Management of patients with a persistently elevated PSA after radical prostatectomy: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: The management of the postoperative biological relapse of prostate cancer is most often based on salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with or without the addition of a variable duration of hormone therapy (HT). The indications for SRT +/- HT are established in the setting of a rising PSA level after a period where an undetectable PSA was achieved. However, in case of detectable PSA immediately after radical prostatectomy, the treatment options and prognosis are still unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a narrative review based on an analysis of the literature focusing on articles targeting the population of patients with postoperative persistently detectable PSA level. Case reports, original articles, clinical trials, and published reviews were studied for this purpose. CONCLUSION: This article will describe current management of patients with detectable PSA immediately after radical prostatectomy, notably the contribution of modern imaging and new treatment options involving the combination of RT and HT.

Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation With a Simultaneous Hypofractionated Integrated Prostate Boost for Localised Prostate Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?

External beam radiotherapy is a standard treatment option for localised prostate cancer and hypofractionation has become an alternative to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. In patients who receive external beam radiotherapy, elective pelvic nodal irradiation is sometimes delivered, especially in patients with unfavourable disease who are at risk of micrometastatic spread of cancer into the regional nodes. One elegant approach to combine prostate hypofractionation with elective pelvic nodal irradiation is with a simultaneous integrated boost technique, where a radical hypofractionated dose is delivered to the prostate while the regional pelvic nodes receive a lower microscopic dose simultaneously in a single radiotherapy plan over the same number of treatment fractions. This article reviews the existing published literature evaluating such an approach.

Combining prostate cancer radiotherapy with therapies targeting the androgen receptor axis.

Background: Prostate cancer (pca) is the most common non-dermatologic cancer and the 3rd leading cause of male cancer mortality in Canada. In patients with high-risk localized or recurrent pca, management typically includes the combination of long-term androgen deprivation therapy (adt) and radiotherapy (rt). New androgen-receptor-axis targeted therapies (arats), which await validation, offer an option to intensify therapy. Methods: In this narrative review, we report the relevant history that has supported combining adt with rt. The literature in PubMed was searched for studies involving pca and novel arats (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide) published between 1995 and 2019. Literature discussing clinical trials in which those modalities were combined was extracted and synthesized into a combined molecular and clinical discussion. Potential treatment intensification mechanisms and rationales are explored. Results: Early results from three phase i/ii trials demonstrated that concurrent abiraterone acetate, adt, and rt is safe, improves the extent of chemical castration, and is associated with limited treatment failures. A single in vitro study implies synergy for radiosensitization beyond that facilitated by conventional adt. Studies investigating the combination of other arats with rt are under way, including multiple phase iii trials, but short-term results are not yet available.

Randomised Phase II Feasibility Trial of Image-guided External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (CCTG PR15/ NCT01982786).

AIMS: We conducted a multicentre feasibility study to assess the ability to randomise patients between image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and IGRT + high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost and to adhere to appropriate radiation quality assurance standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary end point was to determine the ability to randomise 60 patients over an 18 month period. Arm 1 (IGRT) patients received 78 Gy in 39 fractions or 60 Gy in 20 fractions (physician's preference), whereas arm 2 (IGRT + HDR) received 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with HDR boost of 15 Gy. The secondary end points included >grade 3 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at 3 months, validation of a prospectively defined radiation oncology quality assurance to assess treatment compliance. All analyses were descriptive; no formal comparisons between treatment arms were carried out. RESULTS: Between April 2014 and September 2015, 57 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were randomised between IGRT alone (arm 1; n = 29) and IGRT plus HDR brachytherapy boost (arm 2; n = 28). Overall, 93% received the treatment as randomised. There were four patients (one on IGRT arm 1 and three patients on the IGRT + HDR arm 2) who were treated differently from randomisation assignment. For the 29 patients receiving IGRT (arm 1), there were 14 cases reported with minor deviations and three with major deviations. For patients on IGRT + HDR (arm 2), there were 18 cases reported with minor deviations and two with major deviations. At 3 months in the IGRT group (arm 1), one patient reported grade 3 diarrhoea, whereas in the IGRT + HDR group (arm 2), two patients reported grade 3 haematuria. No other gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: The pilot study showed the feasibility of randomisation between treatment with IGRT alone versus IGRT + HDR boost. Treatment compliance was good, including adherence to quality assurance standards.

