Pyridostigmine to Reduce the duration of postoperative Ileus after Colorectal surgery (PyRICo-RCT): randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus, driven by the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, is the most common complication in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. By inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, pyridostigmine can potentially modulate the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway and accelerate gastrointestinal recovery. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of pyridostigmine in improving gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery. METHODS: This double-blinded RCT enrolled adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at two hospitals in South Australia. Patients were randomized to 60 mg oral pyridostigmine or placebo twice daily starting 6 h after surgery until the first passage of stool. The primary outcome was GI-2, a validated composite measure of time to first stool and tolerance of oral diet. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postoperative ileus (defined as GI-2 greater than 4 days), duration of hospital stay, and 30-day complications, evaluated by intention-to-treat univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 130 patients recruited (mean(s.d.) age 58.4(16.4) years; 73 men, 56%), 65 were allocated to each arm. The median GI-2 was 1 day shorter with pyridostigmine compared with placebo (2 (i.q.r. 1-3) versus 3 (2-4) days; P = 0.015). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative ileus (17.2 versus 21.5%; P = 0.532) or duration of hospital stay (median 5 (i.q.r. 4-8.75) versus 5 (4-7.5) days; P = 0.921). Similarly, there were no significant differences in overall complications, anastomotic leak, cardiac complications, or patient-reported side effects. CONCLUSION: Pyridostigmine resulted in a quicker return of GI-2 and was well tolerated. Larger multicentre studies are required to determine the optimal dosing and evaluate the impact of pyridostigmine in different surgical settings. Registration number: ACTRN12621000530820 (https://anzctr.org.au).

Functional outcomes following anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a needs assessment and proposal of a nurse-led remote management algorithm.

AIM: With the rise of structured, remote follow-up of colorectal cancers, there is the potential risk of underdiagnosing and undermanaging low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This cohort study aims to determine the rate of LARS and its patterns of care, with the aim of generating a risk-stratified management algorithm that can be employed for nurse-led follow-up. METHOD: Patients who underwent elective anterior resection for the management of colorectal cancer between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 were sent quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-CR29 and LARS score) and surveyed for LARS symptoms and management utilized. RESULTS: Out of 70 patients who completed questionnaires, 71.4% had LARS and 42.9% had major LARS. The international Delphi consensus definition identified more patients (n = 50) with LARS than the LARS score (n = 41). Tumours located <8 cm from the anal verge, ULAR, and temporary stoma were predictive of major LARS on univariate analysis. However, only temporary stoma was predictive for LARS (OR 7.89 (1.15-53.95), P = 0.035) and majors LARS (8.14 (1.79-37.01), P = 0.007) on multivariate analysis. Forty-four percent of patients with LARS did not have input from any health professional for this condition. Consultation with specialist allied health and/or colorectal surgeons ranged from 4% to 22%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that with the current remote follow-up system focused on cancer outcomes a significant proportion of patients with LARS are overlooked, resulting in the underutilization of relevant health professionals and management options. We propose a nurse-led management algorithm to address this issue while still minimizing surgical outpatient load.

Incidence and associated morbidity of sarcopenia in non-malignant small and large bowel anastomosis: propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor for poor outcomes in colorectal cancer, but data are scarce in colorectal surgery for benign conditions where patients could benefit from a deferral of surgery to enter a prehabilitation programme. We assessed the incidence of sarcopenia and complications in patients with benign colorectal disease. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective non-malignant colorectal surgery during 2018-2022 were retrospectively identified. The cross-sectional psoas area was calculated using computed tomography (CT) imaging mid-3rd lumbar vertebrae. Sarcopenia was determined using gender-specific cut-offs. The primary outcome was complications measured by the comprehensive complication index (CCI). RESULTS: Of 188 patients identified, 39 (20.7%) were sarcopenic. Patients diagnosed with sarcopenia were older (63 vs. 58 years, p = 0.047) and had a reduced BMI (24.7 vs. 27.38 kg/m2, p = 0.001). Sarcopenic patients had more complications (82.1 vs. 64.4%, p = 0.036), and CCI was statistically but not clinically higher (20.9 vs. 20.9, p = 0.047). On univariate linear regression analysis, age ≥ 65 years old, ASA grade ≥ 3, active smokers, sarcopenia, and preoperative anaemia were predictive of CCI. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed, matching 78 cases to remove selection bias, which demonstrated sarcopenia had no impact on postoperative complications. On multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.022), smoking (p = 0.005), and preoperative anaemia (p = 0.008) remained predictive of CCI. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is prevalent in one-fifth of patients undergoing benign colorectal surgery. Taking advantage of the longer preoperative waiting periods, sarcopenia could be explored as a target for prehabilitation programmes to improve outcomes.

Double barrelled uro-colostomy versus Ileal conduit for urinary diversion following pelvic exenteration: a single centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: The ideal method for urinary diversion following total pelvic exenteration (TPE) remains unclear. This study compares the outcomes of double-barrelled uro-colostomy (DBUC) and ileal conduit (IC) in a single Australian centre. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent pelvic exenteration with the formation of either a DBUC or an IC between 2008 and November 2022 were identified from the prospective database from the Royal Adelaide Hospital and St. Andrews Hospital. Demographic, operative characteristics, general perioperative, long-term urological and other relevant surgical complications were compared via univariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 135 patients undergoing exenteration, 39 patients were eligible for inclusion: 16 patients with a DBUC, and 23 patients with an IC. More patients in the DBUC group had previous radiotherapy (93.8% vs. 65.2%, P = 0.056) and flap pelvic reconstruction (93.7% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.002). The rate of ureteric stricture trended higher in the DBUC group (25.0% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.21), but in contrast, urine leak (6.3% vs. 8.7%, P>0.999), urosepsis (43.8% vs. 60.9%, P = 0.29), anastomotic leak (0.0% vs. 4.3%, P>0.999), and stomal complications requiring repair (6.3% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.63) trended lower. These differences were not statistically significant. Rates of grade III or greater complications were similar; however, no patients in the DBUC group died within 30-days or had grade IV complications requiring ICU admission compared with two deaths and one grade IV complication in the IC group. CONCLUSION: DBUC is a safe alternative to IC for urinary diversion following TPE, with potentially fewer complications. Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes are required.

Endoscopic Evaluation of Biliary Strictures: Current and Emerging Techniques.

The diagnosis of biliary strictures in clinical practice can be challenging. Discriminating between benign and malignant biliary strictures is important to prevent the morbidity and mortality associated with incorrect diagnoses. Missing a malignant biliary stricture may delay surgery, resulting in poor prognostic outcomes. Conversely, it has been demonstrated that approximately 20% of patients who undergo surgery for suspected biliary malignancies have a benign etiology on histopathology. Traditional tissue sampling using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography does not always produce a definitive diagnosis, with a considerable proportion of cases remaining as indeterminate biliary strictures. Recent advances in endoscopic techniques have the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of biliary strictures.

The missing spleen - A diagnosis of medical identity fraud in surgery: Case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Medical identity fraud is a growing concern in surgery and can adversely affect patient care. Fraudulent medical information can result in misdiagnoses or inadequate preoperative workup of surgical patients. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old female presented to hospital with a fishbone-related oesophageal perforation. Unbeknownst to the surgical team, the patient was committing medical identity fraud and impersonating another 57-year-old female. She underwent a gastroscopy with removal of the fishbone while her true identity remained concealed. A progress CT scan performed three days post-gastroscopy revealed an absent spleen, which was present on ultrasound as recent as three weeks prior to her admission. The patient was confronted about this discrepancy and confessed to committing medical identity fraud. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Detection of medical identity fraud remains a challenging problem in healthcare systems worldwide. Various methods have been proposed to improve detection of medical identity fraud but there has been limited studies on their effectiveness in hospital settings. Given the serious health repercussions that can arise from medical identity fraud, it is imperative that better detection methods become available in the future. CONCLUSION: Medical identity fraud is a complex problem that requires better detection methods to prevent patient harm. Surgeons should be aware of the adverse health consequences that can arise from medical identity fraud.

Laparoscopic colopexy for neo-left colonic volvulus 10 years after anterior resection.

