Rural surgery rotation during surgical residency.

General surgery in the rural hospital is threatened by declining resident interest in pursuing a career in the rural setting. We found that by initiating a rural rotation of 3 months in the senior resident years, a case mix that more approximated that of the rural surgeons was experienced. Also, by experiencing a rural rotation, more residents chose to practice in a rural setting when compared with residents before the initiation of the rotation.

Efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in appendicitis with peritonitis.

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is safe and effective in cases of peritonitis, perforation, and abscess. We investigated our conversion rate and clinical outcomes in this patient population, as well as preoperative factors that predict operative conversion. A retrospective nonrandomized cohort of 92 patients underwent LA for acute appendicitis with peritonitis, perforation, or abscess at our institution between 1997 and 2002. Thirty-six of the 92 were converted to open appendectomy (OA), yielding a conversion rate of 39 per cent. The presence of phlegmon (42%), nonvisualized appendix (44%), technical failures (8%), and bleeding (6%) were reasons for conversion. Preoperative data had no predictive value for conversion. CT scan findings of free fluid, phlegmon, and abscess did not correlate with findings at the time of surgery. Total complication rates were 8.9 per cent in the LA group as compared to 50 per cent in the converted cohort. Postoperative data showed LA patients stayed 3.2 days versus 6.9 days for converted patients (P = 0.01). LA patients had less pneumonia (P = 0.02), intra-abdominal abscess (P = 0.01), ileus (P = 0.01), and readmissions (P = 0.01). LA is safe and effective in patients with appendicitis with peritonitis, perforation, and abscess, resulting in shorter hospital stays and less complication.

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: how effective is preoperative sestamibi scanning?

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) guided by preoperative sestamibi scanning has been shown to reduce operative time, hospital stay, and cost in treating primary hyperparathyroidism. However, controversy exists over routine preoperative sestamibi scanning. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of sestamibi scanning at our institution as part of the MIP protocol and to analyze calcium and parathyroid hormone levels as possible predictors of successful sestamibi scanning. Charts of 37 consecutive patients undergoing MIP at our institution were reviewed, and age, sex, preoperative calcium, and parathyroid (PTH) levels, invasiveness of procedure, and pathologic diagnosis were recorded. Sestamibi scans were reviewed and scored by 4 nuclear medicine faculty based on the level of suspicion for parathyroid adenoma. Neither calcium nor PTH correlated significantly with sestamibi scan score (Spearman coefficient, r = 0.075, P = 0.67 and r = 0.277, P = 0.10, respectively). Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis showed sestamibi scanning to have sensitivity and specificity in predicting MIP completion (87% and 68%). Logistic regression showed only sestamibi scan (P = 0.038), not calcium or PTH (P = 0.977 and P = 0.767) to be predictive of MIP completion. In conclusion, sestamibi scanning effectively predicted the ability to perform MIP. However, preoperative calcium and PTH predicted neither sestamibi scan results nor completion of MIP.