The Isosceles Nasal Tip-Laser-Assisted Midline Assessment in Rhinoplasty.

The accurate determination of the nasal tip's spatial location is crucial for achieving symmetry in rhinoplasty. Even minor deviations can result in asymmetrical lengths and configurations of the nostrils. Our approach centers on defining the nasal tip position by establishing the midline of the nasal base and projecting an isosceles triangle. This triangle, with the tip as the vertex and alar creases as angles, ensures symmetric sidewalls. The symmetry axis, derived from the isosceles triangle, guides the placement of the tip sidewalls and columella. To implement this, we use anatomical benchmarks such as the implantation of the nasal base and position of the alar creases, considering inherent facial asymmetries. We introduce a laser gadget as an auxiliary tool, projecting perpendicular lines to guide precise midline alignment. Marking specific points, including interbrow midpoint and alar creases, ensures accuracy. In the past 12 months, we applied this methodology in 247 rhinoplasty cases, observing improved outcomes and patient satisfaction. Our proposal of utilizing isosceles triangles provides a streamlined approach to achieving symmetry. The laser device, while beneficial, should be viewed as supportive rather than an absolute guiding measure.

Eyebrow Lift: Open-Book ROOF Transposition and Orbicularis-Frontalis Sliding Maneuver.

This article delves into innovative surgical techniques, the open-book ROOF (retro-orbicularis oculi fat) transposition technique (OBRoof) and the orbicularis-frontalis sliding maneuver (OFS), designed for eyebrow and upper eyelid rejuvenation in the aging process. Emphasis is placed on understanding the dynamic changes occurring within the forehead and eyebrow envelope's five layers and their intrinsic relationships as well as the impact of the ROOF ptosis causing upper eyelid hooding. The OBRoof technique is highlighted for its effectiveness in addressing ptotic volume, offering a rejuvenated appearance by relocating volume to the supraciliary region.In the OFS, we explore the concept of extensive dissection above the upper border of the eyebrow to allow for free repositioning of the eyebrow. The stabilization is based on deep-plane facelift concepts, as the orbicularis oculi muscle corresponds to the superficial muscular aponeurotic system, and it is anchored to the deep layers (periosteum) by passing through the frontal muscle.In summary, this article provides a comprehensive exploration of innovative and minimally invasive techniques for eyebrow and upper eyelid rejuvenation, shedding light on their anatomical foundations, procedural intricacies, and the potential for achieving natural and lasting outcomes.

A Novel Treatment for Convex Lateral Crura: The Inverted Spanning Suture.

Rhinoplasty is one of the most complex and challenging procedures in plastic surgery, even for experienced surgeons. Among the steps leading to an aesthetic and functional nose, there is the nasal tip improvement. Today's approach to nasal tip is the product of different techniques shifting through time, mainly from a resection tendency, to preservation and suture use to reshape cartilages. Addressing the lateral crura is vital to an aesthetic nasal tip and it is frequently obtained by adequate suture techniques. The alar-spanning suture described by Perkins is one of such. Regardless of its importance, it was not able to improve convex crura in some cases. The inverted alar-spanning suture (ISS) is an adaptation designed to treat those cases with the suture alone. ISS is a novel technique that can lead to better results treating the convex lateral crura by distributing the force vector in a more effective way. New techniques in rhinoplasty have multiplied, bringing this procedure to a new level and keeping up with the updated notion of restoration instead of excision the ISS is a new, precise, approach to an old problem.

Cable and Mirror Sutures and the Nasal Septum Sublaminar Dissection.

Managing the nasal septum (NS) position is crucial in septorhinoplasty. The analysis and the preparation of the anterior nasal spine and the quadrangular cartilage as well as the strategy defined to efficiently stabilize the septum will dictate considerably the success of the result. Moreover, what we see in the surgical table can suffer modifications during the healing process because of poor fixation or the cheese-wire effect of the cartilage. We will present a logical sequence and tools to achieve a proper and stable position of the NS and the nasal pyramid. The sublaminar (supraperichondral) dissection of the quadrangular cartilage as an option to the subperichondral one and the use of cable and mirror sutures to three-dimensionally positioning and stabilizing the NS will be described.

Precision Segmental Preservation Rhinoplasty: Avoiding Widening, Defining New Dorsal Esthetic Lines in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty.

Experiencing great worldwide scientific excitement, the number of nose preservation surgeries has increased rapidly, promoting a considerable percentage of drawbacks and complications, causing many surgeons to recoil and return to classic resective techniques. In this study, we develop concepts that allow us to operate noses with preservation rhinoplasty that were previously considered to be among the absolute contraindications. Redefining new dorsal aesthetic lines, controlling the nasal lateral wall and the naso-facial groove surfaces, avoiding mid-vault widening and being precise in the design of bony and cartilaginous nasal profile, avoiding any type of irregularity, are strategies that will be presented.

Global Practice Patterns of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty.