CT-based adaptive high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy in the preoperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: Technical and practical aspects.

PURPOSE: During the last decade due to the availability of a CT scan in the brachytherapy suite, high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) has evolved as a CT-based daily adaptive treatment. An update of the technical and practical aspects of HDREBT is provided. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Description of technical and practical aspects of HDREBT focused on the preoperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. During preoperative HDREBT, 26 Gy is delivered in four daily applications of 6.5 Gy prescribed to the 100% isodose, covering the clinical target volume. Daily CT scans are obtained and used for plan optimization, leaving patient positioning unchanged between CT scan and treatment delivery. RESULTS: All steps of HDREBT treatment procedure are discussed in detail: flexible proctosigmoidoscopy and clipping; patient setup; applicator placement; target delineation; treatment planning and delivery; and patient care. Afterward, treatment results are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based adaptive preoperative HDREBT is a practical and feasible therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, offering excellent local control with a favorable toxicity profile.

Effect of preoperative treatment strategies on the outcome of patients with clinical T3, non-metastasized rectal cancer: A comparison between Dutch and Canadian expert centers.

AIM: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) appears to be associated with less treatment-related toxicity compared with external beam radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. The present study compared the effect of preoperative treatment strategies on overall survival, cancer-specific deaths, and local recurrences between a Dutch and Canadian expert center with different preoperative treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 145 Dutch and 141 Canadian patients with cT3, non-metastasized rectal cancer. All patients from Canada were preoperatively treated with HDRBT. The preoperative treatment strategy for Dutch patients consisted of either no preoperative treatment, short-course radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing overall survival. We adjusted for age, cN stage, (y)pT stage, comorbidity, and type of surgery. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were cancer-specific deaths and local recurrences. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival was 70.9% (95% CI 62.6%-77.7%) in Dutch patients compared with 86.9% (80.1%-91.6%) in Canadian patients, resulting in an adjusted HR of 0.70 (95% CI 0.39-1.26; p = 0.233). Of 145 Dutch patients, 6.9% (95% CI 2.8%-11.0%) had a local recurrence and 17.9% (95% CI 11.7%-24.2%) patients died of rectal cancer, compared with 4.3% (95% CI 0.9%-7.5%) local recurrences and 10.6% (95% CI 5.5%-15.7%) rectal cancer deaths out of 141 Canadian patients. CONCLUSION: We did not detect statistically significant differences in overall survival between a Dutch and Canadian expert center with different treatment strategies. This finding needs to be further investigated in a randomized controlled trial.

EGFR and K-ras gene mutation status in squamous cell anal carcinoma: a role for concurrent radiation and EGFR inhibitors?

