Rules and regulations for a pregnant endourologist: the European perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Working in surgery while pregnant is challenging. Navigating this period safely is of paramount importance. Anecdotal observation suggests that there exists great variation among European nations in regard to maternity leave and radiation safety. The aim of this article was to gain insight into policy patterns and variations across Europe regarding these issues. METHODS: A series of core question items was distributed to representatives across 12 nations Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Republic of Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom). RESULTS: The total number of weeks with full pay ranged from as little as 4 weeks in Belgium to 32 and Iceland. All countries included in this study give the option of additional weeks beyond the initial period, however at reduced pay. Some offer unpaid leave beyond this. Only 5/12 countries had a specific policy on when the pregnant surgeon should come off the on-call rota. Only Austria, Italy and Poland stipulate a requirement for the pregnant clinician to be replaced or be completely exempt in cases involving radiation. Only Germany, Iceland, Norway and Poland highlight the need to limit radiation dose in the first trimester. Beyond this, Germany alone provides written guidance for reduction in gown weight and along with Poland, display arguably the most forward-thinking approach to resting. CONCLUSION: There is a marked range in maternal leave policies across Europe. There also exists a lack of universal guidance on radiation safety for the pregnant urologist. There is urgent need for this void to be addressed.

[Relationship between non-medical reading and burnout as well as professional satisfaction among urologists with migrant background: results of the EUTAKD survey study conducted at German hospitals]. / Zusammenhang zwischen dem Lesen nicht-medizinischer Bücher mit Burnout und beruflicher Zufriedenheit bei Urologen mit Migrationshintergrund ­ Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an deutschen Kliniken.

BACKGROUND: There are no study results on the private and professional satisfaction and the burnout risk of urologists with a migrant background at German hospitals to date. Non-medical reading has been described to have an influence on lower burnout rates among physicians of different specialties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A SurveyMonkey questionnaire with 101 items on criteria characterising the study participant, questions on private and professional satisfaction and the complete Maslach Burnout Inventory was opened to urologists with a migrant background at German clinics between August and October 2020. The impact of non-medical reading on professional satisfaction and burnout was comparatively assessed (group A: ≤1 book/12 months versus group B: ≥2 books/12 months). RESULTS: Eighty-one study participants were included. They were almost equally distributed into groups A (49.4%) and B (50.6%). In several items on personal and professional satisfaction, there was a significantly higher satisfaction in group B. In the burnout dimensions of emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalisation (DP) and personal accomplishment (PA), a high risk of burnout was present in 27.9%, 35.3% and 73.5% of the study participants. A group comparison revealed significant advantages for Group B in the PA dimension in both the sum score (p=0.001) and the categorical comparison (p=0.002). Study participants in Group B also had a significantly lower DP dimension sum score compared with Group A (p=0.047). The group variable was independently associated with a combined score of EE and DP on the one hand (OR 0.316; p=0.031) and the PA dimension on the other (OR 0.170; p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Reading non-medical books was associated with higher professional satisfaction and a lower burnout risk among urologists with a migrant background at German hospitals.

[Surgery during pregnancy - a taboo?] / Operieren in der Schwangerschaft ­ ein Tabu?

When a pregnancy is announced, the normal working day is transformed for the urologists concerned. For fear of legal consequences, pregnant employees are still hardly allowed to operate. However, the new provisions of the Maternity Protection Act do not fundamentally exclude pregnant urologists from working and operating. Why do hospitals nevertheless allow such a deplorable state of affairs, which endangers the daily work routine and makes further training of pregnant urologists more difficult?