RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. It's the second leading cause cancer men in death. Prognostic tests based on molecular and biomarker analysis of tumor tissue may improve risk stratification of prostate cancer 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a search on Pubmed for PC biomarkers, 72 papers responded to the objectives and will be included in the review. RESULTS: A plethora of biomarkers are predictive for the prognosis of PC and its response to certain therapies, while others, once thought to be indicative of prognosis in PC, were not. CONCLUSIONS: This study can help in the development of diagnostic and prognostic tests of PC and contribute to the ongoing research into already existing tests.
Assuntos
Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnósticoAssuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Humanos , Imunoterapia/tendências , Terapia Neoadjuvante/tendênciasRESUMO
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer care in the Middle East is highly variable and access to specialist multidisciplinary management is limited. Academic tertiary referral centers offer cutting-edge diagnosis and treatment; however, in many parts of the region, patients are managed by non-specialists with limited resources. Due to many factors including lack of awareness and lack of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, a high percentage of men present with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis. The aim of these recommendations is to assist clinicians in managing patients with different levels of access to diagnostic and treatment modalities. METHODS: The first Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) satellite meeting for the Middle East was held in Beirut, Lebanon, November 2017. During this meeting a consortium of urologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologist and imaging specialists practicing in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia voted on a selection of consensus questions. An additional workshop to formulate resource-stratified consensus recommendations was held in March 2019. RESULTS: Variations in practice based on available resources have been proposed to form resource-stratified recommendations for imaging at diagnosis, initial management of localized prostate cancer requiring therapy, treatment of castration-sensitive/naïve advanced prostate cancer and treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: This is the first regional consensus on prostate cancer management from the Middle East. The following recommendations will be useful to urologists and oncologists practicing in all areas with limited access to specialist multi-disciplinary teams, diagnostic modalities and treatment resources.
