Influence of intestinal microbial metabolites on the abscopal effect after radiation therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background: Most clinical studies failed to elicit a strong antitumor immune response and subsequent systemic tumor regression after radiation therapy (RT), even in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1. Mechanistically, type I interferon (IFN-I) activation is essential for the development of such abscopal effects (AE); however, mechanisms driving or limiting IFN-I activation are ill defined. Groundbreaking discoveries have shown that antibiotics (ABx) can affect oncological outcomes and that microbiota-derived metabolites can modulate systemic antitumor immunity. Recent studies have demonstrated that the bacterial metabolites desaminotyrosine (DAT) and indole-3-carboxaldehyde (ICA) can enhance IFN-I activation in models of inflammatory diseases. Materials and Methods: The subcutaneous bilateral MC38 tumor model is a widely used experimental tool to study the AE in mice. We applied it to explore the influence of broad-spectrum ABx, DAT and ICA on the AE after radioimmunotherapy (RIT). We performed 1x8 Gy of the primary tumor ± anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1, and ± daily oral application of ABx or metabolites. Result: Combinatory ABx had neither a significant effect on tumor growth of the irradiated tumor nor on tumor progression of the abscopal tumor after RIT with anti-CTLA4. Furthermore, DAT and ICA did not significantly impact on the AE after RIT with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1. Surprisingly, ICA even appears to reduce outcomes after RIT with anti-CTLA4. Conclusion: We did not find a significant impact of combinatory ABx on the AE. Experimental application of the IFN-I-inducing metabolites DAT or ICA did not boost the AE after combined RIT. Additional studies are important to further investigate whether the intestinal microbiota or specific microbiota-derived metabolites modulate the AE.

Novel Tumor Organoid-Based Mouse Model to Study Image Guided Radiation Therapy of Rectal Cancer After Noninvasive and Precise Endoscopic Implantation.

PURPOSE: Preoperative (neoadjuvant) radiation therapy (RT) is an essential part of multimodal rectal cancer therapy. Recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which combines simultaneous radiochemotherapy with additional courses of chemotherapy, has emerged as an effective approach. TNT achieves a pathologic complete remission in approximately 30% of resected patients, opening avenues for treatment strategies that avoid radical organ resection. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy can induce clinical complete responses in patients with specific genetic alterations. There is significant potential to enhance outcomes through intensifying, personalizing, and de-escalating treatment approaches. However, the heterogeneous response rates to RT or TNT and strategies to sensitize patients without specific genetic changes to immunotherapy remain poorly understood. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a novel orthotopic mouse model of rectal cancer based on precisely defined endoscopic injections of tumor organoids that reflect tumor heterogeneity. Subsequently, we employed endoscopic- and computed tomography-guided RT and validated rectal tumor growth and response rates to therapy using small-animal magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic follow-up. RESULTS: Rectal tumor formation was successfully induced in all mice after 2 organoid injections. Clinically relevant RT regimens with 5 × 5 Gy significantly delayed clinical signs of tumor progression and significantly improved survival. Consistent with human disease, rectal tumor progression correlated with the development of liver and lung metastases. Notably, long-term survivors after RT showed no evidence of tumor recurrence, as demonstrated by in vivo radiologic tumor staging and histopathologic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel mouse model combines orthotopic tumor growth via noninvasive and precise rectal organoid injection and small-animal RT. This model holds significant promise for investigating the effect of tumor cell-intrinsic aspects, genetic alterations of the host, and exogenous factors (eg, nutrition or microbiota) on RT outcomes. Furthermore, it allows for the exploration of combination therapies involving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or novel targeted therapies.

Experimental investigation of skin toxicity after immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with radiation therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy. However, structured knowledge to mitigate a patient's specific risk of developing adverse events are limited. Nevertheless, there is an exponential growth of clinical studies combining conventional therapies such as radiation therapy (RT) with ICIs. Cutaneous reactions are among the most common adverse events after monotherapy with either ICIs or RT. So far, little is known about interindividual differences for the risk of developing severe tissue toxicity after the combination of RT with ICIs, and the underlying biological mechanisms are ill defined. We used experimental models of RT-induced skin injury to analyze skin toxicity after simultaneous application of ICIs. We compared different RT regimens such as fractionated or stereotactic RT with varying dose intensity. Strikingly, we found that simultaneous application of RT and ICIs did not significantly aggravate acute skin injury in two different mouse strains. Detailed examination of long-term tissue damage of the skin revealed similar signs of epidermal hyperplasia, dermal fibrosis, and adnexal atrophy. In summary, we here present the first experimental study demonstrating the excellent safety profiles of concurrent treatment with RT and ICIs. These findings will help to interpret the development of adverse events of the skin after radioimmunotherapy and guide the design of new clinical trials and clinical decision-making in individual cases. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.