Hepatic arterial therapy with oxaliplatin and systemic capecitabine for patients with liver metastases from breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatic arterial treatment (HAT) for liver metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has only been investigated in few studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two phase II trials were initiated simultaneously to evaluate capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with MBC and liver metastases. These two trials are reported together. Continuous capecitabine (1300 mg/m2) was combined with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) alternating between systemic treatment and HAT followed by degradable starch microspheres with EmboCept® S every second week. Four patients participated in a pharmacokinetic analysis of oxaliplatin. Each patient had samples taken when receiving oxaliplatin systemically and as HAT with and without EmboCept® S. RESULTS: Totally, 52 patients received HAT: 14 with liver metastases only and 38 patients with additional limited metastatic disease. The patients had previously received a median of 2 (range 0-6) chemotherapeutic regimens for MBC. The response rate was 42.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28.7-56.8%) with 7.7% complete and 34.6% partial responses. Median progression free survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 6.9-14.7 months) and median overall survival 27.6 months (95% CI 20.4-34.8 months). The toxicity was moderate with hand-foot syndrome (15.4%), neuropathy (9.6%), fatigue (9.6%), and abdominal pain (9.6%) being the most common grade 3 adverse events. There was no clear difference between systemic blood concentrations of oxaliplatin when given systemic or as HAT. CONCLUSION: HAT oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine is safe and efficient in patients with MBC. The results are promising with high response rates and a long median progression free and overall survival.

Intrahepatic and systemic therapy with oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine in patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate activity and toxicity of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer with liver metastases and limited extrahepatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients received capecitabine 13 00mg/m(2) daily combined with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every two weeks. Seven patients alternated between intrahepatic and systemic oxaliplatin, and in 9 oxaliplatin was primarily given intrahepatic. Five patients had liver-only metastases and 11 had additionally bone metastases. The patients had received median two previous chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic disease. RESULTS: The response rate was 50% and the stable disease (≥6 months) rate 44%. Median progression free and overall survival was 7.9 and 19.2 months, respectively. The toxicity was moderate with abdominal pain, neuropathy, and hand foot syndrome as the most common adverse events. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine and intrahepatic/systemic therapy with oxaliplatin was active in pretreated patients with liver metastasis from breast cancer.

Brain relapses in chemotherapy-treated small cell lung cancer: a retrospective review of two time-dose regimens of therapeutic brain irradiation.

The incidence of brain metastases secondary to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is about 35% and the treatment strategy of brain irradiation with respect to dose and fractionation is controversial. In order to evaluate treatment outcome of brain irradiation in SCLC patients with brain relapse, we retrospectively evaluated all patients treated with brain irradiation in the eastern part of Denmark from 1988 to 1992 (PCI patients excluded). During this 5-year period, 101 evaluable patients were included (44 females, 57 males) (median age 61 years; range, 39-75 years). Forty-four patients, of whom 43 were in extracerebral complete remission (CR), received extended course (EC) brain irradiation (> 45 Gy, treatment schedule > 4 weeks). Fifty-seven patients received short course (SC) brain irradiation (< 30 Gy, treatment schedule < 1 week). Among the SC treated patients, 14 were in CR, 20 had partial remission or stable disease and 23 had progressive extracerebral disease. The median survival (from diagnosis of brain metastases) in the group receiving irradiation with EC (44 patients) was 160 days (range, 74-2021 days), while the 57 patients treated with SC had a median survival of 88 days (range, 20-948 days) (P = 0.00001, Log-Rank analysis). In a subgroup of 14 patients in extracerebral CR, receiving SC irradiation, the median survival was 83 days (range, 15-948 days). When the latter patients were compared to the 43 patients in CR in the group treated with EC, a statistically significant difference was shown (P = 0.034, Log-Rank analysis). Using Cox-hazard regression analysis with backward elimination, liver metastases and poor performance status were adverse prognostic signs, although the only significant parameters of survival were gender (female vs. male, relative risk of dying 1 and 1.52, P = 0.05) and schedule of brain irradiation (extended course vs. short course, relative risk of dying, 0.36 and 1, P < 0.001). Extended course irradiation of brain relapse secondary to SCLC seems in general to be of limited value, although a significant prolonged survival at approximately 7 weeks, was obtained. The prolongation of survival does not seem worthwhile considering the length of treatment time (5-6 weeks) compared to SC treatment (1 week). However, the data do not permit evaluation of the quality of life of the patients. This retrospective evaluation suggests the need for randomized trials with carefully planned quality-of-life assessments.