Mpox-Induced Proctitis.

Introduction: Mpox, formerly known as monkeypox, is a zoonotic virus in the genus Orthopoxvirus, which has a variable incubation period and an extensive array of symptoms. While those infected with Mpox have displayed generalized viral prodromal symptoms, atypical symptoms such as proctitis have also been seen. Proctitis associated with Mpox is a relatively infrequent initial presenting symptom with a reported incidence of 14-32.9% that has seen an uptick in prevalence since the 2022 global endemic. Case Presentation: We present a confirmed case of Mpox in a 27-year-old male who presented with 3 days of intermittent anorectal bleeding and various forms of cutaneous lesions at different stages of healing. He had engaged in unprotected sexual intercourse 8 days prior to the onset of his symptoms in New York, which at the time was the epicenter of the endemic. Computed tomography imaging showed thickening of the rectum with associated lymphadenopathy, consistent with findings of acute proctitis. Conclusion: The intent of this case report is to acknowledge the prevalence of the Mpox virus. Since the endemic, increased cases of Mpox have led to more complications that have been identified and studied by public health experts. The complication of proctitis due to Mpox in a certain subset of patients is important to fully understand that while this virus presents with a generalized prodrome like other viruses, these unique gastrointestinal presentations and findings may be the first step in identifying this infection and ensuring rapid treatment if future endemics arrive.

Appropriate cleaning reduces potential risk of spore transmission from patients with Clostridioides difficile infection treated in outpatient infusion centers.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) who receive treatment at outpatient infusion centers (OICs) pose a risk for spore transmission. We investigated C. difficile contamination in the environment of CDI and non-CDI patients and evaluated the effectiveness of standard cleaning. METHODS: This is a multicenter, non-conventional study including 8 OICs between October 2019 and December 2020. Samples were collected at baseline, after infusion, and after cleaning CDI and non-CDI areas. Cleaning was performed using hypochlorite and non-hypochlorite products for CDI and non-CDI, respectively. Samples were cultured for toxigenic C. difficile and strain-typed via fluorescent PCR ribotyping and whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: The overall C. difficile contamination rate was 7.9% (156/1969) with 8.1% in patient and 5.6% in non-patient care areas, respectively. For CDI areas, contamination rates were 5.9% at baseline, 15.0% after infusion, and significantly reduced to 6.2% after cleaning (P = 0.004). For non-CDI areas, contamination was similar at baseline (9.5%), after infusion (7.6%), and after cleaning (4.3%). The difference in C. difficile-positive samples after infusion was significant for CDI vs. non-CDI (15.0% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.004). Overall contamination was 11.5% for floors, 7.9% for infusion chairs, and 3.8% for equipment (P = 0.001). The most frequent ribotypes were F014-020 (42.6%), F106 (15.6%), F255 (6.1%), F001 (5.2%) and F027 (3.5%). Cleaning resulted in elimination of F106, F255, F001, F027 and partial reduction of F014-020. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental C. difficile contamination was increased after CDI infusions and significantly reduced after cleaning with a hypochlorite solution, reducing the potential risk of spore transmission to others.

Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection worsens anxiety-related patient-reported quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high recurrence rates impacting health-related quality of life (HrQOL). However, patient-reported data are lacking particularly in the outpatient setting. We assessed changes in HrQOL over time in patients treated with bezlotoxumab at US infusion centers and determined clinical factors associated with HrQOL changes. METHODS: The HrQOL survey was conducted in adult patients with CDI, who received bezlotoxumab in 25 US outpatient infusion centers. The survey was adapted from the Cdiff32 instrument to assess anxiety-related changes to HrQOL and completed on the day of infusion (baseline) and at 90 days post bezlotoxumab (follow-up). Demographics, disease history, CDI risk factors, and recurrence of CDI (rCDI) at 90-day follow-up were collected. Changes in HrQOL scores were calculated and outcomes assessed using a multivariable linear regression model with P < 0.05 defined as statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (mean age: 68 ± 15 years, 63% female, median Charlson index: 4, 15.9% rCDI) were included. The overall mean baseline and follow-up HrQOL scores were 26.4 ± 11.5 and 56.4 ± 25.0, respectively. At follow-up, this score was significantly higher for patients who had primary CDI (34.5 ± 21.7) compared to those with multiple rCDI (24.7 ± 21.0; P = 0.039). The mean HrQOL change at follow-up was significantly higher for patients without rCDI (34.1 ± 28.8 increase) compared to patients with rCDI (6.7 ± 19.5 increase; P < 0.001), indicating improvement in anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Cdiff32 instrument, we demonstrated that HrQOL worsened significantly in patients with further rCDI. These findings support the use of Cdiff32 in assessing CDI-related humanistic outcomes.

