Comparison of genome sequencing and clinical genotyping for pharmacogenes.

We compared whole exome sequencing (WES, n = 176 patients) and whole genome sequencing (WGS, n = 68) and clinical genotyping (DMET array-based approach) for interrogating 13 genes with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. We focused on 127 CPIC important variants: 103 single nucleotide variations (SNV), 21 insertion/deletions (Indel), HLA-B alleles, and two CYP2D6 structural variations. WES and WGS provided interrogation of nonoverlapping sets of 115 SNV/Indels with call rate >98%. Among 68 loci interrogated by both WES and DMET, 64 loci (94.1%, confidence interval [CI]: 85.6-98.4%) showed no discrepant genotyping calls. Among 66 loci interrogated by both WGS and DMET, 63 loci (95.5%, CI: 87.2-99.0%) showed no discrepant genotyping calls. In conclusion, even without optimization to interrogate pharmacogenetic variants, WES and WGS displayed potential to provide reliable interrogation of most pharmacogenes and further validation of genome sequencing in a clinical lab setting is warranted.

Genome scan implicates adhesion biological pathways in secondary leukemia.

The genetic risk factors for etoposide-induced leukemia with MLL translocations remain largely unknown. To identify genetic risk factors for and novel characteristics of secondary leukemia, we profiled 116,204 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in germline and paired leukemic cell DNA from 13 secondary leukemia/myelodysplasia cases and germline DNA from 13 matched and 156 unmatched controls, all with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with etoposide. We analyzed global gene expression from a partially overlapping cohort. No single locus was altered in most cases. We discovered 81 regions of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in leukemic blasts and 309 SNPs whose allele frequencies differed in cases vs controls. Candidate genes were prioritized on the basis of genes whose SNPs or expression differentiated cases from controls or showed LOH or copy number change in germline vs paired blast DNA from the 13 cases. Three biological pathways were altered: adhesion, Wnt signaling and regulation of actin. Validation experiments using a genome scan for etoposide-induced leukemogenic MLL chimeric fusions in 15 HapMap cell lines also implicated genes involved in adhesion, a process linked to de novo leukemogenesis. Independent clinical epidemiologic and in vitro genome-wide approaches converged to identify novel pathways that may contribute to therapy-induced leukemia.

Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia identifies uniparental disomy surrounding the NF1 locus in cases associated with neurofibromatosis but not in cases with mutant RAS or PTPN11.

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a malignant hematopoietic disorder whose proliferative component is a result of RAS pathway deregulation caused by somatic mutation in the RAS or PTPN11 oncogenes or in patients with underlying neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), by loss of NF1 gene function. To search for potential collaborating genetic abnormalities, we used oligonucleotide arrays to analyse over 116 000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms across the genome in 16 JMML samples with normal karyotype. Evaluation of the SNP genotypes identified large regions of homozygosity on chromosome 17q, including the NF1 locus, in four of the five samples from patients with JMML and NF-1. The homozygous region was at least 55 million base pairs in each case. The genomic copy number was normal within the homozygous region, indicating uniparental disomy (UPD). In contrast, the array data provided no evidence for 17q UPD in any of the 11 JMML cases without NF-1. We used array-based comparative genomic hybridization to confirm 17q disomy, and microsatellite analysis was performed to verify homozygosity. Mutational analysis demonstrated that the inactivating NF1 lesion was present on both alleles in each case. In summary, our data indicate that a mitotic recombination event in a JMML-initiating cell led to 17q UPD with homozygous loss of normal NF1, provide confirmatory evidence that the NF1 gene is crucial for the increased incidence of JMML in NF-1 patients, and corroborate the concept that RAS pathway deregulation is central to JMML pathogenesis.

Comparative analysis of flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an independent prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The most widely applied MRD assays in ALL are flow cytometric identification of leukemia immunophenotypes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of antigen-receptor genes. We measured MRD by both assays in 227 patients with childhood B-lineage ALL. Of 1375 samples (736 bone marrow and 639 peripheral blood) examined, MRD was <0.01% in 1200, and > or =0.01% in 129 by both assays; MRD levels measured by the two methods correlated well. Of the remaining 46 samples, 28 had MRD > or =0.01% by flow cytometry but <0.01% by PCR. However, PCR (which had a consistent sensitivity of 0.001%) detected leukemic gene rearrangements in 26 of these 28 samples. Conversely, in 18 samples, MRD was > or =0.01% by PCR but <0.01% by flow cytometry. In nine of these samples, flow cytometry had a sensitivity of 0.001%, and detected aberrant immunophenotypes in eight samples. Therefore, the two most widely used methods for MRD detection in ALL yield concordant results in the vast majority of cases, although the estimated levels of MRD may vary in some. The use of the two methods in tandem ensures MRD monitoring in all patients.

