Hybrid procedure in living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported a hybrid procedure that uses a combination of laparoscopic mobilization of the liver and subsequent hepatectomy under direct vision in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We present the details of this hybrid procedure and the outcomes of the procedure. METHODS: Between January 1997 and August 2014, 204 LDLTs were performed at Nagasaki University Hospital. Among them, 67 recent donors underwent hybrid donor hepatectomy. Forty-one donors underwent left hemihepatectomy, 25 underwent right hemihepatectomy, and 1 underwent posterior sectionectomy. First, an 8-cm subxiphoid midline incision was made; laparoscopic mobilization of the liver was then achieved with a hand-assist through the midline incision under the pneumoperitoneum. Thereafter, the incision was extended up to 12 cm for the right lobe and posterior sector graft and 10 cm left lobe graft procurement. Under direct vision, parenchymal transection was performed by means of the liver-hanging maneuver. The hybrid procedure for LDLT recipients was indicated only for selected cases with atrophic liver cirrhosis without a history of upper abdominal surgery, significant retroperitoneal collateral vessels, or hypertrophic change of the liver (n = 29). For total hepatectomy and splenectomy, the midline incision was sufficiently extended. RESULTS: All of the hybrid donor hepatectomies were completed without an extra subcostal incision. No significant differences were observed in the blood loss or length of the operation compared with conventional open procedures. All of the donors have returned to their preoperative activity level, with fewer wound-related complaints compared with those treated with the use of the conventional open procedure. In recipients treated with the hybrid procedure, no clinically relevant drawbacks were observed compared with the recipients treated with a regular Mercedes-Benz-type incision. CONCLUSIONS: Our hybrid procedure was safely conducted with the same quality as the conventional open procedure in both LDLT donors and recipients.

E-cadherin expression in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with previous local treatment in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of previous local treatment on the E-cadherin (E-cad) expression in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) within the Milan criteria. METHODS: Seventy-four of 204 patients with HCC underwent LDLT between 1997 and 2014. Previous local treatment for HCC was performed for 121 lesions in 47 patients (47/74, 63.5%). Histological and immunohistochemical E-cad expression analyses were conducted on the basis of the whole-liver histological examination technique. RESULTS: The interval to LDLT after the initial and last treatments was 24 months (2-206) and 10.5 months (1-58), respectively. Preoperative imaging showed necrosis in 92 (92/121, 76.0%) lesions caused by the effects of local treatment, whereas the histological examinations revealed viable HCC cells in 22 (22/92, 23.9%) lesions, demonstrating well or moderate differentiation without vascular invasion. Immunohistochemically, the expression of E-cad was maintained in 17 viable (17/22, 77.3%) lesions. There were no signs of malignant transformation or sarcomatous changes in the HCCs treated with previous therapy. The recipients who maintained an E-cad expression in the lesion with local treatment showed no recurrence or distant metastasis after LDLT. CONCLUSIONS: HCC cells remained in approximately 20% of the evaluated lesions, even those exhibiting necrosis on imaging of the explanted cirrhotic liver. However, the expression of E-cad was maintained in most of these lesions. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the rate of recurrence after LDLT between the patients who did and those did not receive previous local treatment for HCC.

The efficacy of the ImmuKnow assay for evaluating the immune status in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients.

BACKGROUND: The survival of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients has significantly improved since the introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, the mortality due to hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease has not been reduced in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, and HCV has recently become the most significant cause of death in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Liver transplantation might be one of the treatments of choice in such cases, but it is very difficult to evaluate the immune status of these patients due to ART, anti-HCV treatment, and HIV-related immunocompromised state. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune status in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients using the Cylex ImmuKnow assay, which was designed to monitor the global immune status by measuring the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels produced by activated CD4+ T cells. METHODS: Twenty-eight HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were included in this study. We evaluated their immune activity using the ImmuKnow assay, and compared the data with those of HCV mono-infected patients indicated for liver transplantation as well as healthy controls. RESULTS: The ATP levels of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were significantly higher than those of HCV mono-infected liver transplant recipients (P < .001), and were significantly lower than those of healthy controls (P = .001). CONCLUSION: The ImmuKnow assay was considered to be a useful tool to evaluate the immune status of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.