Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
3.
Anaesthesia ; 75(11): 1437-1447, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32516833

RESUMO

Healthcare workers involved in aerosol-generating procedures, such as tracheal intubation, may be at elevated risk of acquiring COVID-19. However, the magnitude of this risk is unknown. We conducted a prospective international multicentre cohort study recruiting healthcare workers participating in tracheal intubation of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Information on tracheal intubation episodes, personal protective equipment use and subsequent provider health status was collected via self-reporting. The primary endpoint was the incidence of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis or new symptoms requiring self-isolation or hospitalisation after a tracheal intubation episode. Cox regression analysis examined associations between the primary endpoint and healthcare worker characteristics, procedure-related factors and personal protective equipment use. Between 23 March and 2 June 2020, 1718 healthcare workers from 503 hospitals in 17 countries reported 5148 tracheal intubation episodes. The overall incidence of the primary endpoint was 10.7% over a median (IQR [range]) follow-up of 32 (18-48 [0-116]) days. The cumulative incidence within 7, 14 and 21 days of the first tracheal intubation episode was 3.6%, 6.1% and 8.5%, respectively. The risk of the primary endpoint varied by country and was higher in women, but was not associated with other factors. Around 1 in 10 healthcare workers involved in tracheal intubation of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 subsequently reported a COVID-19 outcome. This has human resource implications for institutional capacity to deliver essential healthcare services, and wider societal implications for COVID-19 transmission.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Pessoal de Saúde , Intubação Intratraqueal , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Adulto , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Br J Anaesth ; 123(5): 664-670, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31493848

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient-centred outcomes are increasingly used in perioperative clinical trials. The Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative aims to define which measures should be used in future research to facilitate comparison between studies and to enable robust evidence synthesis. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to create a longlist of patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, functional status, patient well-being, and life-impact measures for consideration. A three-stage Delphi consensus process involving 89 international experts was then conducted in order to refine this list into a set of recommendations. RESULTS: The literature review yielded six patient-satisfaction measures, seven generic health-related quality-of-life measures, eight patient well-being measures, five functional-status measures, and five life-impact measures for consideration. The Delphi response rates were 92%, 87%, and 100% for Rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three additional measures were added during the Delphi process as a result of contributions from the StEP group members. Firm recommendations have been made about one health-related quality-of-life measure (EuroQol 5 Dimension, five-level version with visual analogue scale), one functional-status measure (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule version 2.0, 12-question version), and one life-impact measure (days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery). Recommendations with caveats have been made about the Bauer patient-satisfaction measure and two life-impact measures (days alive and out of hospital at 1 yr after surgery, and discharge destination). CONCLUSIONS: Several patient-centred outcome measures have been recommended for use in future perioperative studies. We suggest that every clinical study should consider using at least one patient-centred outcome within a suite of endpoints.


Assuntos
Determinação de Ponto Final/normas , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Atividades Cotidianas , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Psicometria , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/reabilitação
5.
Br J Anaesth ; 120(1): 109-116, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29397117

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with osteoarthritis and the need for joint surgery. Obese patients who undergo joint surgery may have a higher risk of morbidity compared with normal or overweight patients but less is known about their risk of postoperative disability. The primary objective of our study was to determine the association between obesity and the development of new dependence in activities of daily living within 2 years after joint surgery. METHODS: We obtained data from the Health and Retirement Study, a longitudinal survey of older Americans. We included participants who indicated having joint surgery for arthritis. We defined obesity as a BMI ≥30 kg m-2. Our outcome was a new or increased dependence in one or more activities of daily living after surgery. RESULTS: We analysed data on 2519 respondents who underwent joint surgery for arthritis. Respondents had a median age of 69yr, 65.5% were female, 66.6% had joint replacement surgery and 45.3% were obese. The overall incidence of a new dependence within 2years was 22.1%. Obese respondents had a higher incidence of new dependence compared with non-obese respondents (25.4% vs 19.4%, P<0.001). In adjusted analysis, obese respondents had increased odds of developing dependence [odds ratio 1.35 (95% CI 1.09-1.68), P=0.007]. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing dependence in the 2 years after joint surgery. Our study findings identify a high-risk group that may benefit from targeted interventions and allocation of perioperative resources to optimize recovery and minimize longer-term disability.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Nível de Saúde , Articulações/cirurgia , Obesidade/complicações , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Aposentadoria/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Artrite/cirurgia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Br J Anaesth ; 115 Suppl 2: ii15-25, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26658197

RESUMO

As the population of the world is rapidly ageing, the amount of surgery being performed in older patients is also increasing. Special attention is required for the anaesthetic and perioperative management of these patients. The clinical and non-clinical issues specific to older surgical patients are reviewed, with a special emphasis on areas of debate related to anaesthesia care in this group. These issues include the role of frailty and disability in preoperative assessment, choice of anaesthesia technique for hip fracture, postoperative delirium, and approaches to shared decision-making before surgical procedures.


Assuntos
Anestesia/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Delírio/etiologia , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Participação do Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco/métodos
9.
Tob Control ; 14(5): 328-37, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16183984

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third edition (DSM-III), published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1980, included the first official definitions by the APA of tobacco dependence and tobacco withdrawal. Tobacco industry efforts to influence the DSM-III were investigated. METHOD: Searches of previously secret tobacco industry documents, primarily the University of California San Francisco Legacy Tobacco Documents Library and British American Tobacco collections. Additional information was collected through discussions with editors of DSM-III, and library and general internet searches. RESULTS: The tobacco companies regarded the inclusion of tobacco dependence as a diagnosis in DSM-III as an adverse event. It worked to influence the content of the DSM-III and its impact following publication. These efforts included public statements and private lobbying of DSM-III editors and high ranking APA officers by prominent US psychiatrists with undisclosed ties to the tobacco industry. Following publication of DSM-III, tobacco companies contracted with two US professors of psychiatry to organise a conference and publish a monograph detailing controversies surrounding DSM-III. CONCLUSIONS: The tobacco industry and its allies lobbied to narrow the definition of tobacco dependence in serial revisions of DSM-III. Following publication of DSM-III, the industry took steps to try to mitigate its impact. These actions mirror industry tactics to influence medical research and policy in various contexts worldwide. Such tactics slow the spread of a professional and public understanding of smoking and health that otherwise would reduce smoking, smoking induced disease, and tobacco company profits.


Assuntos
Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Manobras Políticas , Indústria do Tabaco , Tabagismo/diagnóstico , Conflito de Interesses , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Tabagismo/classificação , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...