Appearance of aseptic vascular grafts after endovascular aortic repair on [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) allows for early detection of functional changes associated with infection, based on increased glucose utilization by activated macrophages and granulocytes. Aseptic vascular grafts, like all foreign bodies, can stimulate an inflammatory response, which can present as increased activity on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Consequently, distinguishing aseptic inflammation from graft infection, though important, can be difficult. In the case of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), a minimally invasive procedure involving the transfemoral insertion of an endoprosthetic stent graft, the normal postoperative appearance of these grafts on 18F-FDG PET/CT can vary over time, potentially confounding study interpretation. AIM: To investigate the visual, semiquantitative, and temporal characteristics of aseptic vascular grafts in patients status post EVAR. METHODS: In this observational retrospective cohort study, patients with history of EVAR who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for indications other than infection were identified retrospectively. All patients were asymptomatic for graft infection - no abdominal pain, fever of unknown origin, sepsis, or leukocytosis - at the time of imaging and for ≥ 2 mo after each PET/CT. Imaging studies such as CT for each patient were also reviewed, and any patients with suspected or confirmed vascular graft infection were excluded. One hundred two scans performed on 43 patients (34 males; 9 females; age = 77 ± 8 years at the time of the final PET/CT) were retrospectively reviewed. All 43 patients had an abdominal aortic (AA) vascular graft, 40 patients had a right iliac (RI) limb graft, and 41 patients had a left iliac (LI) limb graft. Twenty-two patients had 1 PET/CT and 21 patients had from 2 to 9 PET/CTs. Grafts were imaged between 2 mo to 168 mo (about 14 years) post placement. Eight grafts were imaged within 6 mo of placement, including three that were imaged within three months of placement. The mean interval between graft placement and PET/CT for all 102 scans was 51 ± 39 mo. PET/CT data was reconstructed with region-of-interest analysis of proximal, mid and distal portions of the grafts and background ascending aorta. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was recorded for each region. SUVmax-to-background uptake ratios (URs) were calculated. Visual assessment was performed using a 2-pattern grading scale: Diffuse (homogeneous uptake less than liver uptake) and focal (one or more areas of focal uptake in any part of the graft). Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: In total, there were 306 AA grafts, 285 LI grafts, 282 RI grafts, and 306 ascending aorta background SUVmax measurements. For all 102 scans, mean SUVmax values for AA grafts were 2.8-3.0 along proximal, mid, and distal segments. Mean SUVmax values for LI grafts and RI grafts were 2.7-2.8. Mean SUVmax values for background were 2.5 ± 0.5. Mean URs were 1.1-1.2. Visual analysis of the scans reflected results of quantitative analysis. On visual inspection, 98% revealed diffuse, homogeneous 18F-FDG uptake less than liver. Graft URs and visual pattern categories were significantly associated for AA graft URs (F-ratio = 21.5, P < 0.001), LI graft URs (F-ratio = 20.4, P < 0.001), and RI graft URs (F-ratio = 30.4, P < 0.001). Thus, visual patterns of 18F-FDG uptake corresponded statistically significantly to semiquantitative URs. The age of grafts showing focal patterns was greater than grafts showing diffuse patterns, 87 ± 89 vs 50 ± 37 mo, respectively (P = 0.02). URs were significantly associated with graft age for AA grafts (r = 0.19, P = 0.001). URs were also significantly associated with graft age for LI grafts (r = 0.25, P < 0.0001), and RI grafts (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Quartiles of similar numbers of graft (n = 25-27) grouped by graft age indicated that URs were significantly higher for 4th quartile vs 2nd quartile URs (F-ratio = 19.5, P < 0.001). When evaluating URs, graft SUVmax values within 10%-20% of the ascending aorta SUVmax is evident in aseptic grafts, except for grafts in the oldest quartiles. In this study, grafts in the oldest quartiles (> 7 years post EVAR) showed SUVmax up to 30% higher than the ascending aorta SUVmax. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of an aseptic vascular stent graft in the aorta and iliac vessels on 18F-FDG PET/CT include graft SUVmax values within 10%-20% of the ascending aorta background SUVmax. The SUVmax of older aseptic grafts can be as much as 30% above background. The visual uptake pattern of diffuse, homogeneous uptake less than liver was seen in 98% of aseptic vascular grafts, making this pattern particularly reassuring for clinicians.

1-hour versus 3-hour 99mTc-PYP imaging to evaluate suspected cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis.

The diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis can involve early or delayed 99mTc-pyrophosphate planar, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and/or SPECT/CT imaging. We investigated whether image interpretations differed among modalities and time points. In this observational study, data were reviewed for 173 patients with suspected transthyretin amyloidosis who underwent planar and SPECT/CT 1 and 3 hours after radiopharmaceutical injection. Planar heart-to-contralateral lung ratios were calculated. Myocardial-to-rib uptake was independently scored on SPECT and SPECT/CT as follows: 0 (negative), 1 < rib (equivocal), 2 = rib (positive), or 3 > rib (positive), and the image quality was as follows:1 (poor), 2 (adequate), and 3 (good). Three-hour SPECT/CT readings were used as the reference standard against which the other readings were compared. Twenty-five percent of patients were positive (3-hour SPECT/CT score ≥ 2). Compared to 3-hour SPECT/CT readings, there was "fair agreement" (κ = .27 - .33) with SPECT, and "fair agreement" (κ = .23 - .31) with planar imaging at 1 and 3 hours. More patients had abnormal SPECT and SPECT/CT than planar imaging (24-25% vs 16-17%, P < .007). There were more equivocal cases for 1 and 3 hours planar imaging than for 1 and 3 hours SPECT (71-73% vs 23-26%, P < .001) and 1 and 3 hours SPECT/CT (3-5%, P < .001). SPECT/CT image quality was higher at 3 hours than at 1 hour and higher than that on SPECT (P = .001). Three-hour SPECT/CT readings provided the highest number of definitive readings, had the highest image quality, and constituted the preferred protocol for evaluating unselected populations of patients that have a clinical suspicion of possible cardiac amyloidosis.

Indicators of abnormal PET coronary flow capacity in detecting cardiac ischemia.

Coronary flow capacity (CFC) categorizes severity of left ventricular (LV) ischemia by PET myocardial blood flow (MBF). Our objective was to correlate abnormal CFC with other indicators of regional ischemia. Data were examined retrospectively for 231 patients evaluated for known/suspected CAD who underwent rest and regadenoson-stress 82Rb PET/CT. MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were quantified, from which CFC was categorized as Normal CFC (1), Minimally reduced (2), Mildly reduced (3), Moderately reduced (4), and Severely reduced (5) for the three main arterial territories as well as globally. Relative perfusion summed stress score (SSS) and systolic phase contraction bandwidth (BW) were assessed. Accuracy to detect arteries with CFC ≥ 4 was highest for a Regional Index combining SSS and BW (88 ± 3%). A Global Index formed from stress ejection fraction, SSS and BW was the most accurate means of identifying patients with global CFC ≥ 4 (84 ± 3%). Arteries with abnormal CFC derived from absolute myocardial blood flow measurements are accurately identified by composite parameters combining regionally aberrant relative perfusion patterns and asynchrony.

99mTc-PYP SPECT and SPECT/CT quantitation for diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated quantitative 99mTc-pyrophosphate (PYP) SPECT/CT reproducibility and accuracy for diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and whether SPECT/CT improved visual and quantitative results compared to SPECT-only. METHODS: Data were reviewed for 318 patients with suspected ATTR who underwent PYP SPECT/CT. Myocardial-to-blood pool count (MBP) ratios were computed and repeated independently > 1 month later. A physician independently scored LV myocardial-to-rib uptake on SPECT/CT as: 0 (negative), 1 < rib (equivocal), 2 = rib (positive) or 3 > rib (positive), and the image quality as: 1 (poor), 2 (adequate), and 3 (good). SPECT-only MBP ratios and visual scores were assessed separately for a subgroup of the first sequential 191 patients. RESULTS: 25% of patients had positive myocardial uptake (myocardial-to-rib uptake score of ≥ 2). SPECT/CT MBP ratios were reproducible (1.35 ± .68 vs 1.33 ± .74, p = .09) and corresponded with visual scores ≥ 2 (ROC AUC = 99 ± 1%) more accurately than SPECT-only MBPs (93 ± 3%, p = .02). SPECT/CT image quality was better than that of SPECT-only (2.7 ± .5 vs 2.1 ± .5, p < .0001) with fewer equivocal results (2.6% vs 22.5%, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: SPECT/CT produces MBP ratios that are reproducible and accurately identify a positive scan, with better image quality and fewer equivocal cases than SPECT-only.

Clinical implications of compromised 82Rb PET data acquisition.

BACKGROUND: We wished to document the prevalence and quantitative effects of compromised 82Rb PET data acquisitions on myocardial flow reserve (MFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were analyzed retrospectively for 246 rest and regadenoson-stress studies of 123 patients evaluated for known or suspected CAD. An automated injector delivered pre-determined activities of 82Rb. Automated quality assurance algorithms identified technical problems for 7% (9/123) of patients. Stress data exhibited 2 instances of scanner saturation, 1 blood peak detection, 1 blood peak width, 1 gradual patient motion, and 2 abrupt patient motion problems. Rest data showed 1 instance of blood peak width and 2 abrupt patient motion problems. MFR was lower for patients with technical problems flagged by the quality assurance algorithms than those without technical problems (1.5 ± 0.5 versus 2.1 ± 0.7, P = 0.01), even though rest and stress ejection fraction, asynchrony and relative myocardial perfusion measures were similar for these two groups (P > 0.05), suggesting that MFR accuracy was adversely affected by technical errors. CONCLUSION: It is important to verify integrity of 82Rb data to ensure MFR computation quality.

Computational approaches to detect small lesions in 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans.

PURPOSE: When physicians interpret 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans, they rely on their subjective visual impression of the presence of small lesions, the criteria for which may vary among readers. Our investigation used physical phantom scans to evaluate whether image texture analysis metrics reliably correspond to visual criteria used to identify lesions and accurately differentiate background regions from sub-centimeter simulated lesions. METHODS: Routinely collected quality assurance test data were processed retrospectively for 65 different 18 F-FDG PET scans performed of standardized phantoms on eight different PET/CT systems. Phantoms included 8-, 12-, 16-, and 25-mm diameter cylinders embedded in a cylindrical water bath, prepared with 2.5:1 activity-to-background ratio emulating typical whole-body PET protocols. Voxel values in cylinder regions and background regions were sampled to compute several classes of image metrics. Two experienced physicists, blinded to quantified image metrics and to each other's readings, independently graded cylinder visibility on a 5-level scale (0 = definitely not visible to 4 = definitely visible). RESULTS: The three largest cylinders were visible in 100% of cases with a mean visibility score of 3.3 ± 1.2, while the smallest 8-mm cylinder was visible in 58% of cases with a significantly lower mean visibility score of 1.5±1.1 (P < 0.0001). By ROC analysis, the polynomial-fit signal-to-noise ratio was the most accurate at discriminating 8-mm cylinders from the background, with accuracy greater than visual detection (93% ± 2% versus 76% ± 4%, P = 0.0001), and better sensitivity (94% versus 58%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Image texture analysis metrics are more sensitive than visual impressions for detecting sub-centimeter simulated lesions. Therefore, image texture analysis metrics are potentially clinically useful for 18 F-FDG PET/CT studies.

Comparison and validation of automated scoring of SPECT phantom cold rod visibility.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of phantom image quality is an integral component of the quality assurance of SPECT systems. This evaluation often is done by visual assessment of the resolution of known structures of a specified size, such as arrays of cold rods in a warm background. Although this method is rapid and convenient, it is qualitative and is subject to inter- and intraobserver variability. Thus an automated quantitative analysis would be preferable. Several metrics of cold rod visibility have been developed, although their suitability for SPECT quality assurance depends on how well they correspond to visual scoring by experienced observers. METHODS: Various metrics of cold rod visibility, derived from either texture analysis or template-based analysis, were investigated. The texture analysis methods measured the normalized gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) energy ("Energy%") and entropy ("Entropy%") of each region and an associated combination of the two ("EnergyEntropy%"). One template-based method measured the rods-to-background contrast ("Contrast") and an associated visibility index (Contrast × area = "Contrast Visibility"). Another template-based method performed binary classification (BC) of the rods and background to compute the area under curve (AUC) of its receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve ("BC-AUC") and the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio ("BC-SNR"). All these metrics were computed for 90 SPECT acquisitions of the standard American College of Radiology ("Jaszczak") phantom. Cold rod visibility was scored independently by two experienced nuclear medicine physicists on both dichotomous and 5-point scales. Scoring was performed twice by each observer to evaluate variability. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa statistic) was 0.78, and intraobserver reproducibility was 0.86 and 0.88, respectively, for each observer. Mean and median scores differed significantly between observers. Accuracy of each metric was assessed according to AUC of ROC analysis with respect to mean dichotomous score. The binary classification metrics had the highest accuracy (BC-AUC = 0.995, BC-SNR = 0.994), above that of the texture analysis metrics (Entropy% = 0.992, Energy% = 0.988, EnergyEntropy% = 0.992) and conventional template analysis (Contrast = 0.984, Contrast Visibility = 0.989). The metrics were similar in terms of rank correlation to mean visibility score. BC-AUC correlated linearly with mean visibility score (R2  = 0.95) and consistently performed among the highest of the metrics vs rod diameter and count level. CONCLUSIONS: Automated quantitative analysis of SPECT phantom cold rods correlated well with visual scoring. The metrics based on binary classification performed particularly well for this task, across the range of rod diameters and count levels. The suboptimal interobserver agreement highlights the importance of developing automated algorithms for evaluating scanner performance.

Early onset of left ventricular regional asynchrony in arteries with sub-clinical stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Asynchrony has been reported to be a marker of ischemic-induced left ventricular dysfunction, the magnitude of which correlates with extent of epicardial coronary disease. We wished to determine whether normal-appearing arterial territories with mild degrees of asynchrony have lower 82Rb PET absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and/or lower myocardial flow reserve (MFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were examined retrospectively for 105 patients evaluated for known/suspected CAD who underwent rest/regadenoson-stress 82Rb PET/CT and quantitative coronary angiography. Rest and stress absolute MBF and MFR were quantified from first-pass 82Rb PET curves. Regional relative myocardial perfusion summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), regional phase bandwidth (BW), and regional semi-quantitative asynchrony visual scores of (Asynch) were assessed. We found that in apparently normal arteries (SSS < 4, SRS < 4 and stenosis < 70%), those with abnormally low MFR < 2.0 compared to those with MFR ≥ 2.0 had larger phase BW (186 ± 79° vs 158 ± 67°, P = .02), and more visually apparent Asynch (5.7 ± 4.2 vs 3.9 ± 3.6, P = .02), which was associated with increasing stenosis values (ρ = 0.44, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: A subgroup of coronary territories with normal relative perfusion and normal or non-obstructive coronary disease may have reduced MFR, which is signaled physiologically by a mild degree of left ventricular asynchrony.

Approach to Protecting Patients and Staff in Nuclear Cardiology Laboratories in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered all aspects of performing medical procedures throughout the world. It is important to stratify patients into categories according to the likelihood that a requested exam will result in a change in acute management. Health care staff should maintain adequate distancing and engage in frequent hand washing, and personnel who are patient-facing should put on PPE at all times. All patient-touching apparatus should be disinfected between patients according to the Infection Control protocols of the institutions. Most labs have chosen to have patients wear surgical masks to afford some level of protection for them. Efforts should be implemented to enable remote reading and remote reporting of study results. The guidelines presented in this paper are based on the currently available information regarding SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) viral infections, but it is essential that all laboratories comply with evolving recommendations of their institutions and public health authorities.

Relationship of 82Rb PET territorial myocardial asynchrony to arterial stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: 82Rb PET/CT rest/regadenoson-stress data enable quantification of left ventricular rest and stress function, perfusion, and asynchrony. Our study was conducted to determine which parameters best identify patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD) and individual stenosed arteries. METHODS: PET/CT data were reviewed retrospectively for 105 patients referred for evaluation of CAD, who also underwent angiography. % arterial stenosis was determined quantitatively at a core laboratory. Severe stenosis was defined as ≥ 70%, and MVD as 2 or more stenosed arteries. Segmental MBF was calculated from first-pass data for arterial territories. Regional rest and stress systolic and diastolic asynchrony (Asynch) scores were determined from visual examination of phase polar maps. RESULTS: 65 vessels had stenoses ≥ 70%. 15 patients had MVD. ROC area under curve (ROC AUC) for identifying patients with MVD was 83% for Asynch and 73% for MFR. ROC AUC for identifying individual arterial territories with stenoses ≥ 70% was 81% and 72% for Asynch and MFR. CONCLUSION: 82Rb PET/CT accurately identified patients with MVD and individual stenosed territories, with regional asynchrony measurements contributing significantly to identify patients with CAD.