A Narrative Review of the Clinical Practicalities of Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab Antibody Therapies for SARS-CoV-2.

The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ranges from mild to death, with high morbidity and mortality rates reported amongst a vulnerable subset of patients termed high risk. While vaccines remain the primary option for COVID-19 prevention, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as bamlanivimab and etesevimab, have been shown to benefit certain subpopulations after exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Unlike vaccine-derived immunity that develops over time, administration of neutralizing mAbs is an immediate and passive immunotherapy, with the potential to reduce disease progression, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and death. Bamlanivimab alone and together with etesevimab hold emergency use authorizations in several countries globally, with countries increasingly transitioning to the use of bamlanivimab and etesevimab together and other authorized mAbs on the basis of their evolving variant landscape, regulatory authorizations, and access to drugs. The current guidelines for the administration of bamlanivimab alone or together with etesevimab are informed by an iterative process of testing and development. Herein the rationale for these guidelines is provided by sharing the learnings that have been gathered throughout the development process of these mAbs. In addition, this review addresses the most common clinical questions received from health care professionals (HCPs) and patients regarding indicated population, dose, use with other medications and vaccines, duration of protection, and variants in clinical practice. As prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 variants can differ by country and state, prescribing HCPs should consider the prevalence of bamlanivimab and etesevimab resistant variants in their area, where data are available, regarding potential efficacy impact when considering treatment options.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04427501; NCT04411628; NCT04497987; NCT04634409.

Using a nurse-initiated bedside tool to decrease inappropriate testing for Clostridioides difficile in hospital settings.

Overdiagnosis of Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is associated with increased hospital length of stay, antibiotic overuse, unnecessary infection prevention efforts and excess costs. This study evaluated a paper-based bedside C. difficile screening tool on the number of C. difficile laboratory tests performed and number of C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnoses. Nurses used the tool to determine whether stool should be sent for C. difficile testing. The tool provided indications for stool testing. We collected data on the number of C. difficile stool tests performed and CDI diagnoses for nine months before (PreT) and after (PostT) tool implementation in the hospital. We found a 31% reduction in the mean monthly number of C. difficile tests performed (37 PreT to 25 PostT) and a 56% reduction in CDI diagnoses (19 PreT to 8 PostT). This study demonstrates the success of using nurses and a bedside tool to decrease inappropriate C. difficile testing. This intervention has implications for patient management, infection prevention and cost containment. This low-cost paper-based tool may be helpful for the 25% of hospitals in the USA not using clinical decision support in their electronic health record (EHR), as well as for hospitals outside the United States who may not have access to EHRs.

Real-world Experience of Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Bezlotoxumab is approved for prevention of recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in adults receiving standard of care (SoC) therapy based on findings from MODIFY clinical trials. However, utilization practices and validation of trial results in the real world are limited. METHODS: Records of patients receiving bezlotoxumab between April 2017 and December 2018 across 34 infusion centers in the United States were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrent CDI (rCDI), defined as diarrhea lasting ≥2 days resulting in treatment, was assessed 90 days postbezlotoxumab. RESULTS: The study cohort included 200 patients (median age, 70 years; 66% female; median Charlson comorbidity index, 5), of whom 86% (n = 173) had prior CDI episodes and 79% (n = 158) had ≥2 risk factors for rCDI. SoC antibiotics included vancomycin (n = 137, 68%), fidaxomicin (n = 60, 30%), and metronidazole (n = 3, 2%). Median time from C. difficile stool test to bezlotoxumab and initiation of SoC to bezlotoxumab were 15 days and 11 days, respectively. Within 90 days, 31 of 195 patients (15.9%) experienced rCDI, which corresponds to a success rate of 84.1%. Patients with ≥2 CDI recurrences prebezlotoxumab had a higher risk of subsequent rCDI compared with those with 1 recurrence or primary CDI (hazard ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-6.76; P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world multicenter study demonstrated successful prevention of rCDI with bezlotoxumab comparable to clinical trial results regardless of type of SoC and timing of infusion. Multiple prior CDI recurrences were associated with a higher risk of subsequent rCDI, supporting the use of bezlotoxumab earlier in the disease course.

The role of beta-hemolytic streptococci in causing diffuse, nonculturable cellulitis: a prospective investigation.

Staphylococcus aureus and beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) are the 2 main types of bacteria causing soft-tissue infections. Historically, BHS were believed to be the primary cause of diffuse, nonculturable cellulitis. However, with the recent epidemic of community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) causing culturable soft-tissue infections, it is currently unclear what role either of these bacteria has in cases where the cellulitis is diffuse and nonculturable. This uncertainty has led to broad-spectrum and haphazard use of antibiotics for this infection type, which has led to increased risk of adverse drug reactions, health care costs, and emergence of resistance in bacteria. To investigate this issue, we conducted a prospective investigation between December 2004 and June 2007, enrolling all adult patients admitted to the inpatient service at the Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, a county hospital of Los Angeles, with diffuse, nonculturable cellulitis. Acute and convalescent serologies for anti-streptolysin-O and anti-DNase-B antibodies were obtained. Patient data were analyzed for response to beta-lactam antibiotics. The primary outcome was the proportion of these cases caused by BHS, as diagnosed by serologies and/or blood cultures, and the secondary outcome was the response rate of patients to beta-lactam antibiotics. Of 248 patients enrolled, 69 were dropped from analysis because of loss to follow-up or exclusion criteria. Of the 179 remaining patients, 73% of nonculturable cellulitis cases were caused by BHS. Analysis of outcomes to beta-lactam antibiotic treatment revealed that patients diagnosed with BHS had a 97% (71/73) response, while those who did not have BHS had a 91% (21/23) response, with an overall response rate of 95.8% (116/121). Results of this large, prospective study show that diffuse, nonculturable cellulitis is still mainly caused by BHS, despite the MRSA epidemic, and that for this infection type, treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics is still effective. A cost-effective, evidence-based algorithm can be useful for the empiric management of uncomplicated soft-tissue infections based on the presence or absence of a culturable source.

In-hospital observation after antibiotic switch in pneumonia: a national evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of in-hospital observation after the switch from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics in a large Medicare population. Retrospective studies of relatively small size indicate that the practice of in-hospital observation after the switch from IV to oral antibiotics for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is unnecessary. METHODS: We performed a retrospective examination of the US Medicare National Pneumonia Project database. Eligible patients were discharged with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis consistent with community-acquired pneumonia and divided into 2 groups: 1) a "not observed" cohort, in which patients were discharged on the same day as the switch from IV to oral antibiotics and 2) an "observed for 1 day" cohort, in which patients remained hospitalized for 1 day after the switch from IV to oral antibiotics. We compared clinical outcomes between these 2 cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 39,242 cases were sampled, representing 4341 hospitals in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. There were 5248 elderly patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria involving a length of stay of no more than 7 hospital days (2536 "not observed" and 2712 "observed for 1 day" patients). Mean length of stay was 3.8 days for the "not observed" cohort and 4.5 days for the "observed for 1 day" cohort (P <.0001). There was no significant difference in 14-day hospital readmission rate (7.8% in the "not observed" cohort vs 7.2% "observed for 1 day" cohort, odds ratio 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.12; P =.367) and 30-day mortality rate (5.1% "not observed" cohort vs 4.4% in the "observed for 1 day" cohort, odds ratio 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.11; P =.258) between the "not observed" and "observed for 1 day" cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of the US Medicare Pneumonia Project database provides further evidence that the routine practice of in-hospital observation after the switch from IV to oral antibiotics for patients with CAP may be avoided in patients who are clinically stable although these findings should be verified in a large randomized controlled trial.