Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(1): 85-93, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34217851

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of vaginal dinoprostone administration before office hysteroscopy (OH) in nulliparous women. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 180 nulliparous women undergoing diagnostic OH. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly allocated the women to long-interval or short-interval dinoprostone groups: three mg dinoprostone was administered vaginally 12 hours before OH in the long-interval group and 3 hours before OH in the short-interval group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was pain during OH measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (0 = no pain; 100 = worst pain imaginable). The secondary outcomes were ease of hysteroscope passage, patient satisfaction score, and drug-related adverse effects. The patients in the long-interval dinoprostone group had lower pain scores during OH (p <.001). Contrarily, pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar in both groups (p = .1). The patient satisfaction score was higher and clinicians found hysteroscope passage through the cervical canal easier and quicker in the long-interval dinoprostone group than in the short-interval group (p <.001, p = .003, and p <.001, respectively). Side effects were comparable in both study groups. CONCLUSION: Vaginal dinoprostone administered 12 hours before OH was more effective than that administered 3 hours before OH in reducing pain during OH in nulliparous women, with easier hysteroscope insertion, shorter procedure duration, and higher patient satisfaction score.


Assuntos
Misoprostol , Ocitócicos , Administração Intravaginal , Dinoprostona , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Gravidez
2.
Menopause ; 28(11): 1316-1322, 2021 08 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34374686

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: The research of new therapeutic modalities, especially with energy-based devices, has been increasing nowadays for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) management. Microablative fractional CO2 laser has been used for pelvic floor dysfunction management. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare fractional CO2 laser therapy versus sham therapy for GSM management. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched for the available randomized clinical trials in Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus during March 2021. We included randomized clinical trials that compared CO2 laser to sham among postmenopausal women with GSM diagnosis. We extracted the available data from included studies and pooled them in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Our main outcomes were total vaginal score assessment using the Vaginal Assessment Scale, sexual function using the Female Sexual Function Index, urinary symptoms using the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6, and satisfaction. FINDINGS: Three studies met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 164 women. The CO2 laser was linked to a significant reduction in Vaginal Assessment Scale score when compared with the sham group (mean difference [MD] = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.75 to -0.22], P = 0.004). The CO2 laser was associated with a significant improvement in Female Sexual Function Index score in comparison with sham group (MD = 9.37, 95% CI [6.59-12.14], P < 0.001). In addition, a significant reduction in Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 score was reported among the CO2 laser group (MD = -6.95, 95% CI [-13.24 to -0.67], P = 0.03). More women were significantly satisfied among the CO2 laser group (risk ratio  = 1.98, 95% CI [1.36-2.89], P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: CO2 laser therapy is a promising alternative for GSM management. Further randomized trials with larger sample sizes are required to confirm our findings.


Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Lasers de Gás , Dióxido de Carbono , Feminino , Humanos , Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Menopausa , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Síndrome
3.
Fertil Steril ; 115(3): 793-801, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461754

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of carbetocin versus placebo in decreasing intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion during abdominal myomectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital from September 2019 to February 2020. PATIENT(S): A total of 138 women with symptomatic leiomyoma who were candidates for abdominal myomectomy (n = 69 in each group). INTERVENTION(S): We randomized the study participants in a 1:1 ratio to carbetocin and placebo groups. Intravenous 100 µg carbetocin or placebo was administered slowly after induction of anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, postoperative hemoglobin, operative time, length of hospitalization, and drug side-effects. RESULT(S): The baseline characteristics were similar among all groups. Carbetocin had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss compared with placebo (mean difference 184 mL). Hemoglobin level 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the placebo group than in the carbetocin group (9.1 ± 0.8 vs. 10.3 ± 0.6 g/dL). Eight women in the carbetocin group needed blood transfusion compared with 17 in placebo group. Operative time, length of hospitalization, and side-effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): A single preoperative intravenous dose of 100 µg carbetocin is a simple, practical, and effective method of decreasing intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion during abdominal myomectomy, with tolerable, few, nonsignificant side-effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04083625.


Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Ocitocina/análogos & derivados , Miomectomia Uterina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Adulto , Preparações de Ação Retardada/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Leiomioma/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocitocina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Miomectomia Uterina/tendências , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamento farmacológico
4.
Fertil Steril ; 114(4): 861-868, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE(S): To assess efficacy and safety of self-administered 3 mg dinoprostone vaginally in reducing pain during copper intrauterine device (IUD) insertion in parous women. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Family planning clinic in a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENT(S): Multiparous women who were attending a family planning clinic and requesting copper IUD insertion. INTERVENTIONS(S): We randomly assigned 160 participants into two groups: The dinoprostone group (n = 80) received 3 mg dinoprostone vaginally, and the placebo group (n = 80) received placebo vaginally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Our primary outcome was mean pain scores during IUD insertion. Our secondary outcomes were mean pain scores during tenaculum application, during uterine sounding, and 15 minutes after insertion, ease of insertion, satisfaction score, need for additional analgesics, and side-effects. RESULT(S): Both groups showed no significant difference in anticipated pain score (P=.41), pain during tenaculum placement (P=.22), and pain during sound insertion (P=.07). The dinoprostone group had significantly lower pain scores during IUD insertion (34.8 ± 10.1 vs. 57.8 ± 11.8) and 15 minutes after insertion (20.6 ± 6.4 vs. 29.6 ± 6.2), easier IUD insertion (43.6 ± 21.9 vs. 64.7 ± 18.1), and higher satisfaction (83.9 ± 11.6 vs. 63.0 ± 9.1) compared with the placebo group. Fewer patients required additional analgesics in the dinoprostone group compared with the placebo group (P=.01). Side-effects were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION(S): Self-administered 3 mg dinoprostone vaginally before copper IUD insertion in parous women reduces pain scores during IUD insertion, making insertion easier and increasing women's satisfaction, with tolerable side-effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04046302.


Assuntos
Dinoprostona/administração & dosagem , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Percepção da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Paridade/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intravaginal , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efeitos adversos , Percepção da Dor/fisiologia , Paridade/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Autoadministração , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...