The use of hormonal treatments to improve the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows in feedlot or pasture-based management systems.

Hormonal interventions have been used to increase the probability of estrous detection and insemination, and to increase pregnancy rates of dairy cattle under a variety of management systems. The present review addresses the basic principles of hormonal intervention and presents typical examples that illustrate the methodology. The hormones used to control the estrous cycle mimic the reproductive hormones found within the normal cow. Most estrous synchronization systems employ a method for controlling follicular wave development, promoting ovulation in anestrous cows, regressing the corpus luteum in cyclic cows, and synchronizing estrus and (or) ovulation at the end of treatment. A wide range of reproductive systems are in place on dairy farms. In most herds, a non-intervention period is practiced where postpartum cows are observed estrus estrus. Cows not observed in estrus are then treated. A number of studies in pasture-based and confinement systems have demonstrated net benefits of whole-herd synchronization. Despite the advantages of whole-herd reproductive programs, their uptake has been inconsistent globally. The benefits of a timed artificial insemination (AI) system increase under conditions of poor estrous detection rate and poor conception rate. The unpopular nature of timed AI programs in pasture-fed cows relates to high rates of estrous detection and conception for pasture-based dairying. Regardless of production system, some cows must be re-inseminated because they are not pregnant after first insemination. The presence of "phantom cows" (non-pregnant cows that do not return to estrus) creates a serious reproductive challenge for both pasture-based and confinement-style operations. Early pregnancy diagnosis and second insemination timed AI may reduce the effects of phantom cows on dairy herds. Fundamental research into anestrous, the hormonal control of the estrous cycle, and early pregnancy detection should elucidate new methods that can be used to strengthen reproductive programs on dairy farms.

Accuracy of bovine pregnancy detection using transrectal ultrasonography at 28 to 35 days after insemination.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of real-time ultrasonography to detect pregnancy in dairy cows at 28 to 35 days after insemination. METHODS: Cows that did not return to oestrus between 18 and 24 days after a first insemination (n = 526) were examined by transrectal ultrasonography from 28 to 35 days after insemination. Pregnancy was confirmed by the observation of a foetus, but fluid in the uterine horn and the presence of embryonic membranes were also noted. When pregnancy was not confirmed by the observation of a foetus, a second examination 7 days later, confirmed these remaining cows as pregnant or not pregnant to the first insemination. Detection of pregnancy at this early examination was compared with manual transrectal pregnancy examination performed 10 to 13 weeks after insemination (13-week examination). RESULTS: There were 44% of cows that were pregnant to the first service, 34% that had returned for a second service 18 to 24 days after the first insemination, and 20% of cows that were not pregnant, and had not returned normally for a second service (non-pregnant, non-return) within 24 days of their initial insemination. The presence of a foetus at 28 to 35 days after insemination was accurately predicted by a simplified method where uterine fluid accumulation and embryonic membranes were observed. Foetal loss between the early detection and the 13-week examination (9% of pregnancies) indicated that 28 to 35 days post insemination was too early to reliably detect pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Early examination of pregnancy with transrectal ultrasonography is an accurate method to identify non-pregnant, non-return cows. The examination can be simplified by the observation of uterine fluid accumulation and embryonic membranes, as opposed to the more involved process of observing the foetus.

Hormonal and ovarian responses to a 5-day progesterone treatment in anoestrous dairy cows in the third week post-partum.

Primiparous cows with low body condition at calving have an extended anovulatory period. Induction of ovulation and oestrus is possible with progesterone treatment but the response to this treatment differs between Friesian and Jersey breeds. The objective of this study was to describe changes in pulsatile LH secretion and the synchrony of developing ovarian follicles that occur during a progesterone treatment period of 5 days in primiparous anovulatory cows. The experimental model compared the progesterone treatment with spontaneous post-partum changes as well as a breed comparison in a factorial design.Thirty-six cows (Jersey n=19 and Friesian n=17) were managed to calve with a low body condition score (BCS<4. 5). Daily changes in ovarian follicle size were observed with transrectal ultrasonography in each cow from 8 days post-partum. Thirty of these cows were diagnosed to be anovulatory at 12-18 days post-partum (day 0) and allocated to a treatment (n=16) or a control group (n=14), balanced for breed. Each treated cow had a progesterone-releasing controlled internal drug-releasing (CIDR) device inserted vaginally for 5 days while control cows were left untreated. Changes in plasma LH concentrations were measured with intensive blood sampling over 8 h on days -1, 1, and 4. Blood samples were also collected daily (06:00 h) for determination of plasma progesterone as well as oestradiol concentrations on days 6 and 8. Treatment with progesterone was associated with a transient initial decrease (day 1) in both LH pulse frequency and mean LH concentrations after device insertion, but both had returned to pre-treatment levels by day 4. Jersey cows had a greater pulse frequency, but there was no breed difference in mean LH concentrations. Patterns of ovarian follicle growth were affected by progesterone treatment with an increase in diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) identified after treatment initiation. This followed an earlier emergence of a new DF after device insertion. Follicular response to progesterone was dependent on the diameter of the DF present at treatment initiation. Those follicles >/=9 mm were replaced by a new DF during treatment such that the DF observed at the time of device removal was large (>/=9 mm) and growing in 13/16 cases.Progesterone was not effective for the induction of an LH surge, ovulation and oestrus in anovulatory cows with a low BCS. However, treatment was associated with synchronous development of a DF so that it was large and growing at the end of the treatment period in most cases. This synchronous development may be due to the transient suppression of LH and the presence of an LH-dependent DF.

The inter-ovarian distribution of dominant follicles is influenced by the location of the corpus luteum of pregnancy.

The objective was to characterise the distribution of dominant ovarian follicles in the early post-partum period in relation to the side of the preceding pregnancy and its relationship with the left and right ovaries. Primiparous cows were enrolled over a 2-year period (n = 33 in Year 1 and n = 28 in Year 2). Ovarian follicles were observed daily by trans-rectal ultrasonography commencing within 9 days of calving. Dominant follicles (DF) were described as occurring on the ovary ipsilateral to the CL of preceding pregnancy (ipsilateral ovary of pregnancy, IOP) or contralateral to the CL of the preceding pregnancy (contralateral ovary of pregnancy, COP), and as occurring on the left or right ovary. Results in Year 1 were analysed for the effect of breed (Friesian n = 15; Jersey n = 18). There was a bias towards the COP for the first DF post-partum in both breeds (DF1; 70%; p<0.05). A breed interaction was observed with the second DF post-partum with a bias towards the COP in the Friesian (93%; p<0.05); but not the Jersey animals (50%). In Year 2, all cows were Friesians, and there was again a biased distribution of the DF1 towards the COP (89%; p<0.05) and for the combined distribution of the first three DF post-partum (76%; p<0.05) as well as the first ovulatory follicle (71%; p<0.05). A comparison of the pooled data for the location of the DF1 from both years showed that only one DF1 was observed on a left ovary in the 29 cases where the preceding pregnancy was also on the left side. This study demonstrated a bias in the distribution of DL in the early post-partum period towards the ovary on the side opposite that of the preceding pregnancy as well as towards the right side.