Randomized trial of radiation therapy (RT) plus dibromodulcitol (DBD) versus RT plus BCNU in high grade astrocytoma.

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized trial to compare survival distributions and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) and DBD with RT and BCNU in patients with high-grade astrocytoma. METHODS: A total of 238 patients with supratentorial grade 3 and grade 4 astrocytoma were studied. Patients were stratified by age, extent of surgery, tumor grade, and performance score and randomly assigned to receive RT 55-60 Gy and either DBD, 200 mg/m2 orally on Days 1-10 every five weeks or BCNU, 200 mg/m2 intravenously every seven weeks. Median age was 60 years; 62% were 55 years or older. Eighty-three percent had subtotal resection, 58% had grade 4 tumors, and 83% had performance scores of 0-2. RESULTS: Survival distributions for all patients in the two arms were similar, with median survival of 41 weeks in each arm. Time to progression distributions were virtually identical, with medians of 22 weeks. BCNU produced significantly greater hematologic toxicity; median leukocyte and platelet nadirs on the first cycle were 3.6 vs. 4.7 (P = 0.0001) and 117 vs. 162 (P < 0.0001), and overall platelet nadirs were 80.5 vs. 114 (P = 0.0019). Non-hematologic toxicities were also significantly greater with BCNU, including nausea (57% vs. 31%; P < 0.0001) and vomiting (45% vs. 17%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This trial found no evidence of differences in treatment efficacy when either DBD or BCNU is combined with radiation therapy for patients with high-grade astrocytoma.

Evaluation of piroxantrone in women with metastatic breast cancer and failure on nonanthracycline chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin generally is considered to be the most effective single chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of breast cancer. The major cumulative dose-limiting toxicity is cardiac toxicity, which may be related to the formation of free radicals with subsequent lipid peroxidation, leading to membrane damage. The anthrapyrazoles, of which piroxantrone is a member, were synthesized in an attempt to eliminate this toxicity. METHODS: A Phase II clinical trial was conducted in 30 women with metastatic breast cancer in whom piroxantrone was administered at a dose of 160 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion. The planned cycle length for retreatment was 3 weeks. Measurable metastatic disease and failure on one prior chemotherapy regimen, but no prior anthracycline exposure, were required for response evaluation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response, and 6 (21% and 95% confidence intervals: 10-43%) achieved an objective response (1 complete, 5 partial responses), with a median response duration of 244 days. The median time-to-disease progression for all patients was 124 days. Eight patients received cumulative doses of piroxantrone approaching or exceeding 1000 mg/m2, and all had reductions in the resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The estimated median decrease in LVEF at 1000 mg/m2 was 16%, with a range of 10-28%. Clinical findings of congestive heart failure developed in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Piroxantrone had definite antitumor activity in women who had metastatic breast cancer and failure on prior chemotherapy that did not include an anthracycline. The 95% confidence interval for response probability was broad, but the level of activity observed was relatively low. The clear association with cardiac toxicity combined with the relatively low efficacy led to the conclusion that piroxantrone cannot be recommended for further development as therapy for women with breast cancer. Further study of other anthrapyrazoles is necessary to determine if the promise of this new class of agents can be fulfilled.

Megestrol acetate for the prevention of hot flashes.

BACKGROUND: Vasomotor hot flashes are a common symptom in women during menopause and in men who have undergone androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Although treatment with estrogens in women and androgens in men can attenuate these symptoms, these hormones may be contraindicated in women with breast cancer and in men with prostate cancer. Pilot trials have suggested that the progestational agent megestrol acetate can ameliorate hot flashes in both groups of patients. METHODS: The patients included 97 women with a history of breast cancer and 66 men with prostate cancer who had undergone androgen-deprivation therapy. All patients had experienced bothersome hot flashes (median number per day at base line, 6.1 for the women and 8.4 for the men). After a one-week pretreatment observation period, the patients received megestrol acetate (20 mg twice daily) for four weeks, followed by placebo for four weeks, or vice versa in a double-blind manner as determined by pretreatment randomization. The patients documented the frequency and severity of hot flashes in daily symptom diaries. RESULTS: After four weeks, hot flashes were reduced by 21 percent in the group receiving placebo first and by 85 percent in the group receiving megestrol acetate first (P < 0.001). An intention-to-treat analysis of data for all eligible treated patients showed that 74 percent of the megestrol acetate group, as compared with 20 percent of the placebo group, had a decrease of 50 percent or more in the frequency of hot flashes during the first four weeks (P < 0.001). The degree of efficacy was similar in men and women. The only side effect was withdrawal menstrual bleeding in women, generally occurring one to two weeks after the megestrol acetate had been discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose megestrol acetate is well tolerated and can substantially decrease the frequency of hot flashes in women and men.

