Review on endobronchial therapies-current status and future.

There is a growing demand for lung parenchymal-sparing localized therapies due to the rising incidence of multifocal lung cancers and the growing number of patients who cannot undergo surgery. Lung cancer screening has led to the discovery of more pre-malignant or early-stage lung cancers, and the focus has shifted from treatment to prevention. Transbronchial therapy is an important tool in the local treatment of lung cancers, with microwave ablation showing promise based on early and mid-term results. To improve the precision and efficiency of transbronchial ablation, adjuncts such as mobile C-arm platforms, software to correct for computed tomography (CT)-to-body divergence, metal-containing nanoparticles, and robotic bronchoscopy are useful. Other forms of energy such as steam vapor therapy, pulsed electric field, and photodynamic therapy are being intensively investigated. In addition, the future of transbronchial therapies may involve the intratumoral injection of novel agents such as immunomodulating agents, gene therapies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Extensive pre-clinical and some clinical research has shown the synergistic abscopal effect of combination of these agents with ablation. This article aims to provide the latest updates on these technologies and explore their most likely future applications.

Neuroendocrine Lesions Arising From Mediastinal Teratoma-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Background. Neuroendocrine lesions arising from mediastinal teratomas are rare tumors with only small number of patients reported in literature. The behavior of these lesions appears to be different from traditional neuroendocrine neoplasms. A comprehensive review will be valuable for histologic assessment and treatment planning for similar cases. Case presentation. We present an example of a 57-year-old man who presented with cough. Subsequent work-up revealed an anterior mediastinal mass of 2.1 cm on computed tomography. The patient underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy. Histological examination revealed a mature cystic teratoma with a neuroendocrine component consisting of clusters of tumor cells with round to oval nuclei and a "salt-and-pepper" chromatin pattern. The tumor cells were immunoreactive to cytokeratin, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and INSM1, with a Ki-67 proliferative index of 4%. A histological diagnosis was mature teratoma with well-differentiated low-grade neuroendocrine tumor (carcinoid) was made. The patient was well and without disease after complete surgical excision at 10 months. Literature review. Literature reviewed yielded 13 examples of neuroendocrine lesions arising from mediastinal teratomas. No disease-related mortality was reported, even in lesions with high-grade neuroendocrine, carcinomatous, or immature teratomatous components. Conclusions. Surgical removal is the mainstay of treatment of these lesions, and the presence of a neuroendocrine component does not appear to negatively affect prognosis.

Radiation Principles, Protection, and Reporting for Interventional Pulmonology: A World Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology White Paper.

The use and availability of diverse advanced X-ray based imaging and guidance systems in the field of interventional pulmonology are rapidly growing. This popularity links inextricably to an increase in ionizing radiation use. Knowing ionizing radiation is hazardous, knowledge and competent use of X-ray imaging and guidance systems are important. The globally implemented As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle demands careful attention to minimize radiation exposure while achieving the precise goals of the intervention and imaging therein. To allow careful and targeted weighing of risk against reward while using X-ray based equipment, proper background knowledge of physics as well as imaging system aspects are needed. This white paper summarizes the principles of ionizing radiation which are crucial to enhance awareness and interpretation of dosimetric quantities. Consecutively, a consensus on standards for reporting radiation exposure in interventional pulmonology procedures is indicated to facilitate comparisons between different systems, approaches and results. Last but not least, it provides a list of practical measures, considerations and tips to optimize procedural imaging as well as reduce radiation dose to patients and staff.

Safety and feasibility of transbronchial microwave ablation for subpleural lung nodules.

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial microwave ablation in treating lung nodules is gaining popularity. However, microwave ablation in subpleural lung nodules raised concerns about pleural-based complications due to the proximity between the pleura and the ablation zone. METHODS: Patients who underwent transbronchial microwave ablation between March 2019 and November 2022 were included in this analysis. The lung nodules were categorized into the subpleural group-less than 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface; the deep nodule group-larger or equal to 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface. A review of the safety profile of subpleural lung nodule ablation was conducted. RESULTS: Eighty-two lung nodules (n = 82) from 77 patients were treated. The mean nodule size was 14.2 ± 5.50 mm. The technical success rate was 100%. The mean procedural time was 133 min. No statistically significant differences were detected in the complication rate and the length of stay between the subpleural and deep nodule groups. Complications occured in 21 nodules (25.6%). No minor pneumothorax was reported. Total five cases of pneumothorax required drainage were observed (6.06% in subpleural nodules [n = 2] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [n = 3], p = 0.991). Total seven cases of pleuritic chest pain were observed (12.1% in subpleural nodules [n = 4] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [n = 3], p = 0.340). CONCLUSIONS: This single-center retrospective analysis found no significant difference in the safety outcomes between subpleural and nonsubpleural lung nodule ablation. The overall rate of complications was low in the cohort. This demonstrated that transbronchial microwave was feasible and safe for most lung nodules.

SMARCA4 deficiency and mutations are frequent in large cell lung carcinoma and are prognostically significant.

SMARCA4 mutation has emerged as a marker of poor prognosis in lung cancer and has potential predictive value in cancer treatment, but recommendations for which patients require its investigation are lacking. We comprehensively studied SMARCA4 alterations and the clinicopathological significance in a large cohort of immunohistochemically-subtyped non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 1416 patients was studied for the presence of SMARCA4 deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Thereafter, comprehensive sequencing of tumours was performed for 397 of these patients to study the mutational spectrum of SWI/SNF and SMARCA4 aberrations. IHC evidence of SMARCA4 deficiency was found in 2.9% of NSCLC. Of the sequenced tumours, 38.3% showed aberration in SWI/SNF complex, and 9.3% had SMARCA4 mutations. Strikingly, SMARCA4 aberrations were much more prevalent in large cell carcinoma (LCC) than other histological tumour subtypes. SMARCA4-deficient and SMARCA4-mutated tumours accounted for 40.5% and 51.4% of all LCC, respectively. Multivariable analyses confirmed SMARCA4 mutation was an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer. The immunophenotype of a subset of these tumours frequently showed TTF1 negativity and HepPAR1 positivity. SMARCA4 mutation or its deficiency was associated with positive smoking history and poor prognosis. It also demonstrated mutual exclusion with EGFR mutation. Taken together, the high incidence of SMARCA4 aberrations in LCC may indicate its diagnostic and prognostic value. Our study established the necessity of SMARCA4 IHC in the identification of SMARCA4-aberrant tumours, and this may be of particular importance in LCC and tumours without known driver events.

Protocol to study immunodynamics in the tumor microenvironment using a tyramide signal amplification-based immunofluorescent multiplex panel.

Immunodynamics in the tumor microenvironment can be precisely examined by using multiple antigen identification approaches. Here, we present a protocol for capturing expression levels of multiple target proteins in the same specimen at single-cell resolution using a tyramide signal amplification-based immunofluorescent multiplexing system. We describe steps for tumor tissue microarray preparation, multiplex immunohistochemistry staining, image acquisition, and quantification. This protocol can quantify immune cells in tissues from patients or experimental disease models at a protein level. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Chung et al. (2023),1 Tang et al. (2022),2 and Tang et al. (2022).3.

Transbronchial Microwave Ablation of Peripheral Lung Tumors: The NAVABLATE Study.

BACKGROUND: Image-guided thermal ablation is a minimally invasive local therapy for lung malignancies. NAVABLATE characterized the safety and performance of transbronchial microwave ablation (MWA) in the lung. METHODS: The prospective, single-arm, 2-center NAVABLATE study (NCT03569111) evaluated transbronchial MWA in patients with histologically confirmed lung malignancies ≤30 mm in maximum diameter who were not candidates for, or who declined, both surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Ablation of 1 nodule was allowed per subject. The nodule was reached with electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to verify the ablation catheter position and to evaluate the ablation zone postprocedure. The primary end point was composite adverse events related to the transbronchial MWA device through 1-month follow-up. Secondary end points included technical success (nodule reached and ablated according to the study protocol) and technique efficacy (satisfactory ablation based on 1-month follow-up imaging). RESULTS: Thirty subjects (30 nodules; 66.7% primary lung, 33.3% oligometastatic) were enrolled from February 2019 to September 2020. The pre-procedure median nodule size was 12.5 mm (range 5 to 27 mm). Procedure-day technical success was 100% (30/30), with a mean ablative margin of 9.9±2.7 mm. One-month imaging showed 100% (30/30) technique efficacy. The composite adverse event rate related to the transbronchial MWA device through 1-month follow-up was 3.3% (1 subject, mild hemoptysis). No deaths or pneumothoraces occurred. Four subjects (13.3%) experienced grade 3 complications; none had grade 4 or 5. CONCLUSION: Transbronchial microwave ablation is an alternative treatment modality for malignant lung nodules ≤30 mm. There were no deaths or pneumothorax. In all, 13.3% of patients developed grade 3 or above complications.

