"Hit-and-run" transformation by adenovirus oncogenes.

According to classical concepts of viral oncogenesis, the persistence of virus-specific oncogenes is required to maintain the transformed cellular phenotype. In contrast, the "hit-and-run" hypothesis claims that viruses can mediate cellular transformation through an initial "hit," while maintenance of the transformed state is compatible with the loss ("run") of viral molecules. It is well established that the adenovirus E1A and E1B gene products can cooperatively transform primary human and rodent cells to a tumorigenic phenotype and that these cells permanently express the viral oncogenes. Additionally, recent studies have shown that the adenovirus E4 region encodes two novel oncoproteins, the products of E4orf6 and E4orf3, which cooperate with the viral E1A proteins to transform primary rat cells in an E1B-like fashion. Unexpectedly, however, cells transformed by E1A and either E4orf6 or E4orf3 fail to express the viral E4 gene products, and only a subset contain E1A proteins. In fact, the majority of these cells lack E4- and E1A-specific DNA sequences, indicating that transformation occurred through a hit-and-run mechanism. We provide evidence that the unusual transforming activities of the adenoviral oncoproteins may be due to their mutagenic potential. Our results strongly support the possibility that even tumors that lack any detectable virus-specific molecules can be of viral origin, which could have a significant impact on the use of adenoviral vectors for gene therapy.

Two distinct activities contribute to the oncogenic potential of the adenovirus type 5 E4orf6 protein.

Previous studies have shown that the adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) E4orf6 gene product displays features of a viral oncoprotein. It initiates focal transformation of primary rat cells in cooperation with Ad5 E1 genes and confers multiple additional transformed properties on E1-expressing cells, including profound morphological alterations and dramatically accelerated tumor growth in nude mice. It has been reported that E4orf6 binds to p53 and, in the presence of the Ad5 E1B-55kDa protein, antagonizes p53 stability by targeting the tumor suppressor protein for active degradation. In the present study, we performed a comprehensive mutant analysis to assign transforming functions of E4orf6 to distinct regions within the viral polypeptide and to analyze a possible correlation between E4orf6-dependent p53 degradation and oncogenesis. Our results show that p53 destabilization maps to multiple regions within both amino- and carboxy-terminal parts of the viral protein and widely cosegregates with E4orf6-dependent acceleration of tumor growth, indicating that both effects are related. In contrast, promotion of focus formation and morphological transformation require only a carboxy-terminal segment of the E4 protein. Thus, these effects are completely independent of p53 stability, but may involve other interactions with the tumor suppressor. Our results demonstrate that at least two distinct activities contribute to the oncogenic potential of Ad5 E4orf6. Although genetically separable, both activities are largely mediated through a novel highly conserved, cysteine-rich motif and a recently described arginine-faced amphipathic alpha helix, which resides within a carboxy-terminal "oncodomain" of the viral protein.

An ovine adenovirus vector lacks transforming ability in cells that are transformed by AD5 E1A/B sequences.

Adenoviruses of the Mastadenovirus and Aviadenovirus genera are able to transform certain cell types and induce tumor formation in susceptible animals. For the mastadenoviruses the E1A/B sequences are largely responsible for these properties but E4 sequences may also be involved. The transforming sequences of the aviadenoviruses, which lack E1A/B and E4 homologues, have not yet been fully identified. The recent proposal for a third genus of adenoviruses, which apparently lack an E1A homologue and have weak E1B homology, prompted an examination of the transforming properties of ovine adenovirus OAV287 (OAV), the prototype member of the new group. When OAV and human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) were used to infect primary rat embryo cells, transformed foci developed in Ad5- but not in OAV-infected cultures. Similarly, after plasmid transfection, baby rat kidney cells were transformed by Ad5 E1A/B but not by OAV sequences. When CSL503 cells, an ovine cell line that is permissive for OAV, were transfected with Ad5 E1A/B sequences, transformed foci again appeared. However, plasmids or fragments containing complete or partial OAV genome sequences did not detectably transform CSL503 cells under the same conditions. When Ad5 E1A/B sequences were incorporated into the complete OAV genome and transfected, transformed clones were again obtained, showing that the gene dosage and transfection conditions were not limiting for transformation. The provision of Ad5 E1A and OAV sequences in combination marginally increased the number of morphologically altered foci in baby rat kidney cells but failed to induce multilayered focus formation. The data suggest that OAV lacks transforming functions in the cell types examined. Additional information suggesting that OAV may have a fundamentally distinct strategy for replication compared with other Ads is discussed.

The adenovirus E4orf6 protein contributes to malignant transformation by antagonizing E1A-induced accumulation of the tumor suppressor protein p53.

The adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) E4orf6 protein promotes focus formation of primary baby rat kidney (BRK) cells in cooperation with Ad5 E1 proteins. This activity is most likely related to the ability of the E4orf6 protein to bind to p53 and modulate its tumor suppressor functions. In this study we report that transformed BRK cells that stably express E4orf6 in addition to E1A and E1B (ABS cells) displayed multiple additional properties commonly associated with a high grade of oncogenic transformation compared to cells expressing only E1A and E1B (AB cells). These properties included morphological alterations, markedly enhanced growth rates and growth to much higher saturation densities. Following injection into nude mice ABS-derived tumors exhibited accelerated growth and, based on histopathological criteria, proofed to be much more malignant compared to tumors generated by AB cells. Interestingly, these highly transformed properties of ABS cells correlated with a dramatic reduction of p53 steady-state levels which inversely correlated with E4orf6 expression. From these results we conclude that expression of the Ad5 E4orf6 protein (i) confers additional transformed in vitro properties to primary rat cells expressing the Ad5 E1 proteins, and (ii) increases the tumorigenic and malignant potential of these cells in vivo. Our data suggest that the Ad5 E4orf6 protein enhances the intrinsic ability of E1-transformed rat cells to grow in a neoplastic state by completely inactivating p53 tumor suppressor function in combination with the E1A and E1B proteins.

Transforming potential of the adenovirus type 5 E4orf3 protein.

Previous observations that the adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) E4orf6 and E4orf3 gene products have redundant effects in viral lytic infection together with the recent findings that E4orf6 possesses transforming potential prompted us to investigate the effect of E4orf3 expression on the transformation of primary rat cells in combination with adenovirus E1 oncogene products. Our results demonstrate for the first time that E4orf3 can cooperate with adenovirus E1A and E1A plus E1B proteins to transform primary baby rat kidney cells, acting synergistically with E4orf6 in the presence of E1B gene products. Transformed rat cells expressing E4orf3 exhibit morphological alterations, higher growth rates and saturation densities, and increased tumorigenicity compared with transformants expressing E1 proteins only. Consistent with previous results for adenovirus-infected cells, the E4orf3 protein is immunologically restricted to discrete nuclear structures known as PML oncogenic domains (PODs) in transformed rat cells. As opposed to E4orf6, the ability of E4orf3 to promote oncogenic cell growth is probably not linked to a modulation of p53 functions and stability. Instead, our results indicate that the transforming activities of E4orf3 are due to combinatorial effects that involve the binding to the adenovirus 55-kDa E1B protein and the colocalization with PODs independent from interactions with the PML gene product. These data fit well with a model in which the reorganization of PODs may trigger a cascade of processes that cause uncontrolled cell proliferation and neoplastic growth. In sum, our results provide strong evidence for the idea that interactions with PODs by viral proteins are linked to oncogenic transformation.

The adenovirus E4orf6 protein can promote E1A/E1B-induced focus formation by interfering with p53 tumor suppressor function.

We have recently shown that the adenovirus type 5 E4orf6 protein interacts with the cellular tumor suppressor protein p53 and blocks p53 transcriptional functions. Here we report that the E4orf6 protein can promote focus formation of primary rodent epithelial cells in cooperation with adenovirus E1A and E1A plus E1B proteins. The E4orf6 protein can also inhibit p53-mediated suppression of E1A plus E1B-19kDa-induced focus formation. Mutant analysis of the E4orf6 protein demonstrates that these activities correlate with the ability of the adenovirus protein to relieve transcriptional repression mediated by the carboxyl-terminal region of p53 in transient transfection assays. We further demonstrate that expression of wild-type E4orf6 correlates with a dramatic reduction of p53 steady-state levels in transformed rat cells. Our data demonstrate that adenovirus type 5 encodes two different proteins, E1B-55kDa and E4orf6, that bind to p53 and contribute to transformation by modulating p53 transcriptional functions.

Structural analysis of the adenovirus type 5 E1B 55-kilodalton-E4orf6 protein complex.

The adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) early 1B (E1B) 55-kDa (E1B-55kDa)-E4orf6 protein complex has been implicated in the selective modulation of nucleocytoplasmic mRNA transport at late times after infection. Using a combined immunoprecipitation-immunoblotting assay, we mapped the domains in E1B-55kDa required for the interaction with the E4orf6 protein in lytically infected A549 cells. Several domains in the 496-residue 55-kDa polypeptide contributed to a stable association with the E4orf6 protein in E1B mutant virus-infected cells. Linker insertion mutations at amino acids 180 and 224 caused reduced binding of the E4orf6 protein, whereas linker insertion mutations at amino acid 143 and in the central domain of E1B-55kDa eliminated the binding of the E4orf6 protein. Earlier work showing that the central domain of E1B-55kDa is required for binding to p53 and the recent observation that the E4orf6 protein also interacts with the tumor suppressor protein led us to suspect that p53 might play a role in the E1B-E4 protein interaction. However, coimmunoprecipitation assays with extracts prepared from infected p53-negative H1299 cells established that p53 is not needed for the E1B-E4 protein interaction in adenovirus-infected cells. Using two different protein-protein interaction assays, we also mapped the region in the E4orf6 protein required for E1B-55kDa interaction to the amino-terminal 55 amino acid residues. Interestingly, both binding assays established that the same region in the E4orf6/7 protein can potentially interact with E1B-55kDa. Our results demonstrate that two distinct segments in the 55-kDa protein encoding the transformation and late lytic functions independently interact with p53 and the E4orf6 protein in vivo and provide further insight by which the multifunctional 55-kDa EIB protein can exert its multiple activities in lytically infected cells and in adenovirus transformation.