Outpatient nursing case management for cardiovascular disease.

Case management has been an effective treatment model for maintaining costs while preserving quality of care for vulnerable populations who are frequent care users. Nursing case management has been effective in improving health outcomes in chronically ill populations. Specifically, nurse practitioner care has been as effective, and in some areas, more effective in managing chronic health problems of patients than care provided by physicians. Cardiovascular disease is a chronic condition, often accompanied by long-term symptoms and disability, that is prevalent in the United States population. Outpatient nursing case management for chronic health problems associated with cardiovascular disease is posited as a model for a heavily used system that maintains quality of care in this group.

Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III.

Three instruments for the assessment of quality of life, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III (QLI) were administered to 107 patients with stable angina pectoris in a longitudinal randomized trial comparing the use of alternative anginal medications in the management of chronic stable angina pectoris. This study demonstrated that differences in angina severity as measured by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC) were related to each of the SAQ subscales, to selected subscales of the SF-36, but not to the QLI. All quality of life (QOL) instruments demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability when administered over a 2-week interval. Neither the SF-36 nor the QLI were discriminative of angina severity or sensitive to changes in CCSC angina classification. Both the SAQ and QLI detected changes in heart disease related QOL over time.

Measurement of the AH and HV interval and His bundle duration: interobserver and intraobserver variation.

Conduction system intervals measured during intracardiac electrophysiologic testing influence clinical decisions. To evaluate measurement reliability, interobserver and intraobserver variation for AH, HV, and His bundle duration measurements from 50 patients were evaluated. The square of the correlation coefficient (r2) was used as the index for measurement reliability. Three investigators performed the measurements. The r2 for interobserver variation of the AH interval ranged from 0.55 to 0.68 and for intraobserver variability from 0.60 to 0.88. The standard error of measurement based on intraobserver measurements ranged from 10.2 to 18.0 ms. The r2 for interobserver variation of the HV interval ranged from 0.42 to 0.63 and for intraobserver variation from 0.489 to 0.73. The standard error of measurement was 6.2 to 9.9 ms. For the His bundle duration, the r2 for interobserver variation ranged from 0.42 to 0.52 and for intraobserver variation from 0.19 to 0.52. The standard error of measurement was 3.1 to 5.2 ms. Although there is measurement variation for AH and HV intervals, their use in conjunction with the history and the surface electrocardiogram to make clinical decisions is appropriate. His bundle duration cannot be measured reliably using the standard recording technique and should not be used for clinical decision making.