Recurrent neo-left colonic volvulus is a rare complication following anterior resection. The conventional approach to treating recurrent volvulus is a large bowel resection with anastomosis or colostomy formation after successful endoscopic decompression. However, in elderly and comorbid patients, this can result in significant morbidity or mortality. Laparoscopic colopexy is a less invasive alternative that has not been previously reported for the treatment of neo-left colonic volvulus. We describe a case of an 86-year-old male who presented with recurrent neo-left colonic volvulus 10 years post-laparoscopic anterior resection for cancer. A laparoscopic colopexy was performed to resolve the volvulus and prevent future recurrence. Interrupted prolene sutures were used to fix the neo-left colon to the posterior stomach and the left lateral abdominal wall. The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative recovery and was discharged 6 days after surgery. He was well at 6 months follow-up.

Pattern of care for cancer of the oesophagus in a western population.

BACKGROUND: Most oesophageal outcome research focuses on surgical treatment, despite most patients not undergoing surgery as they are unfit or have metastatic disease. Few studies have evaluated the patterns of care for all patients presenting with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: All patients with oesophageal cancer, and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), presented at the South Australian state-wide upper gastrointestinal cancer multidisciplinary team from 2012 to 2015 were reviewed to determine the patterns of presentation and treatment. RESULTS: A total of 375 patients were included. Diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 69.6%, squamous cell carcinoma in 24.8% and HGD in 5.6%. The majority of patients presented with stages II and III disease (56.8%). A total of 51.5% were treated with curative intent, with 28.8% undergoing surgery and/or neoadjuvant therapy. Treatment was palliative in 48.5%, with chemoradiotherapy utilized in 20.8%. Disease stage and age impacted treatment intent. All patients with HGD received curative treatment versus 89.7%/63.8%/1% of patients with stage I/II and III/IV disease, respectively. A total of 56.9% of patients <80 years received curative treatment versus 25% of those >80 years old. CONCLUSION: Whilst approximately half of patients underwent treatment with curative intent, only a minority underwent surgery. Future efforts to improve survival outcomes for oesophageal cancer should address patients who are unfit for surgery and those presenting with metastatic disease.

Magnesium sulphate for women at term for neuroprotection of the fetus.

BACKGROUND: Magnesium sulphate is extensively used in obstetrics for the treatment and prevention of eclampsia. A recent meta-analysis has shown that magnesium sulphate is an effective fetal neuroprotective agent when given antenatally to women at risk of very preterm birth. Term infants account for more than half of all cases of cerebral palsy, and the incidence has remained fairly constant. It is important to assess if antenatal administration of magnesium sulphate to women at term protects the fetus from brain injury, and associated neurosensory disabilities including cerebral palsy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of magnesium sulphate given to women at term as a neuroprotective agent for the fetus. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trial Register (31 July 2012) and the reference lists of other Cochrane reviews assessing magnesium sulphate in pregnancy. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing antenatally administered magnesium sulphate to women at term with placebo, no treatment or a different fetal neuroprotective agent. We also planned to include cluster-randomised trials, and exclude cross-over trials and quasi-randomised trials. We planned to exclude studies reported as abstracts only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and for risk of bias. Two authors independently extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: We included one trial (involving 135 women with mild pre-eclampsia at term). An additional six studies are awaiting further assessment.The included trial compared magnesium sulphate with a placebo and was at a low risk of bias. The trial did not report any of this review's prespecified primary outcomes. There was no significant difference between magnesium sulphate and placebo in Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (risk ratio (RR) 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 5.46; 135 infants), nor gestational age at birth (mean difference (MD) -0.20 weeks; 95% CI -0.62 to 0.22; 135 infants).There were significantly more maternal side effects (feeling warm and flushed) in the magnesium sulphate group than in the placebo group (RR 3.81; 95% CI 2.22 to 6.53; 135 women). However, no significant difference in adverse effects severe enough to cease treatment was observed (RR 3.04; 95% CI 0.13 to 73.42; 135 women). There were no significant differences seen between groups in the rates of postpartum haemorrhage (RR 4.06; 95% CI 0.47 to 35.38; 135 women) and caesarean section (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.63; 135 women). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulphate when administered to women for neuroprotection of the term fetus. As there has been recent evidence for the use of magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection of the preterm fetus, high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the safety profile and neurological outcomes for the term fetus. Strategies to reduce maternal side effects during treatment also require evaluation.