Factors Impacting Provider Treatment Decision-Making in Early Glottic Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Transoral laser microsurgery (TLMS) and radiotherapy (XRT) are mainstays of treatment for early glottic carcinoma (EGC). Here, we investigated case-dependent provider treatment preferences and identify factors which impact decision-making in EGC. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey of laryngologists, head-and-neck surgeons, and radiation oncologists presented five diagrammatic cases of progressively advanced EGC (T1/2, N0). Respondents indicated preference for TLMS or XRT and ranked factors which influenced their recommendation for each case. Analysis utilized descriptive statistics, Fischer's exact tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests for nonparametric data. RESULTS: A total of 141 complete responses (69.5% laryngologists) were received. Most respondents practiced in academic settings (93.5%) and within multidisciplinary teams (94.0%). Anterior commissure involvement was the most important a priori tumor factor for case-independent treatment recommendation (Likert Scale: 4.22/5), followed by Laterality (Likert Scale: 4.02/5). Across all specialties, TLMS was recommended for unilateral T1a lesions. Laryngologists continued recommending TLMS in T2 lesions (41.0%) more than head-and-neck surgeons (5.0%) and radiation oncologists (0.0%). Across all cases, survival and voice outcomes were the most important clinical factors impacting treatment decisions. Radiation oncologists weighed voice more heavily than laryngologists in more complex presentations of EGC (rank: 1.6 vs. 2.7, Kruskall-Wallis: p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In more complex clinical presentations of EGC, preference for TLMS compared to XRT differed across specialists, despite similar rankings of factors driving these treatment recommendations. This may be driven by differing experiences and viewpoints on case-dependent voice outcomes following TLMS versus XRT, suggesting a need for increased understanding of how tumor location and depth impact voice outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V Laryngoscope, 2024.

Artificial Intelligence in Laryngology, Broncho-Esophagology, and Sleep Surgery.

Technological advancements in laryngology, broncho-esophagology, and sleep surgery have enabled the collection of increasing amounts of complex data for diagnosis and treatment of voice, swallowing, and sleep disorders. Clinicians face challenges in efficiently synthesizing these data for personalized patient care. Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically machine learning and deep learning, offers innovative solutions for processing and interpreting these data, revolutionizing diagnosis and management in these fields, and making care more efficient and effective. In this study, we review recent AI-based innovations in the fields of laryngology, broncho-esophagology, and sleep surgery.

Preference Phenotypes in Thyroid Nodule Management: A Patient Segmentation Approach.

OBJECTIVE: Patient preferences regarding thyroid nodules are poorly understood. Our objective is to (1) employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to explore risk tradeoffs in thyroid nodule management, and (2) segment respondents into preference phenotypes. STUDY DESIGN: DCE. SETTING: Thyroid surgery clinic, online survey. METHODS: A DCE including 5 attributes (cancer risk, voice concerns, incision/scar, medication requirement, follow-up frequency) was refined with qualitative patient and physician input. A final DCE including 8 choice tasks, demographics, history, and risk tolerance was administered to participants with and without thyroid disease. Analysis was performed with multinomial logit modeling and latent class analysis (LCA) for preference phenotyping. RESULTS: A total of 1026 respondents were included; 480 had thyroid disease. Risk aversion was associated with increasing age (P < .001), female gender (P < .001), and limited education (P = .038), but not previous thyroid disease. Cancer risk most significantly impacted decision-making. Of the total possible utility change from thyroid nodule decision-making, 47.8% was attributable to variations in cancer risk; 20.0% from medication management; 14.9% from voice changes; 12.7% from incision/scar; and 4.6% from follow-up concerns. LCA demonstrated 3 classes with distinct preference phenotypes: the largest group (64.2%) made decisions primarily based on cancer risk; another group (18.2%) chose based on aversion to medication; the smallest group (17.7%) factored in medication and cancer risk evenly. CONCLUSION: Cancer risk and the need to take medication after thyroid surgery factor into patient decision-making most heavily when treating thyroid nodules. Distinct preference phenotypes were demonstrated, reinforcing the need for individual preference assessment before the treatment of thyroid disorders.

ChatGPT-4 accuracy for patient education in laryngopharyngeal reflux.