Background: Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) has recently received significant academic attention in part due to theoretical benefits over excisional surgical methods. The purpose of this study was to assess the global practice patterns regarding this technique. Materials and Methods: An 11-item questionnaire was electronically distributed to regional academies/societies representing rhinoplasty surgeons worldwide. Respondent exposure to and use of DPR were assessed based on geographic location. Results: Eight hundred thirty-six responses were received. Despite early publications on DPR originating largely from Western Europe and the United States, Turkey and Mexico have the greatest use of DPR techniques currently. The familiarity across many regions with preservation techniques appear to be secondary to courses and conferences rather than incorporation into training. Mexico demonstrates the greatest exposure to DPR during training. One hundred twenty-five respondents had previously used but abandoned dorsal preservation techniques. Poor results, less predictability, and complications (largely hump recurrence) are cited as common reasons for this. Conclusion: There is variability in the global practice of DPR across regions and this will likely continue to evolve.

Conservative Surgery of the Nasal Dorsum: Septal Pyramidal Adjustment and Repositioning.

The term SPAR (septum pyramidal adjustment and repositioning), aims to conserve the nasal dorsum without detachment of the upper lateral nasal cartilage of the nasal septum, based on the Cotte's principles, unlike classical rhinoplasty. The aim of the study is to describe surgical technique of SPAR with the surgical steps used to reviewing the literature on the surgical treatment of the nasal dorsum. This is a less invasive form of rhinoplasty, but no less effective, not being necessary additional techniques to nasal reconstruction, and preservation of essential nasal structures. It is an evolution of push down and the other conservative surgery, making a more modern technique and may be suitable for most types of cavities. More studies are needed, especially comparative, showing the following late sequelae, complications, and their long-term results.

Avoiding Aesthetic Drawbacks and Stigmata in Dorsal Line Preservation Rhinoplasty.

For over a century, discussion on the management of nasal dorsum has been a struggle between the techniques of resection and preservation. This is because, each technique has its advantages and disadvantages, with the Joseph technique dominating over the past 30 years despite its surgical stigmas. The dorsum preservation techniques offers a good option for the treatment of nasal hump but like resective techniques it has its drawbacks. This may be the reason why preservation techniques withered but are now making a resurgence. The aim of this article is to describe how to avoid the aesthetic drawbacks of this technique depending on the selected approach.

Rhinoplasty Dissection Planes (Subcutaneous, Sub-SMAS, Supra-perichondral, and Sub-perichondral) and Soft Tissues Management.

Rhinoplasty as an operation is akin to a game of chess, where every maneuver will influence the eventual outcome. Undoubtedly, more than one approach to the nasal soft tissues envelop can produce beautiful and safe results as will be described in the paper namely, the subcutaneous, sub-superficial musculoaponeurotic system, supra- and sub-perichondral planes. For different justifiable reasons surgeons have their preferences, regarding dissection planes on the tip, middle and upper thirds, and regarding the manipulation of the soft tissue layers and nasal ligaments. The concept of the nasal layers and the presence of relevant ligamentous structures and how to restore them in an anatomical fashion, will help to understand the logic behind various approaches.

Looking for a cutoff value for the decongestant test in children suffering with turbinate hypertrophy.

OBJECTIVE: The main causes for objectively confirmed chronic impaired nasal breathing in children are adenoid and turbinate hypertrophy. Turbinate hypertrophy may be addressed by turbinate surgery. However, specialized guidelines include no specific indications for pediatric patients. The decongestant test consists of simulating the effect of turbinate surgery by means of a nasal decongestant. This project, developed by the YO-IFOS rhinology group, aims to establish a cutoff value for the nasal decongestant test with rhinomanometry to select children for turbinate surgery. METHODS: Children between 4 and 15 years of age were included. Cases were consecutively selected from children affected by turbinate hypertrophy undergoing turbinate radiofrequency ablation with or without adenoidectomy. Controls were consecutively selected from a sample of healthy children. All the subjects were examined with anterior active rhinomanometry with and without nasal decongestant. RESULTS: Sample included 72 cases and 24 healthy controls. There was a statistically significant difference in the improvement with the decongestant between cases (57.91%) and controls (15.67%). The ROC curve revealed an area under the curve of 0.97. The highest amount of correctly classified individuals (93.44%) corresponded to the cutoff value of 31.66%. However, the value with the highest specificity and highest Youden's index was the 38.88% improvement in nasal resistance with nasal decongestant. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a preliminary cutoff value for the decongestant test used with rhinomanometry in children has been established. This test could help identify children for turbinate surgery.

History of Dorsum Conservative Techniques in Rhinoplasty: The Evolution of a Revived Technique.

The correction and management of the nasal hump has been a classic problem in rhinoplasty since the beginning of the aesthetic purpose of this surgery. For many years, the resective technique described by Joseph has been the battle horse to solve this problem but it has several drawbacks if not done properly. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a new dorsal conservative technique was born and for several years was an alternative option to treat the same problem without damaging the keystone area while preserving the dorsal connection between the upper lateral cartilage and the septum. The aim of this article is to review the history and evolution of this technique, which has been reborn after several years, and how it has evolved since then.