Phase II evaluation of 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin in cisplatin-refractory advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Thirty-nine women with advanced, recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma who failed prior treatment with a platinum-based regimen were treated with leucovorin, 20 mg/m2 intravenously followed by 5-fluorouracil, 425 mg/m2 intravenously, daily for 5 consecutive days every 5 weeks in a phase II trial. Partial regressions were seen in 3 of 15 (20%) measurable disease patients, and objective regressions were seen in 3 of 14 (21%) evaluable/nonmeasurable disease patients. A 50% or greater decrease in CA-125 level was observed in 3 of 10 (30%) patients with no objectively evaluable or measurable disease. Overall objective response rate was 23% (95% confidence interval: 11 to 39%) in all 39 patients evaluated, with a median time to progression of 3 months and overall median survival of 7 months. Toxicities were acceptable and consisted of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, and mild diarrhea. 5-Fluorouracil, as administered in this protocol, had modest antitumor activity in cisplatin-refractory ovarian carcinoma of short duration and minimal toxicity.

Thoracic radiation therapy alone compared with combined chemoradiotherapy for locally unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized, phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival of patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with thoracic radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective phase III trial. SETTING: Multi-institutional cooperative oncology group. PATIENTS: A total of 121 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 7 (5.8%) were ineligible. All patients were ambulatory and had measurable or evaluable disease. Before they were randomized, patients were stratified by ECOG performance score, histologic type, maximum tumor diameter, and NCCTG institution. INTERVENTIONS: Radiotherapy consisted of a total of 5000 cGy in 5 weeks with a 1000 cGy boost in 5 fractions to a small tumor field. Combined modality therapy was MACC which is intravenous methotrexate, intravenous doxorubicin, intravenous cyclophosphamide, and oral lomustine (CCNU), on day 1 and 28. Chemotherapy was followed by identical thoracic radiotherapy 4 weeks after the second cycle of chemotherapy. Four weeks after thoracic radiotherapy was completed, patients received another two cycles of identical chemotherapy. Patients who had progression of disease after chest irradiation only were treated with MACC chemotherapy. MAIN RESULTS: Major clinical responses were observed in 31 of 56 (55%; 95% Cl, 42% to 68%) patients treated with combination therapy and 37 of 58 (64%; Cl, 51% to 76%) treated with radiation only (P greater than 0.2). The median time to progression was 192 days with radiotherapy only compared with 199 days for combined modality therapy (P greater than 0.2). The median survival time was 313 days compared with 317 days, respectively (P greater than 0.2). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates after thoracic radiation only were 45% (Cl, 32% to 58%), 16% (Cl, 6% to 25%), and 7%. With chemoradiotherapy, the survival rates were 46% (Cl, 33% to 60%), 21% (Cl, 11% to 32%), and 5%, respectively. Myelosuppression was significantly greater for the combined modality therapy arm (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy with MACC, in combination with thoracic radiotherapy, did not result in significant survival advantage compared with radiation alone (P greater than 0.2) in patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Statewide breast cancer study. South Dakota Tumor Registrars' Association.

The South Dakota Tumor Registrars' Association reviewed breast cancer cases in South Dakota for the years 1983 and 1988. There were 225 cases in the 1983 group and 266 cases in the 1988 group. Data from this project revealed over 16% of patients in both groups had positive family histories for breast cancer. More cases in 1988 (119) were Stage I as compared to 1983 (69) suggesting earlier detection through increased awareness of the dangers of this disease by improved educational programs from 1983 to 1988, and the increased use of mammography in 1988 (86.8% of patients) as compared to 1983 (48% of patients). Modified radical mastectomy was the initial therapy in the majority of cases in both groups. Segmental resection followed by radiation therapy was the initial local therapy for 13 patients in 1988 as compared to six patients in 1983. Hormone receptor analysis was obtained in over 70% of patients in both groups. Adjuvant drug therapy was given to 25% of patients in both groups. Only two patients in 1983 and one patient in 1988 were entered on national research protocols.

Evaluation of the continuous infusion of etoposide plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer. A collaborative North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic phase II study.

A prospective clinical trial was done to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus etoposide (VP-16) in patients with breast cancer who failed one previous chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease or relapsed within 12 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. Partial responses occurred in 11 of 44 evaluable patients (25%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 13% to 40%). The median time to disease progression in responding patients was 4 months (range, 3 to 6+ months), whereas the median time to disease progression and survival for all patients who were treated were 3 and 7 months, respectively. There was marked toxicity related to this protocol treatment including pancytopenia, gastrointestinal upset, and renal insufficiency. Two treatment-related deaths occurred; one from sepsis and one from renal failure. Thus, this regimen, as second-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer, resulted in moderate, short-term, antitumor activity at the expense of marked toxicity.

Vindesine for metastatic malignant melanoma. A phase II trial.

Sixteen patients, 13 of whom had received prior chemotherapy, were treated with vindesine for advanced malignant melanoma. Previous treatment included vinca alkaloids in six. Thirteen patients received vindesine, 4 mg/m2 and three received vindesine, 3 mg/m2 by weekly I.V. injection. There were two partial (12%) and no complete responses among all of the patients. Both responses occurred in subcutaneous lesions and lasted for 4 and 6 weeks, respectively. Fifteen patients could be evaluated for treatment-related toxicity. The most common side effect was modest leukopenia (less than 3000/microliter) in 10 patients (67%). The lowest leukocyte count recorded was 1100/microliter. Thrombocytopenia was not encountered. Neurotoxicity, manifest most commonly as mild or moderate peripheral paresthesiae, was seen in eight patients (53%).