First-line evaluation of coronary artery disease with coronary calcium scanning or exercise electrocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Although conventional (CAG) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) are reliable diagnostic modalities for exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), they are costly and with considerable exposure to radiation and contrast media. We compared the accuracy of coronary calcium scanning (CCS) and exercise electrocardiography (X-ECG) as less expensive and non-invasive means to rule out obstructive CAD. METHODS: In a rapid-access chest pain clinic, 791 consecutive patients with stable chest pain were planned to undergo X-ECG and dual-source CTA with CCS. According to the Duke pre-test probability of CAD patients were classified as low (<30%), intermediate (30-70%) or high risk (>70%). Angiographic obstructive CAD (>50% stenosis by CAG or CTA) was found in 210/791 (27%) patients, CAG overruling any CTA results. RESULTS: Obstructive CAD was found in 12/281 (4%) patients with no coronary calcium and in 73/319 (23%) with a normal X-ECG (p<0.001). No coronary calcium was associated with a substantially lower likelihood ratio compared to X-ECG; 0.11, 0.13 and 0.13 vs. 0.93, 0.55 and 0.46 in the low, intermediate and high risk group. In low risk patients a negative calcium score reduced the likelihood of obstructive CAD to less than 5%, removing the need for further diagnostic work-up. CCS could be performed in 754/756 (100%) patients, while X-ECG was diagnostic in 448/756 (59%) patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world patients with stable chest pain CCS is a reliable initial test to rule out obstructive CAD and can be performed in virtually all patients.

Diagnostic performance of exercise bicycle testing and single-photon emission computed tomography: comparison with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

To conduct a comparison of the diagnostic performance of exercise bicycle testing and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable angina. 376 symptomatic patients (254 men, 122 women, mean age 60.4 ± 10.0 years) referred for noninvasive stress testing (exercise bicycle test and/or SPECT) and invasive coronary angiography were included. All patients underwent additional 64-slice CTCA. The diagnostic performance of exercise bicycle testing (ST segment depression), SPECT (reversible perfusion defect) and CTCA (≥50% lumen diameter reduction) was presented as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) to detect or rule out obstructive CAD with quantitative coronary angiography as reference standard. Comparisons of exercise bicycle testing versus CTCA (n = 334), and SPECT versus CTCA (n = 61) were performed. The diagnostic performance of exercise bicycle testing was significantly (P value < 0.001) lower compared to CTCA: sensitivity of 76% (95% CI, 71-82) vs. 100% (95% CI, 97-100); specificity of 47% (95% CI, 36-58) vs. 74% (95% CI, 63-82). We observed a PPV of 70% (95% CI, 65-75) vs. 91% (95% CI, 87-94); and NPV of 30% (95%, 25-35) vs. 99% (95%, 90-100). There was a statistically significant difference in sensitivity (P value < 0.05) between SPECT and CTCA: 89% (95% CI, 75-96) vs. 98% (95% CI, 87-100); but not in specificity (P value > 0.05): 77% (95% CI, 50-92) vs. 82% (95% CI, 56-95). We observed a PPV of 91% (95% CI, 77-97) vs. 93% (95% CI, 81-98); and NPV of 72% (95%, 46-89) vs. 93% (95%, 66-100). SPECT and CTCA yielded higher diagnostic performance compared to traditional exercise bicycle testing for the detection and rule out of obstructive CAD in patients with stable angina.