Impact of lymphadenectomy extent on immunotherapy efficacy in postresectional recurred non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) dissection is a common procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to ascertain disease severity and treatment options. However, murine studies have indicated that excising tumor-draining LNs diminished immunotherapy effectiveness, though its applicability to clinical patients remains uncertain. Hence, the authors aim to illustrate the immunological implications of LN dissection by analyzing the impact of dissected LN (DLN) count on immunotherapy efficacy, and to propose a novel 'immunotherapy-driven' LN dissection strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients underwent anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for recurrence between 2018 and 2020, assessing outcomes based on DLN count stratification. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included, of whom 59 had a DLN count less than or equal to 16 (median, IQR: 11, 7-13); 66 had a DLN count greater than 16 (median, IQR: 23, 19-29). With a median follow-up time of 14.3 months (95% CI: 11.0-17.6), the overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 (95% CI: 4.1-11.7) months, 11.7 (95% CI: 7.9-15.6) months in the combination therapy subgroup, and 4.8 (95% CI: 3.1-6.4) months in the immunotherapy alone subgroup, respectively. In multivariable Cox analysis, DLN count less than or equal to 16 is associated with an improved PFS in all cohorts [primary cohort: HR=0.26 (95% CI: 0.07-0.89), P =0.03]; [validation cohort: HR=0.46 (95% CI: 0.22-0.96), P =0.04]; [entire cohort: HR=0.53 (95% CI: 0.32-0.89), P =0.02]. The prognostic benefit of DLN count less than or equal to 16 was more significant in immunotherapy alone, no adjuvant treatment, pN1, female, and squamous carcinoma subgroups. A higher level of CD8+ central memory T cell (Tcm) within LNs was associated with improved PFS (HR: 0.235, 95% CI: 0.065-0.845, P =0.027). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated DLN count (cutoff: 16) was associated with poorer immunotherapy efficacy in recurrent NSCLC, especially pronounced in the immunotherapy alone subgroup. CD8+Tcm proportions in LNs may also impact immunotherapy efficacy. Therefore, for patients planned for adjuvant immunotherapy, a precise rather than expanded lymphadenectomy strategy to preserve immune-depending LNs is recommended.

Hematopoietic Transcription Factor RUNX1 is Essential for Promoting Macrophage-Myofibroblast Transition in Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Macrophage-myofibroblast transition (MMT) is a newly discovered pathway for mass production of pro-tumoral cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) in a TGF-ß1/Smad3 dependent manner. Better understanding its regulatory signaling in tumor microenvironment (TME) may identify druggable target for the development of precision medicine. Here, by dissecting the transcriptome dynamics of tumor-associated macrophage at single-cell resolution, a crucial role of a hematopoietic transcription factor Runx1 in MMT formation is revealed. Surprisingly, integrative bioinformatic analysis uncovers Runx1 as a key regulator in the downstream of MMT-specific TGF-ß1/Smad3 signaling. Stromal Runx1 level positively correlates with the MMT-derived CAF abundance and mortality in NSCLC patients. Mechanistically, macrophage-specific Runx1 promotes the transcription of genes related to CAF signatures in MMT cells at genomic level. Importantly, macrophage-specific genetic deletion and systemic pharmacological inhibition of TGF-ß1/Smad3/Runx1 signaling effectively prevent MMT-driven CAF and tumor formation in vitro and in vivo, representing a potential therapeutic target for clinical NSCLC.

Treatment strategies for malignant pulmonary nodule: beyond lobectomy. Point-counterpoint.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Technological advancement in low-dose computed tomography resulted in an increased incidental discovery of early-stage lung cancer and multifocal ground glass opacity. The demand for parenchyma-preserving treatment strategies is greater now than ever. Pulmonary ablative therapy is a groundbreaking technique to offer local ablative treatment in a lung-sparing manner. It has become a promising technique in lung cancer management with its diverse applicability. In this article, we will review the current development of ablative therapy in lung and look into the future of this innovative technique. RECENT FINDINGS: Current literature suggests that ablative therapy offers comparable local disease control to other local therapies and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), with a low risk of complications. In particular, bronchoscopic microwave ablation (BMWA) has considerably fewer pleural-based complications due to the avoidance of pleural puncture. BMWA can be considered in the multidisciplinary treatment pathway as it allows re-ablation and allows SBRT after BMWA. SUMMARY: With the benefits which ablative therapy offers and its ability to incorporate into the multidisciplinary management pathway, we foresee ablative therapy, especially BMWA gaining significance in lung cancer treatment. Future directions on developing novel automated navigation platforms and the latest form of ablative energy would further enhance clinical outcomes for our patients.

