Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction With Porcine Acellular Dermis and Polypropylene Meshes in Subpectoral Implant Placement.

AIM: This research compares postoperative complication rates with Strattice™, SERAGYN® BR, and TiLOOP® Bra interposition devices for subpectoral implant placement after skin or nipple sparing mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 188 breast reconstructions in 157 patients after primary (n=96), secondary (n=71), or prophylactic (n=21) surgery were analyzed regarding major and minor complications. RESULTS: With acellular dermal matrix (ADM) Strattice™, 27.5% major and 27.5% minor complications occurred. Implant loss rates were 27.3% in primary and 30.8% in secondary reconstructions. With SERAGYN® BR, 11.1% major and 13,0% minor complications occurred. Implant losses (6.1%) occurred exclusively in primary reconstructions. With TiLOOP® Bra, 14.9% major and 9.6% minor complications occurred. Implant loss rates were 7.7% in primary and 7.1% in secondary reconstructions. CONCLUSION: ADM was associated with high complication rates in primary and secondary reconstructions. Low complication rates were seen with mesh interposition devices in primary, secondary, and prophylactic reconstructions.

Patient Quality of Life After Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With Synthetic or Biological Materials.

AIM: Quality of life and patient satisfaction after subpectoral breast reconstruction with meshes or acellular dermal matrices (ADM) and implants were assessed using the BreastQ questionnaire to investigate a potential influence of the materials on these parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The BreastQ questionnaire was completed by 121 patients, who had received material-assisted, heterologous, subpectoral breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2018. RESULTS: Answers were similar independent of the reconstruction materials used. After prophylactic mastectomy, the physical wellbeing (chest) improved significantly with all materials (p=0.04). Postoperative radiotherapy significantly reduced satisfaction with outcome (p=0.005). Patients under 50 years old had significantly better postoperative sexual wellbeing than older patients (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: No influence was detected of the materials on the postoperative quality of life and patient satisfaction. An overall better quality of life was reported by younger and normal-weight patients with prophylactic or nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy.

Retrospective Study of Radiotherapy Impact on the Outcome of Material-assisted Implant-based Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Synthetic meshes (SMs) and acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are used in reconstructive breast surgery. In the absence of prospective comparative studies, the identification of differences relies on retrospective analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our analysis focused on the impact of pre- and postoperative radiotherapy (RTX) and material-related differences. The analysis included 281 breast cancer patients (362 breasts) after nipple- and skin-sparing mastectomy with subpectoral implant insertion. RESULTS: Overall, the implant loss rate was 23.1% using porcine ADM, 7% using partially resorbable SM (prSM), and 5.6% using non-resorbable SM (nrSM). After RTX, the implant loss rate was 56.3% with ADM, 13% with prSM and 13.2% with nrSM. The ADM group showed a significant effect of RTX on the postoperative seroma rate, wound infections, and implant loss rate. When prSM was used, RTX showed no significant effect. When using the nrSM, RTX significantly influenced complication rates regarding wound infections and implant loss. CONCLUSION: In material-assisted breast reconstructions with pre- or post-operative RTX, there is a significantly higher implant loss rate when using porcine ADM compared to SM.