A cost-minimisation analysis comparing photoselective vaporisation (PVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Queensland, Australia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the costs of photoselective vaporisation (PVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from the perspective of a Queensland public hospital provider. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A decision-analytic model was used to compare the costs of PVP and TURP. Cost inputs were sourced from an audit of patients undergoing PVP or TURP across three hospitals. The probability of re-intervention was obtained from secondary literature sources. Probabilistic and multi-way sensitivity analyses were used to account for uncertainty and test the impact of varying key assumptions. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, which included equipment, training and re-intervention costs, PVP was AU$ 739 (95% credible interval [CrI] -12 187 to 14 516) more costly per patient than TURP. The estimate was most sensitive to changes in procedural costs, fibre costs and the probability of re-intervention. Sensitivity analyses based on data from the most favourable site or excluding equipment and training costs reduced the point estimate to favour PVP (incremental cost AU$ -684, 95% CrI -8319 to 5796 and AU$ -100, 95% CrI -13 026 to 13 678, respectively). However, CrIs were wide for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this cost minimisation analysis, there was no significant cost difference between PVP and TURP, after accounting for equipment, training and re-intervention costs. However, PVP was associated with a shorter length of stay and lower procedural costs during audit, indicating PVP potentially provides comparatively good value for money once the technology is established.

Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: a phase I study.

PURPOSE: Photodynamic therapy, using a photosensitizing drug activated by red light, can destroy localized areas of cancer with safe healing and without the cumulative toxicity associated with ionizing radiation. We used photodynamic therapy in a phase I-II study to treat patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with an increasing prostate specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy proven local recurrence after radiotherapy were offered photodynamic therapy. Three days after intravenous administration of the photosensitizer meso-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorin, light was applied using optical fibers inserted percutaneously through perineal needles positioned in the prostate with imaging guidance. Patients were followed with PSA measurements, prostate biopsies, computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and questionnaires on urinary and sexual function. RESULTS: Photodynamic therapy was given to 14 men using high light doses in 13. Treatment was well tolerated. PSA decreased in 9 patients (to undetectable levels in 2) and 5 had no viable tumor on posttreatment biopsies. After photodynamic therapy, contrast enhanced computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging showed necrosis involving up to 91% of the prostate cross section. In 4 men stress incontinence developed (troublesome in 2 and mild in 2) which is slowly improving. Sexual potency was impaired in 4 of the 7 men able to have intercourse before photodynamic therapy, which did not improve. There were no rectal complications directly related to photodynamic therapy, but in 1 patient a urethrorectal fistula developed following an ill-advised rectal biopsy 1 month after therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy is a new option that could be suitable for organ confined prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy. With more precise light dosimetry, it may be possible to destroy essentially all glandular tissue within the prostate with few complications. These results suggest that photodynamic therapy merits further investigation.