Concomitant electromagnetic navigation transbronchial microwave ablation of multiple lung nodules is safe, time-saving, and cost-effective.

Objectives: Transbronchial microwave ablation of lung nodules using electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is an emerging local therapy for lung oligometastases and multifocal lung cancers as part of a lung-preserving strategy. Concomitant ablation of multiple lung nodules in a single operating session may provide a one-stop solution. Methods: Between April 2019 and April 2023, 25 patients had 2 or more lung nodules ablated concomitantly in our hybrid operating room. Nodules were proven or highly suspicious of malignancies or metastases. Feasibility and safety were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 56 nodules in 25 patients received concomitant multi-nodular ablation. The mean age of patients was 60 years, and the reasons for the lung-preserving strategy were multifocal lung cancers (80%) and lung oligometastases (20%). Among those with multifocal disease, 65% had previous major lung resection for lung cancer. Two to 4 nodules were ablated in each session. The mean nodule size was 9.9 mm (range, 5-20 mm), and the mean minimal margin was 5.9 mm. When comparing concomitant nodule ablation with the 103 single-nodule ablations performed in our institute, a mean of 86 minutes of operative time and 131 minutes of anesthetic time were saved. There were no increased complications despite overlapping ablation zones, and the mean hospital stay was 1.23 days. The rate of pneumothorax was 8%, and that of pleural effusion, pain, and fever was 4% respectively. Conclusions: Concomitant transbronchial microwave ablation of multiple lung nodules is feasible, safe, and associated with reduction in overall anesthetic and operative time. It is an important armamentarium in the contemporary lung-preserving strategy for battling multifocal lung cancers or lung oligometastases.

The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique.

Background: Existing reporting guidelines pay insufficient attention to the detail and comprehensiveness reporting of surgical technique. The Surgical techniqUe rePorting chEcklist and standaRds (SUPER) aims to address this gap by defining reporting standards for surgical technique. The SUPER guideline intends to apply to articles that encompass surgical technique in any study design, surgical discipline, and stage of surgical innovation. Methods: Following the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network approach, 16 surgeons, journal editors, and methodologists reviewed existing reporting guidelines relating to surgical technique, reviewed papers from 15 top journals, and brainstormed to draft initial items for the SUPER. The initial items were revised through a three-round Delphi survey from 21 multidisciplinary Delphi panel experts from 13 countries and regions. The final SUPER items were formed after an online consensus meeting to resolve disagreements and a three-round wording refinement by all 16 SUPER working group members and five SUPER consultants. Results: The SUPER reporting guideline includes 22 items that are considered essential for good and informative surgical technique reporting. The items are divided into six sections: background, rationale, and objectives (items 1 to 5); preoperative preparations and requirements (items 6 to 9); surgical technique details (items 10 to 15); postoperative considerations and tasks (items 16 to 19); summary and prospect (items 20 and 21); and other information (item 22). Conclusions: The SUPER reporting guideline has the potential to guide detailed, comprehensive, and transparent surgical technique reporting for surgeons. It may also assist journal editors, peer reviewers, systematic reviewers, and guideline developers in the evaluation of surgical technique papers and help practitioners to better understand and reproduce surgical technique. Trial Registration: https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-other-study-designs/#SUPER.

The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique: explanation and elaboration.

Background: Surgical technique plays an essential role in achieving good health outcomes. However, the quality of surgical technique reporting remains heterogeneous. Reporting checklists could help authors to describe the surgical technique more transparently and effectively, as well as to assist reviewers and editors evaluate it more informatively, and promote readers to better understand the technique. We previously developed SUPER (surgical technique reporting checklist and standards) to assist authors in reporting their research that contains surgical technique more transparently. However, further explanation and elaboration of each item are needed for better understanding and reporting practice. Methods: We searched surgical literature in PubMed, Google Scholar and journal websites published up to January 2023 to find multidiscipline examples in various article types for each SUPER item. Results: We explain the 22 items of the SUPER and provide rationales item by item alongside. We provide 69 examples from 53 literature that present optimal reporting of the 22 items. Article types of examples include pure surgical technique, and case reports, observational studies and clinical trials that contain surgical technique. Examples are multidisciplinary, including general surgery, orthopaedical surgery, cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, neurological surgery, oncogenic surgery, and emergency surgery etc. Conclusions: Along with SUPER article, this explanation and elaboration file can promote deeper understanding on the SUPER items. We hope that the article could further guide surgeons and researchers in reporting, and assist editors and peer reviewers in reviewing manuscripts related to surgical technique.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy and thermal ablation for treatment of NSCLC: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