The Segmental Preservation Rhinoplasty: The Split Tetris Concept.

Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty has seen considerable advances in the recent years as many doctors have improved and developed new ideas on the subject. In the era of minimal trauma surgery, it is important to achieve a beautiful nasal aesthetic result with minimum injury to the nose. Preserving the main structures of the nasal pyramid has been pursued for more than a century, and some different approaches have been described and developed since then. Their strengths and weakness have been shown. The present society's demand for perfection is an added reason for improving the stability and predictability of preservation rhinoplasty. We describe a brand-new philosophy of approaching the nasal dorsum hump that combines both safety and delicacy in dealing with the anatomical structures with elegancy and accuracy and achieving the aesthetic goal required.

A Segmental Approach in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: The Tetris Concept.

Rhinoplasty has become a detail-dependent surgery. With precise techniques better results have been achieved. We are continually searching for the ideal technique to offer predictable, accurate, and desired long-term results. Conservative rhinoplasty techniques have been described for more than 100 years as an alternative to dorsal resective surgeries and have reemerged as the new fashion among rhinoplasty surgeons. This article presents our philosophy when approaching the nasal dorsum regarding its segments and their specific anatomic aspects and surgical demands. We describe our intermediate septal strip approach, the intermediate split and the Tetris concept, and discuss their advantages and limitations.

Periorbital Surgical Anatomy.

This article discusses the periocular anatomy region thoroughly because its knowledge in detail is of paramount importance for any surgeon dedicated to periocular surgery or any practitioner who dedicate their practice to aesthetic medicine. Mastering the anatomical details permits obtaining consistently good results with the minimal amount of complications possible.

Postoperative Care of the Facial Plastic Surgery Patient-Forehead and Blepharoplasty.

In any kind of surgery, postoperative care is essential for a good result, but especially when the matter at stake is facial plastic surgery. Despite having performed a perfect surgery, with the least amount of damage to the soft tissues and osteocartilaginous structures, minimal bleeding, and in terms of the surgical time, without adequate postoperative care our results can be affected considerably in the short and long run. Therefore, we must have very clear guidelines regarding postoperative care and the duties of our patients, which should be emphasized during the informed consent of the intervention. It is also essential to comment on the warning signs of postoperative complications, which need to be detected and treated in time to achieve the expected post-surgery results. Before being discharged from the hospital, the patient again receives the postoperative instructions, as well as receiving a paper copy to avoid any possible misunderstandings. In this article, we will detail the postoperative care and complications of brow lift and upper and lower blepharoplasty.

Rhinoplasty-Do Patients and Surgeons See the Same? A Double-Blind Study with 100 Randomized Patients.

One of the key points of a successful rhinoplasty is communication between the patient and surgeon. The surgeon needs to get a clear understanding of the patient's motivation for surgery and expectations of the procedure. This information is mandatory in formulating an optimal surgical plan and managing realistic expectations of the procedures. Ideally, surgeons and patients see, discuss, and quantify the same nasal defects. In reality, the subjective nature of perceiving aesthetics can cause variability of inter-rating nasal appearance. Therefore, one might question how well surgeons understand their patients. Do they see what patients see? The aim of this study is to assess the level of agreement on the evaluation of nasal appearance between patients, surgeons, and nonphysicians observers, and try to find predictive factors that cause high interobserver variability. This prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study was performed on a total of 100 randomized patients undergoing rhinoplasty. All patients were photographed before surgery and asked to rate the appearance of their nose on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 indicating very ugly and 10 indicating very nice. Subsequently, the photographs of each patient were, independently, rated by two panels: one constituted by two rhinoplasty surgeons and the other by four nonmedical raters. Both panels included European raters from the north (The Netherlands) and south (Portugal). Data regarding age, gender, skin type, and major nasal deformity were also collected. The authors found that there is no statistical agreement between the aesthetical evaluation of the nose between patients and surgeons or patients and nonmedical raters. Based exclusively on the VAS for subjective evaluation of nasal appearance, the authors' findings show that surgeons and patients do not "see the same" and generally, the score attributed by the surgeon is more favorable (almost 1 point higher) than the auto-assessment's score. This is important to realize when communicating about nasal appearance before rhinoplasty.

Management of the Prominent Ear.

This article incorporates the opinions and preferred surgical options in managing patients of 3 prominent facial plastic surgeons who have large otoplasty practices. Six different questions covering the management of prominent ears are answered by the 3 practitioners. Nonsurgical options for the treatment of prominent ears are discussed. The role of cartilage-cutting and cartilage-sparing techniques as well as individual preferred otoplasty techniques are thoroughly covered. Postoperative management of these patients is presented by the individual surgeons.