INTRODUCTION: Chatbot Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence-powered language model chatbot able to help otolaryngologists in practice and research. The ability of ChatGPT in generating patient-centered information related to laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) was evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-five questions dedicated to definition, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of LPRD were developed from the Dubai definition and management of LPRD consensus and recent reviews. Questions about the four aforementioned categories were entered into ChatGPT-4. Four board-certified laryngologists evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 with a 5-point Likert scale. Interrater reliability was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean scores (SD) of ChatGPT-4 answers for definition, clinical presentation, additional examination, and treatments were 4.13 (0.52), 4.50 (0.72), 3.75 (0.61), and 4.18 (0.47), respectively. Experts reported high interrater reliability for sub-scores (ICC = 0.973). The lowest performances of ChatGPT-4 were on answers about the most prevalent LPR signs, the most reliable objective tool for the diagnosis (hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH)), and the criteria for the diagnosis of LPR using HEMII-pH. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4 may provide adequate information on the definition of LPR, differences compared to GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), and clinical presentation. Information provided upon extra-laryngeal manifestations and HEMII-pH may need further optimization. Regarding the recent trends identifying increasing patient use of internet sources for self-education, the findings of the present study may help draw attention to ChatGPT-4's accuracy on the topic of LPR.

Increasing Prevalence of Voice Disorders in the USA: Updates in the COVID Era.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the current prevalence of voice disorders among adults in the United States; to determine the association of individual factors with voice disorders. METHODS: The 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was analyzed to identify adults reporting voice problems in the past 12 months. Demographics were assessed, as well as the duration, severity, and resolution of the voice problem. The relationship between voice problems, gender, lost workdays, and long COVID was investigated. A comparison to the 2012 NHIS was made to determine changes in voice disorder prevalence. RESULTS: 29.9 million Americans (95%CI[28.3-31.5]) annually report a voice problem, representing 12.2% of the population (95%CI[11.7-12.8%]). Overall, 26.8% and 13.2% reported the severity of their voice problem as moderate or severe, respectively. Only 5.1% (95%CI[4.3-6.0%]) of respondents sought treatment. Most voice problems were resolved within 1 week (53.0%,95%CI[50.9-55.1%]). Females were more likely than males to report a voice problem (14.4% vs. 10.0%,95%CI[13.7-15.1] and [9.3-10.7], respectively). The 17.6 million Americans with long COVID symptoms were more likely to have voice complaints than those without (21.1% vs. 11.6%,95%CI[18.9-23.5%] and [11.1-12.1%], respectively). Lost workdays were not significantly higher for those with voice disorders compared to those without (17.1 vs. 12.9 days,95%CI[12.0-22.1] and [11.0-14.8], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Voice problems affect approximately 1 in 8 adults in the U.S. annually, demonstrating an alarming increased prevalence since 2012 using the same survey methodology. Relatively few individuals seek care for their voice problem, despite significant self-reported impact. Further study is required regarding the impact of COVID and changes in voice use patterns on voice disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Current Practices in Voice Data Collection and Limitations to Voice AI Research: A National Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Accuracy and validity of voice AI algorithms rely on substantial quality voice data. Although commensurable amounts of voice data are captured daily in voice centers across North America, there is no standardized protocol for acoustic data management, which limits the usability of these datasets for voice artificial intelligence (AI) research. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to capture current practices of voice data collection, storage, analysis, and perceived limitations to collaborative voice research. METHODS: A 30-question online survey was developed with expert guidance from the voicecollab.ai members, an international collaborative of voice AI researchers. The survey was disseminated via REDCap to an estimated 200 practitioners at North American voice centers. Survey questions assessed respondents' current practices in terms of acoustic data collection, storage, and retrieval as well as limitations to collaborative voice research. RESULTS: Seventy-two respondents completed the survey of which 81.7% were laryngologists and 18.3% were speech language pathologists (SLPs). Eighteen percent of respondents reported seeing 40%-60% and 55% reported seeing >60 patients with voice disorders weekly (conservative estimate of over 4000 patients/week). Only 28% of respondents reported utilizing standardized protocols for collection and storage of acoustic data. Although, 87% of respondents conduct voice research, only 38% of respondents report doing so on a multi-institutional level. Perceived limitations to conducting collaborative voice research include lack of standardized methodology for collection (30%) and lack of human resources to prepare and label voice data adequately (55%). CONCLUSION: To conduct large-scale multi-institutional voice research with AI, there is a pertinent need for standardization of acoustic data management, as well as an infrastructure for secure and efficient data sharing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 134:1333-1339, 2024.

