Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(2): 220-224, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206212

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Microbial contamination of hospital surfaces remains despite adherence to routine disinfection. Our study demonstrates bioburden from various types of hospital high-touch surfaces and the pathogenicity of all bacteria recovered. METHODS: Several high-touch hospital surfaces from a single medical-surgical unit were sampled and cultured using replicate organism detection and counting (RODAC) Tryptic Soy agar plates. Colonies were then subcultured to blood agar plates and speciated using MALDI-TOF. The local microbiology laboratory database was queried for any clinical isolate match with the environmental samples recovered. RESULTS: Manikins, bed rails, and workstations-on-wheels were the most contaminated surfaces with the largest variety of bacteria isolated from manikins and bed rails. A total of 60 different types of pathogens were isolated, 18 of which were well-known pathogens, and 7 were classified as important in the health care setting by CDC. Our clinical microbiology laboratory identified 29 of 60 hospital surface bacteria in clinical isolates. Urine, soft tissue, and blood were the most common sources of clinical isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Surfaces in the health care environment harbor both well-known and not-so-well-known human pathogens. Several not-so-well-known pathogens are skin flora or environmental bacteria, which in the right setting, can become pathogenic and cause diseases including meningitis, brain abscess, endocarditis, and bacteremia.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Microbiota , Humanos , Ágar , Instalações de Saúde , Hospitais , Bactérias , Atenção à Saúde , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 51(12): 1406-1410, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37172646

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The filtered far-UV-C (FFUV) handheld disinfection device is a small portable device that emits far UV-C at 222 nm. The objective of this study was to evaluate the device's ability to kill microbial pathogens on hospital surfaces and compare it to manual disinfection using germicidal sodium hypochlorite wipes. METHODS: A total of 344 observations (4 observations from 86 objects' surfaces) were sampled with 2 paired samples per surface: a pre- and a post-sodium hypochlorite and FFUV sample. The results were analyzed via a Bayesian multilevel negative binomial regression model. RESULTS: The estimated mean colony counts for the sodium hypochlorite control and treatment groups were 20.5 (95% uncertainty interval: 11.7-36.0) and 0.1 (0.0-0.2) colony forming units (CFUs), respectively. The FFUV control and treatment groups had mean colony counts of 22.2 (12.5-40.1) and 4.1 (2.3-7.2) CFUs. The sodium hypochlorite group and the FFUV group had an estimated 99.4% (99.0%-99.7%) and 81.4% (76.2%-85.7%) reduction in colony counts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FFUV handheld device effectively reduced the microbial bioburden on surfaces in the health care setting. The major benefit of FFUV is likely seen when manual disinfection is not possible or when supplementing cleaners or disinfectants with the low-level disinfection properties.


Assuntos
Desinfetantes , Desinfecção , Humanos , Desinfecção/métodos , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia , Teorema de Bayes , Desinfetantes/farmacologia , Hospitais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Raios Ultravioleta
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...