[Whole-body MR angiography: comparison of two protocols for contrast media injection]. / Ganzkörper-MR-Angiographie: Vergleich von zwei Protokollen zur Kontrastmittelinjektion.

PURPOSE: To compare two injection strategies for contrast media injection in whole-body MR angiography quantitatively and qualitatively with regard to contrast and image quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 40 patients were examined at 1.5 Tesla using either a single injection protocol or a double injection protocol with two separate bolus injections. Vessel regions I (supraaortic/thoracic), II (abdominal/pelvic), III (upper legs) and IV (lower legs) were examined in the following order: single injection: I, II, III, IV, double injection: I and IV after the first injection, II and III after the second bolus injection. Quantitative evaluation: SI measurements were carried out in 2 arteries per region. Contrast values were calculated. Qualitative evaluation: Evaluation of regions I-IV regarding vessel contrast, venous overlay and image quality on a five-point scale by two reviewers in consensus. The Mann-Whitney-U test was used to test the differences for significance. RESULTS: Quantitative evaluation: Using the double injection protocol, significantly higher contrast values in regions I and II and significantly lower contrast values in the subregions IIIa (upper part of III) and IVb (lower part of IV) were obtained (p < 0.05). The mean contrast values in subregions IIIb (lower part of III) and IVa (upper part of IV) were lower using the double injection protocol, but not significantly. Qualitative evaluation: Using the double injection protocol, region II was rated significantly higher (mean ratings: 3.55, 3.45 and 3.5 versus 2.7, 2.5 and 2.55; p < 0.05) and region III significantly lower (mean ratings: 3.1, 2, 2.5 versus 3.9, 3.1 and 3.55; p < 0.05) for all three examined criteria. When using the double injection protocol, ratings were significantly lower in region IV regarding vessel contrast and image quality (mean ratings: 2.4 and 2.15 versus 3.45 and 3.15; p < 0.05). The ratings regarding venous overlay in region IV showed no significant differences (mean ratings: 2.15 versus 2.75; p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Due to the better results in the supraaortic/thoracic and abdominal/pelvic regions, the double injection protocol is preferred. However, both protocols require further improvement.

Molecular diagnosis of the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelogenous and acute lymphoblastic leukemias by PCR.

We have developed a very rapid method for the detection of the Philadelphia chromosome based on the polymerase chain reaction. This chromosomal translocation generates bcr/abl fusion mRNAs, which were transcribed in cDNAs and subsequently amplified with two sets of primers. Through the use of an additional internal primer set the method reaches the sensitivity to detect a single Ph1-positive cell among 10(5) unaffected cells without any blotting procedures. The whole analytical procedure starting from RNA isolation up to agarose gel electrophoresis can be performed in about 5 h. First results indicate that the frequency of the Ph1 translocation exceeds 40 per cent in certain immunologic subtypes of adult acute leukemia.