Screening Tools for Depression and Anxiety in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - A Systematic Review.

The diagnosis of depression or anxiety is often difficult to establish in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) as many physical symptoms are shared. There is no consensus on a screening tool for depression and anxiety in patients with COPD. The aim of this systematic review is to review screening tools for depression and anxiety suitable for application among patients with COPD in the clinical setting. A systematic review was made using predefined search terms and eligibility criteria. Of 274 initially screened articles, seven studies were found eligible. Three depression screening tools (BASDEC, BDI-II and HADS-D) had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity >85%. The best performing anxiety screening tool (GAI) had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 78%. Three screening tools had acceptable psychometric properties according to sensitivity and specificity to detect depression among patients with COPD, but the screening tools for anxiety were of less quality. Further research in and validation of the screening tools is needed to recommend one specific tool.

Are Cancer Patients' Socioeconomic and Cultural Factors Associated with Contact to General Practitioners in the Last Phase of Life?

Introduction. General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in end of life care, which should be offered regardless of socioeconomic position and cultural factors. The aim was to analyse associations between GP contacts at the end of life and socioeconomic and cultural characteristics of Danish cancer patients. Method. Population-based study identifying 599 adults who died of cancer from March to November 2006, in Aarhus County, Denmark. Associations between health register-based data on "total GP face-to-face contacts" and "GP home visits" during the last 90 days of life and patients' socioeconomic and cultural characteristics were calculated. Results. Having low income (RR: 1.18 (95% CI: 1.03; 1.35)) and being immigrants or descendants of immigrants (RR: 1.17 (95% CI: 1.02; 1.35)) were associated with GP face-to-face contacts. However, patients living in large municipalities had lower likelihood of having both GP face-to-face contacts in general (RR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77;0.95)) and GP home visits (RR: 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80; 0.99)). Conclusion. This study indicates higher proportion of GP contacts to economically deprived patients and immigrants/descendants of immigrants. These subgroups were, however, small and results should be looked upon with caution. Furthermore, palliative needs were not included and together with urban/rural the underlying causes need further investigation.