and glandular tissue as shown by the increase in Ki 67-positive cells in the P group (glandular: 19 vs. 3.9%, p<0.001; stromal: 8.7 vs. 3.3%, p<0.01). Finally, pregnancy increased angiogenesis in endometriotic lesions as indicated by an increased microvessel density (CD-31 and LYVE-1 stainings: respectively 2.2 vs. 5.1%, p<0.01 and 0.4 vs. 0.9%, p<0.001), an increased number of LYVE1 positive cells evaluated by flow cytometry (18.9 vs. 4.6%, p<0.05) and a rise in VEGF-A, -R2 and -R3 RNA expression shown by qRT-PCR (p<0.001; p<0.01; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These challenging results provide insight in understanding the pathophysiology of endometriosis and evoke a correlation between lesion architecture and symptomatology.