Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 37(1): e13183, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In secure residential facilities, group climate perceptions of clients with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning are systematically assessed for quality improvement. A valid and reliable measure may ensure that this process is consistent. The Group Climate Inventory-Revised (GCI-R) is a new measure to assess group climate perceptions. METHOD: Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in 148 adult clients (79% male) with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in a secure facility to examine internal structure validity and internal consistency reliability of the GCI-R. RESULTS: The results indicate support for the five-factor structure of the GCI-R ('Support', 'Growth', 'Repression', 'Peer interactions', and 'Physical environment'). The internal consistency reliability of its scales ranged from acceptable to good (α: .72-.87; ω: .76-.86). CONCLUSION: The GCI-R demonstrates evidence of psychometric adequacy when applied to adult clients with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in secure residential facilities.


Assuntos
Deficiência Intelectual , Deficiências da Aprendizagem , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Instituições Residenciais , Processos Grupais
2.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 36(3): 641-652, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36883307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Relationships between dynamic risk factors for externalising problem behaviour and group climate were investigated in 151 adult in-patients with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in a Dutch secure residential facility. METHOD: Regression analysis was used to predict total group climate score and Support, Growth, Repression, and Atmosphere subscales of the 'Group Climate Inventory'. Predictor variables were Coping Skills, Attitude towards current treatment, Hostility, and Criminogenic attitudes subscales of the 'Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales'. RESULTS: Less hostility predicted a better overall group climate, better support and atmosphere, and less repression. A positive attitude towards current treatment predicted better growth. CONCLUSION: Results indicate relationships of hostility and attitude towards current treatment with group climate. A focus on both dynamic risk factors and group climate may provide a basis for improving treatment for this target group.


Assuntos
Deficiência Intelectual , Comportamento Problema , Humanos , Adulto , Deficiência Intelectual/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Etnicidade , Processos Grupais
3.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 63(3): 215-224, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30456768

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Group Climate Instrument (GCI) in a sample of N = 189 adults (79% men) with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning who were residents of a treatment facility in the Netherlands. METHOD: Construct validity of the GCI was examined by means of confirmatory factor analysis. Also, reliability and convergent validity of the GCI were examined. We also examined the variability in perception of the living group climate between and within living groups by computing intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The model contained four first-order factors (support, growth, group atmosphere and repression) and a second-order factor overall climate, providing preliminary support for construct validity of the GCI. Reliability coefficients were good for all factors. Preliminary evidence for convergent validity was found in significant moderate associations between subscales and single item ratings for the factors of group climate. The intraclass correlation coefficients indicated that a considerate proportion of variance can be attributed to between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: The GCI might be used to assess perception of the living group climate for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in psychiatric and forensic care settings, although further development of the GCI and replication of our findings seem necessary.


Assuntos
Processos Grupais , Deficiência Intelectual/psicologia , Deficiência Intelectual/terapia , Psicometria/normas , Tratamento Domiciliar , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Psicológicos , Países Baixos , Psicometria/instrumentação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...