Texture analysis for automated evaluation of Jaszczak phantom SPECT system tests.

PURPOSE: Routine quarterly quality assurance (QA) assessment of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems includes analysis of multipurpose phantoms containing spheres and rods of various sizes. When evaluated by accreditation agencies, criteria applied to assess image quality are largely subjective. Determining a quantified image characteristic metric that emulates human reader impressions of image quality could be quite useful. Our investigation was conducted to ascertain whether image texture analysis metrics, such as those applied to PET scans to detect neoplasms, could prove helpful in linking qualitative statements of phantom sphere and rod visibility to quantified parameters. Because it is not obvious whether it is preferable to submit reconstructions to accrediting agencies performed using typical clinical (CLIN) protocol processing parameters or to follow agencies' filtered backprojection (FBP) suggestions, we applied texture analysis metrics to determine the degree to which these choices affect equipment capability assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were processed retrospectively for 125 different Tc-99 m SPECT scans of standardized phantoms for 14 rotating Anger detector systems as part of routine quarterly QA. Algorithms were written to compute several classes of image metrics: quantile curve metrics, image texture analysis gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) metrics, contrast metrics, and count histogram metrics. For qualitative image scores, two experienced physicists independently graded sphere and rod visibility on a 5-level scale and assigned dichotomous visibility scores, without knowledge of quantified texture analysis metrics or each other's readings. The same phantom was used to collect 15 additional data sets with two dual-detector SPECT/CT systems, reconstructed both by FBP parameters that have been suggested by accrediting agencies and by manufacturers' default settings for CLIN SPECT/CT bone imaging protocols by ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), incorporating attenuation correction using the CT scan. Image characteristics metrics were compared for FBP and CLIN reconstructions. RESULTS: For spheres, the metric with the strongest rank correlation with 5-level scale readings was the quantile curve slope (ρ = 0.83, P < 0.0001), while for rods it was GLCM Energy normalized to the maximum GLCM Energy value (EnergyNorm) (ρ = -0.88, P < 0.0001). Compared to dichotomous readings, the metric with the highest ROC area under curve (AUC) for spheres was the quantile curve slopes (AUC = 96 ± 1%, sensitivity = 91%, specificity = 90%), and for rods was EnergyNorm (AUC = 98 ± 1%, sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 95%). Image contrast was higher for all sphere sizes and rod EnergyNorm was lower for sectors of intermediate-sized rods for FBP compared to CLIN reconstructions, in agreement with more rods judged to be visible from FBP than CLIN reconstructions (47% vs 33%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: When preparing to submit quality assurance images of standardized phantoms to accrediting agencies, a reliable gauge of sphere and rod visibility can be predicted accurately using quantified reader-independent image texture analysis metrics, which also provide a useful basis for choosing among alternative image reconstruction options.

2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging-Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness, Part 2: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection.

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure to clinical personnel. While the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. ACC leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. "Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging - Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness" is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. "Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology" addresses radiation physics, dosimetry and detrimental biologic effects. "Part II: Radiologic Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection" covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy). For each modality, it includes the determinants of radiation exposure and techniques to minimize exposure to both patients and to medical personnel.

2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging-Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness, Part 1: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways Developed in Collaboration With Mended Hearts.

The stimulus to create this document was the recognition that ionizing radiation-guided cardiovascular procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, leading to greater patient radiation exposure and, potentially, to greater exposure for clinical personnel. Although the clinical benefit of these procedures is substantial, there is concern about the implications of medical radiation exposure. The American College of Cardiology leadership concluded that it is important to provide practitioners with an educational resource that assembles and interprets the current radiation knowledge base relevant to cardiovascular procedures. By applying this knowledge base, cardiovascular practitioners will be able to select procedures optimally, and minimize radiation exposure to patients and to clinical personnel. Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness is a comprehensive overview of ionizing radiation use in cardiovascular procedures and is published online. To provide the most value to our members, we divided the print version of this document into 2 focused parts. Part I: Radiation Physics and Radiation Biology addresses the issue of medical radiation exposure, the basics of radiation physics and dosimetry, and the basics of radiation biology and radiation-induced adverse effects. Part II: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection covers the basics of operation and radiation delivery for the 3 cardiovascular imaging modalities (x-ray fluoroscopy, x-ray computed tomography, and nuclear scintigraphy) and will be published in the next issue of the Journal.