RATIONALE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Use of image guided thermal ablation (IGTA; including microwave ablation [MWA] and radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) has increased in NSCLC, however there are no studies comparing all three. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of IGTA (including MWA and RFA) and SBRT for the treatment of NSCLC. METHODS: Published literature databases were systematically searched for studies assessing MWA, RFA, or SBRT. Local tumor progression (LTP), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed with single-arm pooled analyses and meta-regressions in NSCLC patients and a stage IA subgroup. Study quality was assessed with a modified methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS: Forty IGTA study-arms (2,691 patients) and 215 SBRT study-arms (54,789 patients) were identified. LTP was lowest after SBRT at one and two years in single-arm pooled analyses (4% and 9% vs. 11% and 18%) and at one year in meta-regressions when compared to IGTA (OR = 0.2, 95%CI = 0.07-0.63). MWA patients had the highest DFS of all treatments in single-arm pooled analyses. In meta-regressions at two and three-years, DFS was significantly lower for RFA compared to MWA (OR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.12-0.58; OR = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.16-0.66, respectively). OS was similar across modalities, timepoints, and analyses. Older age, male patients, larger tumors, retrospective studies, and non-Asian study region were also predictors of worse clinical outcomes. In high-quality studies (MINORS score ≥ 7), MWA patients had better clinical outcomes than the overall analysis. Stage IA MWA patients had lower LTP, higher OS, and generally lower DFS, compared to the main analysis of all NSCLC patients. CONCLUSIONS: NSCLC patients had comparable outcomes after SBRT and MWA, which were better than those with RFA.

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy transbronchial lung nodule ablation with IllumisiteTM platform corrects CT-to-body divergence with tomosynthesis and improves ablation workflow: a case report.

Background: Transbronchial ablation of lung nodules is gaining popularity as part of lung-preserving strategy for patients with multifocal lung cancers or multiple lung oligometastases. Accuracy in placement of ablation catheter is of utmost importance in order to achieve adequate ablation margin. However, older systems are not precise enough for confident placement of ablation catheter and often require multiple cone-beam CT (CBCT) to confirm and readjust its position. The following case is the first microwave lung ablation utilizing the novel IllumisiteTM platform (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in the hybrid operating room (HOR), with enhanced accuracy and workflow. Case Description: A 66-year-old lady had multiple resected adenocarcinomas in bilateral lungs. Upon CT monitoring a right middle lobe (RML) ground glass opacity with solid centre was found to be suspicious due to increasing size and density. Transbronchial electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) microwave ablation of the lesion was performed as part of lung-conserving strategy. After initial navigation, the adjusted nodule position provided by the IllumisiteTM platform after correcting the CT-to-body divergence prompted operators to renavigate and readjust the position of the locatable guide (LG) swiftly to gain accurate access to the nodule, which was confirmed by CBCT. Positional data at the tip of extended working channel (EWC) also allowed precise placement of needle for subsequent ablation. Conclusions: IllumisiteTM is a novel electromagnetic navigational platform that corrects for CT-to-body divergence and ensures continuous locational information by an additional positional coil in the tip of EWC. This precision is especially important for the placement of ablation catheter, as slight deviation would lead to insufficient ablation margin and future recurrence. Workflow is improved by reducing the number of CBCT required for instrument position adjustment.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Ablation Versus Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer in High-Risk Patients.

Current treatment for early-stage lung cancer focuses on surgical intervention as the mainstay of treatment; however, this poses issues in patients that are high-risk or unable to tolerate any operation. In this case, sublobar resection or radiation therapy has been the primary treatment for these subsets of patients. Alternative approaches include stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and thermal ablation. In this article, we focus on treatment strategies using SBRT, thermal ablation, or surgery as it pertains to high-risk patients with early-stage lung cancer.