Transfemoral Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in a Patient With Previous Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR).

A 90-year-old man presented with increasing exertional breathlessness. He had previous implantation of a Perimount bioprosthetic aortic valve (Edwards Lifesciences) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Due to severe transvalvular bioprosthetic regurgitation with preserved left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction, the heart team decided on valve-in- valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral route in view of the patient's prohibitively high surgical and anesthetic risk. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery and was symptomatically much improved at 3-month follow-up.

Cryoablation compared with radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: analysis of factors contributing to acute and follow-up outcome.

AIMS: The efficacy of transvenous Cryoablation (Cryo), for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT), when compared with radiofrequency (RF) ablation, requires further investigation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We sought to compare the acute- and follow-up results of 71 cases each of Cryo and RF for AVNRT using a retrospective matched case-control study design and aimed at identifying patient and procedural factors that may predict success with each strategy. Primary failure of Cryo (thus necessitating RF at the same sitting) was seen in 11 (15.4%) cases, whereas there were two (2.8%) primary failures with RF (P<0.01). Patients in the Cryo group had significantly higher arrhythmia recurrence [14 (19.8%)] when compared with the RF group [4 (5.6%)] (P<0.01). The incidence of recurrence following Cryo was significantly higher if an echo beat was still inducible after ablation than if complete slow pathway block was achieved (7/19, vs. 4/46, P<0.001). The median number of Cryo lesions was significantly lower in patients who had recurrence compared with those who did not (1.5 vs. 3.0, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: We have observed a much higher primary failure and recurrence rate with Cryo when compared with RF for AVNRT. It may be possible to decrease this high recurrence rate by aiming to achieve complete slow pathway block and by increasing the number of Cryo lesions.

Catheter inversion: a technique to complete isthmus ablation and cure atrial flutter.

Cure of typical atrial flutter (AFL) by catheter ablation to produce bidirectional block across the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cava isthmus (IS) is highly effective, but failures may occur. We describe a technique that may allow creation of bidirectional block where a conventional strategy has failed. AFL ablation was performed using the conventional approach with a mapping/ablation (ablation) catheter introduced via the right femoral vein (RFV) to create a line of bidirectional block across the IS. If this was not achieved after five passes of the ablation catheter from the tricuspid annulus to the inferior vena cava (IVC) a catheter inversion technique was used. This allowed stable positioning of the ablation catheter at the IVC end of the isthmus. In 11 patients, a mean of 17 (range 3 to 45) radiofrequency (RF) applications was given before the catheter inversion technique was applied. Following catheter inversion a mean of 4 (1 to 14) further RF applications achieved bidirectional isthmus block in every patient. No complications occurred. Catheter inversion provides a simple, safe, and effective means of achieving bidirectional isthmus conduction block in cases where a conventional ablation strategy might have failed.

Electroanatomic versus fluoroscopic mapping for catheter ablation procedures: a prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the routine use of electroanatomic imaging (CARTO) with that of conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping (conventional) in an unselected population referred for catheter ablation. We sought to compare the two approaches with respect to procedure outcome and duration, radiation exposure, and cost. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients undergoing catheter ablation (with the exception of complete AV nodal ablation) were prospectively randomized to either a CARTO or conventional procedure for mapping and ablation. One hundred two patients were randomized. Acute procedural success was similar with either strategy (CARTO vs conventional 43/47 vs 51/55, P > 0.5), as was procedure duration (144 [58] vs 125 [48] min, P = 0.07 (mean [SD]). CARTO was associated with a substantial reduction in fluoroscopy time (9.3 [7.6] vs 28.8 [19.5] min, P < 0.001) and radiation dose (6.2 [6.1] vs 20.8 [32.7] Gray, P = 0.003). CARTO cases used fewer catheters (2.5 [0.7] vs 4.4 [1.1], P < 0.001), but catheter costs were higher (13.8 vs 9.3 units, P < 0.001, where one unit is equivalent to the cost of a nonsteerable quadripolar catheter). CONCLUSION: For all catheter ablation procedures, even when a center's "learning curve" for CARTO is included, procedure duration and outcome are similar for CARTO and conventional procedures. CARTO is associated with drastically reduced fluoroscopy time and radiation dose. Although fewer catheters are used with CARTO, catheter costs remain higher.