Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(9): 1645-1648, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39279069

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To co mpare the e ffica cy of transcutaneous elec trica l ner ve stimulation with commercially ava ilab le analgesics in alleviating symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Methods: The cross-sectional, interventional study was conducted from March 11, 2020, to August 31, 2023, at the Oral and Maxillofa cial S urger y Department of the Armed Forces Institute o f Den tist r y, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and comprised patients aged 18-65 years who were experiencing pain or distress in the temporomandibular joint region. The par ticipants were divided into intervention group A and control group B. Group A treatment involved applying electrodes near the temporomandibular joint, with parameters adjusted as per the treatment guidelines. Group B subjects received only analgesics along with basic care recommendations. Pain intensit y was assessed using visual analogue scale, while functional impairment and adverse effects were monitored. Data was analysed using SPSS 24. RESULTS: Of the 130 patients initially assessed, 100(77%) were included; 50(50%) in each group. In group A, there were 33(66.0%) fema les and 17(34.0 %) male s wit h overal l mean age 42.8±10.12 years. In group B, there were 30(60%) females and 20(40%) males with overall mean age 46.98±14.09 years. Pain intensity was significantly lower in group A compared to group B post-inter vention (p=0.009). Group A sub jec ts also showed significant post-intervention improvement in terms of mouth opening compared to group B patients (p<0.05). There was no significant intergroup difference with respect to adverse effects (p>0.05). Conclusion: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was significantly more effective than commercially available analgesics in alleviating symptoms of temporomandibular disorders.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Humanos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/terapia , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Medição da Dor , Paquistão , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Manejo da Dor/métodos
2.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56426, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38638765

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE:  This study aims to compare the two mental foramen obturating techniques in parameters like operator's ease, postoperative displacement of obturation material, and remission of pain after peripheral neurectomy in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. STUDY DESIGN:  This study adopts a single-centered comparative analytical approach. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: This study was performed in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry (AFID), from October 1, 2023, to February 10, 2024. METHODOLOGY: Sixty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included and divided into two groups (30 each), and peripheral neurectomy was performed under local anesthesia. In one group, gutta-percha sticks were used to obturate the foramina, and in the other group, titanium screws were used. Postoperatively, the operator's ease, postoperative displacement, and relapse of pain were recorded. RESULTS:  Titanium screws were easy to handle, and there was no relapse of pain because of no displacement postoperatively when compared with gutta-percha sticks, which were hard to manipulate and showed a relapse of pain. CONCLUSIONS:  Titanium screws have better postoperative outcomes when compared with gutta-percha sticks in terms of the operator's ease, relapse of pain, and postoperative displacement.

3.
Eur J Dent ; 17(1): 227-233, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35785825

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Due to the constant battle regarding the controversial topic of orthodontic extraction, this study aims to assess the changes in vertical dimensions of patients treated with premolar extractions compared with nonextraction orthodontic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 60 borderline patients were recruited and divided into extraction and nonextraction groups. Eleven pretreatment cephalometric measurements were recorded using WebCeph and patients were followed-up until the completion of treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Intragroup and intergroup comparisons were made using paired t-test and two-sample independent t-test, respectively. The joint significance of differences was measured using F-tests. RESULTS: The intragroup comparison revealed that in the extraction group, the vertical dimension was significantly increased posttreatment for four cephalometric measurements, that is, mandibular plane angle (p < 0.05), palatal plane angle (p < 0.05), Frankfort mandibular plane angle (p < 0.05), and y-axis (p < 0.05). In the comparison of the posttreatment values of both groups, the mean differences of the posttreatment values for sella nasion (SN)-gonion (Go)-gnathion (Gn) angle (p = 0.008), the total anterior (p = 0.050), and lower anterior facial heights (AFH; p = 0.011) were significantly higher. At the same time, the Jarabak ratio was significantly (p = 0.006) lower in the extraction group than in the nonextraction group. CONCLUSION: The increase in vertical dimension is significantly higher in the extraction group than in the nonextraction group which indicates a significant impact of orthodontic extraction on the vertical dimensions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA