Primary Ewing's sarcoma of the sinonasal tract, eroding the ethmoid and sphenoid sinus with intracranial extension: A rare case report.

Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive tumour that may present with skeletal and extraskeletal forms. The extraskeletal form is rarely encountered in the head and neck region and is extremely rare in the sinonasal tract. This is the case report of a ES of the ethmoid sinus with intracranial and orbital extension in a 33-year-old male patient who presented with anosmia, epistaxis, reduction of visual acuity in the left eye and headache. On otorhinolaryngological clinical examination and biopsy via flexible endoscope, the lesion was misdiagnosed as ethmoid sinus carcinoma. The subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed a large mass (6×7 cm) eroding the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses, extending beyond the orbits and occupying the anterior cranial fossa with a maximum extension of ~5 cm. The patient underwent surgical resection and the microscopic examination of the specimen established the diagnosis of ES (immunohistochemically positive for CD99, neuron-specific enolase, CD56, synaptophysin, pancytokeratin, low-molecular weight cytokeratins and vimentin. The periodic acid Schiff stain exhibited strong intracytoplasmic block positivity and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed a t(22;11) translocation. First-line chemotherapy was administered for 3 cycles; however, on restaging MRI, local disease progression was diagnosed. The patient received radiotherapy and second-line chemotherapy for 6 cycles. At 15 months after the diagnosis, the patient remains recurrence-free and maintains a good functional status and quality of life.

Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients with resectable, locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or cN1-2) adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum were randomly assigned to receive pelvic radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions) and concomitant infused fluorouracil (225 mg/m(2)/d) either alone (arm A, n = 379) or combined with oxaliplatin (60 mg/m(2) weekly × 6; arm B, n = 368). Overall survival is the primary end point. A protocol-planned analysis of response to preoperative treatment is reported here. RESULTS: Grade 3 to 4 adverse events during preoperative treatment were more frequent with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and radiation than with radiation and fluorouracil alone (24% v 8% of treated patients; P < .001). In arm B, 83% of the patients treated with oxaliplatin had five or more weekly administrations. Ninety-one percent, compared with 97% in the control arm, received ≥ 45 Gy (P < .001). Ninety-six percent versus 95% of patients underwent surgery with similar rates of abdominoperineal resections (20% v 18%, arm A v arm B). The rate of pathologic complete responses was 16% in both arms (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.44; P = .904). Twenty-six percent versus 29% of patients had pathologically positive lymph nodes (arm A v arm B; P = .447), 46% versus 44% had tumor infiltration beyond the muscularis propria (P = .701), and 7% versus 4% had positive circumferential resection margins (P = .239). Intra-abdominal metastases were found at surgery in 2.9% versus 0.5% of patients (arm A v arm B; P = .014). CONCLUSION: Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly increases toxicity without affecting primary tumor response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on efficacy end points.

Adjuvant treatment for elderly patients with colon cancer. An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant 5-fluoruracil-based chemotherapy significantly reduces mortality in patients with stage II-III colon cancer, but is less prescribed with rising age. In this study we were interested in the pattern of adjuvant treatment and possible effects on survival among elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to December 2004, 63 questionnaires on the management of stage II-III resected colon cancer patients aged over 70 years, collected from 10 Italian Centres, were retrospectively examined. Determinants of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to survival were considered. RESULTS: The proportion of elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was 79.4%, distinct of age, gender, educational level and comorbidities. Grade 3-4 toxicities were the following: haematological in 4 (8.5.%) patients, mucositis in 4 (8.5%), diarrhoea in 2 (4.2%) and nausea in 1 (2.1%). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at two years were 79.9% and 95.6%, respectively. Due to the paucity of events, the impact of prognostic factors (patient's age and comorbidity, tumour stage and grade) on DFS and OS could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: An increasing proportion of elderly patients with colon cancer may be treated with a tolerability and OS similar to those observed in the younger population. Development of age-based guidelines and increased awareness of both physicians and patients through education is important to prevent undertreatment of those elderly patients who are eligible for chemotherapy.

Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: results of a retrospective analysis addressed to the chiefs of medical oncology units in Italy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the differences of 1-year treatment and chemotherapy related-toxicity in elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in different Italian medical oncology units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open questionnaire on the management of CRC patients over 70 years of age, from January to December 2004, was sent to Italian centres. One hundred and seventy-five files from 10 centres were analysed. Variables considered were age, gender, educational level, comorbidities and modality of therapy administration. RESULTS: In only a minority of units were there some staff specifically dedicated to the older patients in close cooperation with geriatricians and the Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment (MGA) was not routinely used (11.2%-16.8% of cases). Only 5.7% patients were routinely enrolled in a protocol. In total, 95 out of 175 (54.3%) of CRC underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and 80 out of 175 (45.7%) received palliative chemotherapy. Of the patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, 75.6% immediately accepted postoperative treatment while 12.2% were initially dubious but subsequently agreed. Only 5.5 and 9.7% of these patients reported very bad or bad tolerability, respectively. At disease progression, 62.5% patients accepted chemotherapy instantly while 33.3% accepted subsequently. Only 1.3% cases reported very bad and 1.3% bad tolerability. CONCLUSION: In those units in which the problem of the elderly is actually recognised, CRC treatment is adequate, not influenced by age discrimination but inhomogeneous. In the future, standardizing treatment in different oncology units could prove to be beneficial to this population.

Two cases of secondary soft tissue sarcomas after radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The development of secondary soft tissue sarcomas after chemo-radiotherapy is a rare and little known event, but its frequency is increasing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report two cases of secondary soft tissue sarcomas. The first is the case of a 51-year-old woman treated for Hodgkin's disease with chemotherapy and radiotherapy 15 years before she developed a high-grade malignant pleural sarcoma. The patient had no history of asbestos exposure. The second is the case of a 64-year-old woman with a giant cell malignant histiocytoma secondary to colorectal cancer treated with surgery and radiotherapy nine years before. The patients were not eligible for surgery or radiotherapy. Both were treated with chemotherapy (ifosfamide and epirubicin) without any relevant secondary effects; however, the response to therapy was poor. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of secondary malignancies are multifactorial, but radiation therapy and chemotherapy are certainly implicated in the development of post-therapy neoplasms that are difficult to treat.