["Getting to zero infections" in hemodialysis]. / "Getting to zero infections" in emodialisi: un obiettivo raggiungibile. Ruolo della formazione del personale sanitario e dell'impiego di nuovi presidi nella prevenzione delle infezioni cvc correlate.

INTRODUCTION: We describe two measures adopted in hemodialysis outpatient population in order to reduce Central Venous Catheter (CVC) related infections. The first is a nurse staff training in the field project and the second deals with the employment of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing devices. These actions were performed after high infection rates were observed through a dedicated register. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the limited assistance dialysis center, direct observation (12/2012-02/2013) quantified the gap between the observed and expected health care behaviour. Training needs were defined and a 40 hours nurse staff training in the field was performed on two occasions. In the hospital dialysis center, we introduced alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine solution and chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing devices to the exit site (CHG-Tegaderm and BioPatch). Infections (cumulatively bacteremia/sepsis/skin exit/subcutaneous tunnel) were monitored continuously. RESULTS: Infection rates at the two locations were progressively reduced, reaching a value of zero at the limited assistance center. Nurse staff training in the field produced: two patient reports and three CVC management protocols, Italian language translation of the "The 5 moments of dialysis" WHO poster, alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine adoption to exit-site medication and improvement of environment cleaning/sanitation actions. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that continuously monitoring infection rates represents the first step for timely corrective action. The continuous updating of health personnel, codified prevention measures and an ongoing commitment to raise awareness in a routine practice, allows us to obtain the goal of "getting to zero infections". The staff training produced equal or superior results compared to the isolated use of new chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing devices.

[What if it is not an acute pyelonephritis? A monocentric experience of renal infarcts]. / Quando non è una pielonefrite acuta: esperienza monocentrica di infarti renali.

BACKGROUND: Often the reduced contrast enhancement on CT renal imaging is radiologically interpreted as acute pyelonephritis (PNA), but it is the task of the clinician to assess a possible differential diagnosis such as a renal infarct and look for a cause. METHODS: In our experience (2010-2013), we hospitalized 51 patients with radiological imaging consistent with acute pyelonephritis in native kidneys. However, three of these cases result, after a second look, to be ischemic lesions, only sometimes complicated by over-infections (Tabella 1). FIRST CASE: a woman hospitalized for fever and flank pain with blood culture positive for Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Antibiotic therapy allowed a clinical-laboratory improvement, but after 45 days persisted a focal wedge to the CT scan. The labs showed a anemia due to a sickle cell disease (SLC). The overview was finally interpreted as a renal infarct secondary to a sickle cell anemia, initially complicated by over-infection. SECOND CASE: a men hospitalized for a acute flank pain. The CT scan showed a left renal infarct and a partial renal artery thrombosis, resulting in abuse of cannabinoids and LAC positivity.Third case: a woman hospitalized for flank pain and slight movement of inflammatory markers. CT showed a cuneiform area in the right kidney not vascularized, that did not resolved after prolonged antibiotic therapy. The labs evidence a heterozygous mutation of prothrombin and MTHFR causing the renal infarction. CONCLUSIONS: 6% of radiographic imaging consistent with acute pyelonephritis concealed an underlying infarct, due to a unknown state of thrombophilia. The presence of hypovascular imaging to the TC scan, therefore, requires a differential diagnosis between PNA and infarct, especially in the case of atypical development.