Case record review of adverse events: a new approach.

OBJECTIVES: To redesign the existing clinical review form (RF2) used in previous retrospective case record review studies in order to clarify the review process and provide a more powerful analysis of adverse events; and then to ask clinicians to pilot and evaluate the new modular review form (MRF2). The review form is divided into five sections, each with a defined purpose, providing a modular structure. DESIGN: Design and testing of the MRF2 on a sample of medical and nursing records, and evaluation of the reviewers' responses regarding the new review form. SETTING: Hospital based teams from eight countries. RESULTS: The modular review form was reported to be comprehensive, well structured, and clear. Most of the reviewers agreed with the positive statements regarding the review form. Overall, the modular structure was thought to be helpful. Several modifications have been made to the final version to take account of criticisms and suggestions. CONCLUSIONS: The full potential of case record review has yet to be explored. The benefits of this review form include a modular format which enables reviewers or project leaders to select the focus of their review based on resources and the purpose of the review, and to identify contributory factors which indicate areas for improvement and prevention. The training of reviewers is of vital importance for record review. Record review remains one of the primary methods for assessing the incidence of adverse events and the new format is suitable for both prospective and retrospective review.

Exploring the causes of adverse events in NHS hospital practice.

In a previous paper we reported that 10.8% of patients admitted to two large hospitals in Greater London experienced one or more adverse events, of which half were deemed preventable. Here we examine the underlying causes of errors in clinical practice. Rather than identifying specific errors made by individuals, we have looked at possible faults in the organization of care. Adverse events were grouped according to stages in the care process: diagnosis, preoperative assessment and care, operative or invasive procedure (including anaesthesia), ward management, use of drugs and intravenous fluids and discharge from hospital. Less than 20% of preventable adverse events were directly related to surgical operations or invasive procedures and less than 10% to misdiagnoses. 53% of preventable adverse events occurred in general ward care (including initial assessment and the use of drugs and intravenous fluids) and 18% in care at the time of discharge. Probable contributory factors in these errors included dependence on diagnoses made by inexperienced clinicians, poor records, poor communication between professional carers, inadequate input by consultants into day-to-day care, and lack of detailed assessment of patients before discharge.

Quantification of minimal residual disease in T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the TAL-1 deletion using a standardized real-time PCR assay.

Hematologic relapse remains the greatest obstacle to the cure of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Recent studies have shown that patients with increased risk of relapse can be identified by measuring residual leukemic cells, called minimal residual disease (MRD), during clinical remission. Current PCR methods, however, for measuring MRD are cumbersome and time-consuming. To improve and simplify MRD assessment, we developed a real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) assay for detection of leukemic cells that harbor the TAL-1 deletion. We studied serial dilutions of leukemic DNA and found the assay had a sensitivity of detection of one leukemic cell among 100,000 normal cells. We then investigated 23 samples from eight children with ALL in clinical remission. We quantified residual leukemic cells by using the TAL-1 RQ-PCR assay and by using limiting dilution analysis. In 17 samples, both methods detected MRD levels > or =0.001%. The percentages of leukemic cells measured by the two methods correlated well (r2 = 0.926). In the remaining six samples, both methods detected fewer than 0.001% leukemic cells. We conclude the TAL-1 RQ-PCR assay can be used for rapid, sensitive and accurate assessment of MRD in T-lineage ALL with the TAL-1 deletion.

Identification of novel markers for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

To identify new markers of minimal residual disease (MRD) in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), gene expression of leukemic cells obtained from 4 patients with newly diagnosed ALL was compared with that of normal CD19(+)CD10(+) B-cell progenitors obtained from 2 healthy donors. By cDNA array analysis, 334 of 4132 genes studied were expressed 1.5- to 5.8-fold higher in leukemic cells relative to both normal samples; 238 of these genes were also overexpressed in the leukemic cell line RS4;11. Nine genes were selected among the 274 overexpressed in at least 2 leukemic samples, and expression of the encoded proteins was measured by flow cytometry. Two proteins (caldesmon and myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen) were only weakly expressed in leukemic cells despite strong hybridization signals in the array. By contrast, 7 proteins (CD58, creatine kinase B, ninjurin1, Ref1, calpastatin, HDJ-2, and annexin VI) were expressed in B-lineage ALL cells at higher levels than in normal CD19(+)CD10(+) B-cell progenitors (P <.05 in all comparisons). CD58 was chosen for further analysis because of its abundant and prevalent overexpression. An anti-CD58 antibody identified residual leukemic cells (0.01% to 1.13%; median, 0.03%) in 9 of 104 bone marrow samples from children with ALL in clinical remission. MRD estimates by CD58 staining correlated well with those of polymerase chain reaction amplification of immunoglobulin genes. These results indicate that studies of gene expression with cDNA arrays can aid the discovery of leukemia markers. (Blood. 2001;97:2115-2120)

Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the feasibility of detecting adverse events through record review in British hospitals and to make preliminary estimates of the incidence and costs of adverse events. DESIGN: Retrospective review of 1014 medical and nursing records. SETTING: Two acute hospitals in Greater London area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of adverse events. RESULTS: 110 (10.8%) patients experienced an adverse event, with an overall rate of adverse events of 11.7% when multiple adverse events were included. About half of these events were judged preventable with ordinary standards of care. A third of adverse events led to moderate or greater disability or death. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that adverse events are a serious source of harm to patients and a large drain on NHS resources. Some are major events; others are frequent, minor events that go unnoticed in routine clinical care but together have massive economic consequences.

Identification of genes potentially involved in LMO2-induced leukemogenesis.

The most common translocations in childhood T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias involve the LMO2 locus on chromosome 11p13 and cause ectopic expression of the LMO2 gene in thymocytes. Transgenic mice with enforced expression of LMO2 in their thymocytes develop T cell leukemias thus demonstrating the role of LMO2 in leukemogenesis. The physiologic and leukemogenic functions of LMO2 are mediated through its transcriptional regulatory activities, but the identity of the target genes is completely unknown. In this report, we have used cDNA representational difference analysis (cDNA-RDA) to identify genes that are over-expressed and are likely to play a role in the LMO2 induced leukemias. cDNA-RDA was performed using very small amounts of mRNA pool (from 1 microg of total RNA) to reverse transcribe the cDNAs from leukemic cells or normal thymocytes. The cDNA-RDA led to the isolation of nine distinct clones that were specifically overexpressed in the leukemic cells. Sequence analysis revealed that five of the nine clones had identity or homology to known genes that are known to play a role in the pathogenesis of leukemias or other cancers. Three clones had no significant homology to any known genes and thus represent novel candidate genes. Our study demonstrates that cDNA-RDA using very small amounts of total RNA is a highly efficient method to identify novel genes that may play a role in leukemogenesis.

Tandem application of flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction for comprehensive detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with > or = 0.01% leukemic cells in the bone marrow after remission induction are at a greater risk of relapse. The most promising methods of detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) are flow cytometric identification of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of antigen-receptor genes. However, neither assay can be applied to all patients. Moreover, both assays carry the risk of false-negative findings due to clonal evolution. The simultaneous use of both assays might resolve these problems, but the correlation between the methods is unknown. We studied serial dilutions of normal and leukemic cells by flow cytometry and PCR amplification of IgH genes and found the two methods highly sensitive (one leukemic cell among 10(4) or more normal cells), accurate (r2 was 0.999 for flow cytometry and 0.960 for PCR by regression analysis) and concordant (r2 = 0.962). We then examined 62 bone marrow samples collected from children with ALL in clinical remission. In 12 samples, both techniques detected MRD levels > or = 1 in 10(4). The percentages of leukemic cells measured by the two methods correlated well (r2 = 0.978). Of the remaining 50 samples, 48 had MRD levels < 1 in 10(4). In only two samples results were discordant: 2 in 10(4) and 5 in 10(4) leukemic cells by PCR but < 1 in 10(4) by flow cytometry. We conclude that immunologic and molecular techniques can be used in tandem for universal monitoring of MRD in childhood ALL.

The mouse mitotic checkpoint gene bub1b, a novel bub1 family member, is expressed in a cell cycle-dependent manner.

A search for genes differentially expressed in normal and leukemic mouse thymocytes yielded a homolog of the yeast mitotic checkpoint protein Bub1. This novel protein ("mBub1b") has 40% sequence similarity to the mouse Bub1 ("mBub1a") previously described by Taylor and McKeon (1997, Cell 89, 727-735) over four extended domains. Differences between the Bub1 sequences suggest that the two proteins may have different substrate specificities and that Bub1b alone has a putative "destruction" box that can target proteins for degradation by proteosomes during mitosis. Northern blots of normal tissues show that mouse Bub1a and Bub1b genes are expressed in thymus and spleen, but not in nondividing tissues. In synchronized cells, expression of both Bub1 genes is undetectable in G1; Bub1 gene expression peaks in G2/M with Bub1b delayed by 6 h relative to Bub1a. This cell cycle-dependent expression explains the tissue distribution and the abundance of Bub1 mRNAs in rapidly dividing cell lines. The human equivalent of mBub1b was isolated and mapped to chromosome 15q15. The existence in mammals of two separate Bub1 genes encoding distinct proteins, coupled with the different timing of peak expression, suggests that Bub1a and Bub1b have distinct roles in the mitotic checkpoint.