Prevalence of Voice Disorders in the United States: A National Survey.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of voice disorders has not been explored in the context of recent trends in voice use, including voice assistant technology and increased use of teleconferencing for remote work. The objective of this research is (1) to determine the prevalence of voice disorders in the adult population of the United States, and (2) to understand the association of voice disorders with demographic and voice use factors, including vocal demands, and use of teleconferencing and voice assistant technology. METHODS: A survey pertaining to voice disorders and voice use was developed and administered to a representative sample of US population. Demographics and information related to risk factors for voice disturbance, including high vocal demands, teleconferencing, and voice-assistant use were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1522 responses were included. Of these, 20.6% reported having had a voice disorder at some point in their life. This rate was higher in employed respondents, singers, and teachers (all p < 0.0001) and was notably higher in those who used teleconferencing technology and voice assistant technology (both p < 0.0001). Approximately 60% of this subset reported seeking medical care for their voice, 12.6% reported a current voice disorder, and 9.5% reported a voice problem that had recurred multiple times. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 Americans surveyed has had a voice disorder. Risk factors for voice disorders include use of teleconferencing technology, voice assistant use, and occupational factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:347-352, 2024.

The Subglottic Stenosis 6 Questionnaire: A Novel Quality-of-Life Survey Validated to Predict Need for Intervention in Patients With Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) is a recurrent, chronic disease defined by fibroinflammatory narrowing of the subglottic airway. A key challenge in treatment is monitoring disease progression, which may be debilitating and unpredictable in its timing. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can the Subglottic Stenosis 6 (SGS-6) questionnaire be validated as a novel quality-of-life (QOL) instrument to monitor breathing, disease progression, and disease severity proactively in patients with iSGS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Panel data from 51 patients with iSGS were collected from January 2012 through June 2022, representing 1,684 patient encounters including routine office visits and treatment encounters. Subjective QOL scores (including the novel SGS-6 and established RAND-36 and EuroQol Five Dimensions [EQ-5D] Visual Analog Scale) and objective pulmonary function test (PFT) results were collected at each visit. Subjective SGS-6 QOL scores were repeated within 1 week of initial reporting. Panel regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between SGS-6 scores, PFT results, and a patient's need for intervention. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for SGS-6 and peak expiratory flow percentage (PEF%) were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and a patient's need for intervention as the external anchor. RESULTS: Each one-point increase in SGS-6 score (of a maximum of 27) was associated with a 3.26% decrease in PEF%, a 1.93-point decrease in RAND-36 Physical Health composite score, a 1.27-point decrease in RAND-36 Mental Health composite score, and a 0.88-point decrease in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale score. The intracorrelation coefficient for the SGS-6 composite score is 0.838 (95% CI, 0.770-0.888). Compared with patient baselines, SGS-6 scores were 4.66 points greater at the time of intervention with an MCID of 2.25 from a patient's baseline. The area under the ROC curve for SGS-6 and a patient's intervention point was 0.81. INTERPRETATION: iSGS disease severity can be modeled using the SGS-6 questionnaire, offering physicians and patients a potentially new method of tracking disease progression and need for intervention remotely.

Trends in Response Rate to US News & World Report Best Hospitals Reputation Survey, 2015 to 2023.

Reputation score has been shown to be the strongest predictor of ranking in the US News & World Reports (USNWR) Best Hospitals report. However, the extent to which physicians participate in the underlying USNWR reputation survey is not well-characterized. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of USNWR public methodology reports from 2015 to 2023 to characterize trends in physician response rates by specialty, region, and Doximity membership. Overall response rates declined between 2015 (24.0%) and 2023 (8.9%). In 2023, rates ranged from 4.7% (psychiatry) to 13.9% (otolaryngology). Otolaryngology had the highest response rate among all specialties between 2017 and 2023. Within otolaryngology, both response rates (25.0% to 13.9%) and count (2106 to 1724 physicians) declined between 2015 and 2023. Among Doximity members, response rates were consistently higher for otolaryngologists in the Northeast and Midwest compared to other regions. Though hospital rankings often influence where patients seek care, our findings suggest USNWR reputation scores may not be reliable or representative.

