Qualitative hepatitis C virus RNA assay identifies active infection with sufficient viral load for treatment among Phetchabun residents in Thailand.

The World Health Organization envisions the elimination of viral hepatitis by 2030 through reducing prevalence and transmission, increasing diagnostic screening, and expanding treatment coverage. Efforts to micro-eliminate hepatitis in Phetchabun province in Thailand, a region where the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and liver cancer is higher than elsewhere in the country, began with evaluating the province-wide burden of HCV. Here, we describe a feasibility study to assess active HCV infection by screening Phetchabun residents ages 35 to 69 years for anti-HCV antibodies by using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) at the point of care. Positive anti-HCV results were further evaluated for active infection using qualitative HCV RNA assay, followed by quantitative HCV viral load determination in a subset of samples. Currently, we have identified 6.2% (10,621/170,163) anti-HCV positive individuals, of whom 74.9% (3,930/5,246) demonstrated detectable viral RNA. Quantitative test found that 97.5% (1,001/1,027) had HCV viral load ≥5,000 IU/mL. Thus, primary screening with anti-HCV RDT followed by qualitative HCV RNA evaluation could identify active and chronic HCV infection in almost all individuals with a viral load ≥5,000 IU/mL, which is the current threshold for treatment dictated by Thailand's National Health Security Office. Our data suggest that qualitative HCV RNA evaluation may obviate the need for the more expensive quantitative HCV viral load test and reduce a significant barrier toward HCV elimination in a middle-income country.

Prescreening with a Rapid Diagnostic Test Followed by a Confirmatory Qualitative Nucleic Acid Test Can Simplify Hepatitis C Diagnosis.

Asymptomatic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection without treatment is associated with chronic liver diseases including hepatocellular carcinoma. A major obstacle to hepatitis C diagnosis leading to antiviral treatment in some developing countries is the complicated HCV testing required before treatment. To simplify an HCV test-to-treat strategy, which could lead to timely diagnosis and treatment at the point-of-care, we evaluated the performance of four anti-HCV rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) (Abon, Blue Cross, Healgen, and SD Bioline). They yielded comparable sensitivity (80-83%), specificity (99-100%), and accuracy (90-91.5%). When we field-tested Abon in 4,769 residents of an HCV-endemic province in Thailand, 306 seropositive individuals (6.4%) were identified. In comparison, laboratory test using an automated commercial chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Abbott ARCHITECT) identified slightly more seropositives (327% or 6.9%). Field implementation suggests that Abon was sensitive (88.7%), specific (99.6%), and accurate (98.9%). Furthermore, 82% (250/306) of Abon-positive samples had detectable HCV RNA as determined by nucleic acid test (Roche cobas). The same 250 samples out of 327 reactive in Abbott immunoassay also had detectable HCV RNA (mean RNA level: log 6.28 IU/mL, range: log 3.06- 7.78 IU/mL). The use of RDT followed by qualitative nucleic acid test can cost-effectively identify the majority of HCV seropositive individuals with active infection, which will obviate the need for expensive viral load quantification tests when simplifying HCV diagnosis for the test-to-treat program at the point-of-care.