Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor in conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the tyrosine kinase epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. METHODS: A retrospective, observational case series of 5 patients with biopsy-proven conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma treated at one institution between January 1996 and April 2004. Medical records and tissue specimens from the 5 patients were reviewed. A control specimen of normal conjunctiva was also obtained from one of the 5 patients. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies against EGFR. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical staining showed that EGFR expression was moderate to strong in all tissue specimens, both in the normal mucosa and in the in situ and invasive components of the conjunctival squamous cell carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: An intense expression of EGFR occurs in squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Further study is needed to determine whether an EGFR inhibitor that targets this expression would have potential therapeutic benefit in treating squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva.

The smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene enucleation implant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To describe early clinical results with the porous polyethylene smooth surface tunnel (SST) enucleation implant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Uncontrolled, prospective interventional case series of patients undergoing enucleation with placement of the SST implant. This implant consists of a porous polyethylene sphere with a smooth anterior surface containing pre-drilled tunnels to facilitate direct suturing of the rectus muscles to the implant without use of an implant wrap. Postoperatively, socket healing was assessed, and prosthesis and socket motility were evaluated by the surgeon using an ordinal scale (0 = no motility to 4 = excellent motility). RESULTS: Thirty patients received the SST implant, with a mean follow-up of more than 23 months. Two cases of exposure occurred and were managed surgically without the need for explantation. Mean socket motility was 3.1 on a 0 to 4 ordinal scale, with mean prosthesis motility of 2.8. CONCLUSION: The SST implant provides satisfactory socket motility and is generally well tolerated in the anophthalmic socket without the need for wrapping material.

Use of bioglass for orbital volume augmentation in enophthalmos: a rabbit model (oryctolagus cuniculus).

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical and histologic response of Novabone-C/M as an osteoproductive alloplastic implant for volume augmentation in the orbit in the treatment of enophthalmos and to compare its outcome alone versus its use in combination with autogenous bone or Medpor granules. METHODS: Novabone-C/M, a bioactive silicone glass material, was implanted in the subperiosteal space of the left orbit of 12 New Zealand White rabbits. The animals were divided into 3 groups, each with 4 animals, based on the material implanted in the orbit: group 1, Novabone alone; group 2, Novabone plus Medpor granules; and group 3, Novabone plus autogenous bone fragments. All rabbits were studied clinically, radiographically, and histologically at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals. Animals underwent preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional reconstruction, proptosis measurements, and volumetric analysis. Orbit specimens were studied histologically with mineralized bone stain (MIBS) to look for bone formation, reactivity, infection, implant resorption, and migration. RESULTS: There were no signs of significant inflammation or infection. Subcutaneous migration of the implant was seen radiographically but not clinically in groups 1 and 3. Induced proptosis averaged 2.5 mm (at 1 month) and showed regression in all groups over a 6-month period but was not statistically significant. Implant volume was markedly reduced in all groups, averaging 69% in group 1, 37% in group 2, and 59% in group 3 at 6 months. New bone formation and bone remodeling was present in all 3 groups at 3 months and only in group 2 at 6 months. The rate and amount of implant remodeling and bone formation was greatest in the Novabone/Medpor group (group 2). CONCLUSIONS: Bioglass particulate is biocompatible, easy to use in the orbit, and stimulates bone growth. Bioglass is associated with volume loss and migration over 6 months and may not provide adequate volume augmentation in the orbit when used alone for the treatment of enophthalmos. The duration and amount of bone formation may be enhanced when Novabone is used in conjunction with Medpor.

The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate complications and risk factors associated with the placement of wrapped and unwrapped porous polyethylene (PP) spherical implants after evisceration, enucleation, or secondary implantation. METHODS: A retrospective, interventional, noncomparative case series of consecutive cases of PP implant placement after anophthalmic socket surgery performed by three surgeons over a 5-year period. A PP spherical implant was placed in 133 patients, 61 women (2 bilaterally) and 72 men (1 bilaterally). There were 91 enucleations, 30 eviscerations, and 15 secondary implant placements. Sixty-six (48.5%) implants were wrapped prior to placement. Parameters evaluated included: age, sex, prior ocular surgery or radiation treatment, indications for surgery, procedure performed, size of PP sphere, material used to wrap the implant, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 17 of 136 (12.5%) cases had documented postoperative complications, with implant exposure being the most common. In 5 patients (3.7%), implant exposure developed: 1 after evisceration and 4 after primary enucleation. Three of the five exposures were small and resolved with either observation alone or in one case with surgical revision of the socket. In two cases, the exposures were large enough that removal of the implant was indicated, one after evisceration and the other after enucleation with placement of a wrapped PP sphere. CONCLUSIONS: Our series revealed no significant difference in exposure rate between wrapped and unwrapped PP sphere implants, nor was the exposure rate affected by whether an eye was eviscerated or enucleated.