BACKGROUND: There is a growing appreciation for radio-sensitiser use in multi-modal cancer treatment models. Squamous cell anal carcinoma (SCAC) is a rare gastrointestinal tumour traditionally treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. Cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, has demonstrated significant efficacy when combined with radiation in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SccH&N). We wanted to assess EGFR and Kirsten-ras (K-ras) status in SCAC to see whether it compares with SccH&N. METHODS: Over 90 SCAC paraffin-embedded biopsies were mounted onto a tissue microarray and were assessed for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry. These samples were also assessed for the most frequently mutated K-ras and EGFR exons by high-resolution melting analysis. RESULTS: The EGFR was present in over 90% of samples tested. The K-ras and EGFR mutations were absent in all samples tested, although a synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism was found in 3 out of 89 samples tested for EGFR exon 19. CONCLUSION: The low rate of K-ras and EGFR mutations, coupled with the high surface expression of EGFR, suggests similarity in the EGFR signalling pathway between SCAC and SccH&N, and thus a potential role for EGFR inhibitors in SCAC. To our knowledge this is the largest cohort of invasive SCAC samples investigated for EGFR and K-ras mutations reported to date.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy do not increase radiation-induced dermatitis in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Radiation-induced dermatitis is a common side effect of breast irradiation, with hypofractionation being a well-known risk factor. In the context of the widespread adoption of hypofractionated breast radiotherapy, we evaluated the effect of hypofractionated radiotherapy on the incidence of skin toxicity in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with breast cancer treated from 2004 to 2006 at a single institution. Patients undergoing lumpectomy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions were included in the study. Using cosmetic and skin toxicity scales, all patients were evaluated weekly during treatment and at scheduled follow-up visits with the radiation oncologist. RESULTS: During the study period, 162 patients underwent radiotherapy, and 30% of those (n = 48) received chemotherapy. Radiotherapy boost to the tumour bed was more common in the chemotherapy group [n = 20 (42%)] than in the radiotherapy-alone group [n = 30 (26%)]. We observed no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to acute skin toxicity of grade 3 or higher (2.1% in the chemotherapy group vs. 4.4% in the radiation-alone group, p = 0.67) or of grades 1-2 toxicity (62.5% vs. 51.7% respectively, p = 0.23). There was also no significant difference in late grade 3 or higher skin toxicity between the groups (2.1% vs. 0% respectively, p = 0.30) or in grades 1-2 toxicity (20.8% vs. 25.5% respectively, p = 0.69). Similarly, excellent or good cosmetic result scores were similar in both groups (p = 0.80) CONCLUSIONS: In our single-institution review, we observed no adverse effects of chemotherapy in combination with hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. Further investigations are necessary to better elucidate the effects of chemotherapy on skin toxicity in the context of hypofractionated irradiation.

Massive osteolytic bone metastases from a primary aortic sarcoma: a case report.

We present an unusual case of an aortic intimal sarcoma, which originally manifested itself by the presence of extensive radiologically osteolytic lesions in the long bones of the lower limbs. The histology of these was puzzling and was first considered to represent a low grade sarcoma of vasoformative tissue and subsequently skeletal angiomatosis. Despite a good initial clinical response to disodium etidronate, the patient ultimately developed small bowel infarction and the true diagnosis only came to light at autopsy. This revealed a tumour in the lower thoracic aorta which, unusually for aortic sarcoma, consisted of loosely packed bland spindle cells with no necrosis and infrequent mitoses. Immunocytochemistry was unhelpful but electron microscopy suggested myofibroblastic differentiation. The majority of previous reports of the tumour in the literature lack information on electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry and have suggested that these tumours are generally pleomorphic in appearance. Embolic phenomena and post mortem diagnosis are usual although occasional antemortem diagnosis has been made using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning with the latter being the investigation of choice.

Volar perilunate dislocation of the carpus: a case report and elucidation of its mechanism of occurrence.

Perilunate dislocation is a rare injury. The dorsal type, in which the distal row of the carpus displaces posterior to the lunate, is more common; the volar dislocation of the carpus on the lunate is an extremely rare injury. In addition to a case report of this rare injury, a probable mechanism is described with cadaveric studies. The proposed mechanism, to the author's best knowlege, has not been reported or recognized in the English literature, previously.

Immunosuppressive potential and pathogenicity of an avian adenovirus isolate involved in hydropericardium syndrome in broilers.

The role of avian adenovirus isolate PARC-1 as an immunosuppressive agent was investigated using a Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccine immune response procedure. The immunosuppressive effect on the humoral immune response was investigated up to 21 days after inoculation with adenovirus. Infected chickens showed a serologic response to NDV that was reduced compared with that of the controls. To further investigate the effect of the virus on major lymphoid organs, the pattern of virus dissemination in various organs was studied at various time intervals after inoculation. Spleen, thymus, bursa of Fabricius, and cecal tonsils of broilers were examined using a dot-immunobinding assay. The virus was found to have a predilection for lymphoid organs, and virus from lymphoid organs was capable of producing disease when inoculated into healthy chickens. The relationship of virus predilection to its immunosuppressive effect also was studied.