Complications and Functional Voice Limitations Following Gender-Affirming Laryngeal Surgery (GALS).

OBJECTIVE: Gender-affirming laryngeal surgery (GALS) procedures are effective, with high rates of patient satisfaction following endoscopic vocal fold shortening (glottoplasty) or chondrolaryngoplasty. Despite this, complications and functional limitations in voice use following GALS are not well described. The current study aims to visually characterize the clinical and laryngoscopic features of complications following GALS. METHODS: Patients who presented with complications or subjective dysphonia following glottoplasty or chondrolaryngoplasty across three tertiary care centers were included. Medical charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical history, the primary outcomes of short- and long-term surgical complications, and the secondary outcome of subjective difficulty in daily voice use unrelated to pitch or gender congruence. Postoperative videostroboscopy exams were reviewed for correlating features. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with complications after glottoplasty, chondrolaryngoplasty, or both were identified. Complications after chondrolaryngoplasty occurred in three patients and included skin tethering, late-stage infection with fistula, and voice change. Short-term complications following glottoplasty occurred in four patients and included persistent granulation at the neocommissure (n = 3) and suture dehiscence (n = 1). Persistent dysphonia or voice limitations greater than 6 months following glottoplasty were described by eight patients; associated stroboscopy findings included excessive web formation of greater than 50% (n = 4), incomplete web formation with opening anterior to the neocommissure (n = 2), and scarring of the remaining membranous vocal fold (n = 5). Dysphonia complaints were consistent with observed glottic insufficiency in seven of eight of these patients, with incomplete membranous vocal fold closure posterior to the neocommissure or anterior air escape. CONCLUSION: While chondrolaryngoplasty and glottoplasty have high success rates, complications related to healing, granulation, and web length are not uncommon. Long-term dysphonia appears to be related to postprocedural glottic insufficiency. These data should be used to counsel patients preoperatively about the risks and benefits of GALS.

Ear, Nose, and Throat Manifestations of Vasculitis and Other Systemic Autoimmune Diseases: Otologic, Sinus, and Airway.

Auricular, nasal, and laryngeal manifestations occur frequently in rheumatic diseases. Inflammatory ear, nose, and throat (ENT) processes often result in organ damage and have profound effects on quality of life. Herein, we review the otologic, nasal, and laryngeal involvement of rheumatic diseases, focusing on their clinical presentation and diagnosis. ENT manifestations generally respond to treatment of the systemic disease, which is outside the scope of this review; however, adjunctive topical and surgical treatment approaches, as well as treatment of idiopathic inflammatory ENT manifestations will be reviewed.

Anxiety and Depression Diagnoses and the Cough Severity Index: A Retrospective Study.

Background: As mental health comorbidities can impact patient perception of symptoms, understanding a potential association of anxiety and depression with patients' perception of their cough may provide insight into preferred treatment plans. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with chronic cough was completed. Demographics, anxiety and depression diagnoses, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected. Patient-reported outcomes between the four groups of patients-anxiety only, depression only, anxiety and depression, and none of these conditions-were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests that were used for post-hoc analysis. Results: Cough Severity Index scores were higher in those with both anxiety and depression as compared to neither, with a median score of 26 (range: 5-39) versus 19 (range: 1-38), respectively (P = .041). These results were persistent also after controlling for sex and smoking status in the robust regression analysis. Conclusions: Patients with prior diagnoses of anxiety and depression self-reported more severe symptoms for chronic cough. Adequately understanding the association of mental health with perceived cough severity may help for more individualized, successful treatment plans.

Do You Like Your Voice? A Population-Based Survey of Voice Satisfaction and Voice Enhancement.

OBJECTIVES: Voice enhancement for patients without obvious vocal pathology or loss of function is rarely discussed clinically or in academic research. Our objectives were to: (1) determine voice satisfaction on a population level, and (2) assess willingness to consider interventions to change one's voice. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was created to assess current and past voice disorders. Questions assessed demographics, health status, prevalence of voice disorders, and questions regarding satisfaction with voice. Iterative survey testing and piloting were performed. A cohort with age, gender, and geographic distribution of the general adult population was then queried in an online survey. Qualitative analysis and both descriptive and multivariate statistics were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1522 respondents were included, with an age, gender, and regional distribution reflective of the US population. A minority (38.8%) of respondents reported that they did not like the sound of their own voice in normal conversation; when asked about listening to a recording of their own voice, a majority (57.5%) reported dissatisfaction with voice. Discontent with one's voice was associated with being middle age (p = 0.005), female gender (p < 0.0001), and white race (p < 0.0001). Approximately 50.6% of respondents without a history of dysphonia would consider interventions to change their voice. Of those who indicated they may elect to change their voice, qualities regarding clarity and pitch were paramount. CONCLUSION: Dissatisfaction with one's speaking voice is common. A considerable percentage of the general population without a voice disorder would consider interventions to change their voice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3455-3461, 2023.

Patient and Visit Characteristics Associated With Otolaryngology Telemedicine Care.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians are increasingly adopting telemedicine in an effort to expand patient access and efficiently deliver care. The degree of health disparities among patients receiving otolaryngologic telemedical care is unclear. AIMS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study to explore disparities in telemedicine delivery. METHODS: We evaluated otolaryngology clinical visits from January 2019 to November 2022. We obtained patient demographics and visit characteristics (e.g., subspecialty, telemedicine vs in-person). Our primary outcome was demographic characteristics of otolaryngology patients who received telemedicine vs in-person care during the study timeframe. RESULTS: A total of 231,384 otolaryngology clinical visits were reviewed, of which 26,895 (11.6%) were telemedicine visits. Rhinology (36.5%) and facial plastics (28.4%) subspecialties performed the most telemedicine visits. On multivariate analysis, individuals who identified as Asian, non-English speaking, and with Medicare insurance were statistically significantly less likely to use telemedicine than in-person services. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that expanding telemedicine care may not improve access for all populations, and socioeconomic factors are important considerations to ensure patients are receiving equally accessible care. Futures studies are warranted to understand how these disparities may impact health outcomes and patient satisfaction with care.

Patient Experiences With Thyroid Nodules: A Qualitative Interview Survey.

Objective: To qualitatively explore the broad set of preferences and attitudes patients have about thyroid nodules, which influence the decision-making process. Study Design: A descriptive survey design was administered as interviews. Setting: Outpatient thyroid surgery clinic. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 patients presenting for initial evaluation of thyroid nodules at a surgeon's office. Probative, open-ended questions were posed regarding diagnosis, treatment, risk attitudes, and the decision-making process. Thematic analysis was used to develop code-transcribed interviews, and an iterative refinement resulted in underlying themes. Results: During the diagnostic process, patients integrated emotional responses (fear, anxiety, and shock) with rationale concerns (likelihood of cancer, risk assessment), and ultimately relied heavily on expert opinion and recommendation. Contextualization with other personal or familial health problems served as helpful touchstones for decision-making. Overtreatment and overdiagnosis were not commonly discussed. When thinking about potential therapies, there was a strong bias to action rather than surveillance among patients. Surgical risk and the possibility of lifelong medication, however, were strong motivators for a subset of patients to seek nonsurgical alternatives. Conclusion: Patients describe a decision-making process that incorporates emotional response and rational consideration of risks, contextualized within the personal experience and physician expertise. The bias for action and intervention is strong, and most patients strongly weighted physicians' recommendations. Themes from this qualitative analysis may serve as the backbone for future stated preference research pertaining to thyroid disease.

Voice Disorders Associated With the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been demonstrated to be associated with voice changes. The goal was to determine the strength of the association between ICS use and a diagnosis of dysphonia made by an otolaryngologist and to determine whether inhaler particle type or medication type influenced this risk. STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study from 2018 to 2020. SETTING: Urban academic medical system. METHODS: Adult patients with dysphonia diagnosed by an otolaryngologist, and control patients matched on age, gender, race, and health status, were included. Exposure to ICS was assessed, and the odds ratio (OR) of the association of ICS with dysphonia was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 6551 cases and 6551 matched controls were included. We found that ICS use was significantly associated with dysphonia (OR: 5.11, 95% confidence interval: 4.23-6.17, p < .001). Subset analyses demonstrated no significant differences between inhaler particle types or specific active medications. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of identifying ICS use in the evaluation and treatment of patients with dysphonia.