Continuous EEG Monitoring Predicts a Clinically Meaningful Recovery Among Adult Inpatients.

PURPOSE: Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is primarily used for diagnosing seizures and status epilepticus, and for prognostication after cardiorespiratory arrest. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cEEG could predict survival and meaningful recovery. METHODS: The authors reviewed inpatient cEEG reports obtained between January 2013 and November 2015 and recorded demographics, preadmission modified Rankin Scale, history of preexisting epilepsy, Glasgow Coma Scale for those admitted to the intensive care unit, and EEG data (posterior dominant rhythm, reactivity, epileptiform discharges, seizures, and status epilepticus). Associations between clinical outcomes (death vs. survival or clinically meaningful recovery [inpatient rehabilitation, home-based rehabilitation, or home] vs. other [death, skilled nursing facility]) and cEEG findings were assessed with logistic regression models. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: For 218 cEEG reports (197 intensive care unit admits), the presence of at least a unilateral posterior dominant rhythm was associated with survival (odds ratio for death, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.77; P = 0.01) and with a clinically meaningful outcome (odds ratio, 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-5.93; P < 0.001); posterior dominant rhythm remained significant after adjusting for preadmission disability. Those with preexisting epilepsy had better odds of a meaningful recovery (odds ratio, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.34-8.17; P = 0.001). Treated seizures and status epilepticus were not associated with a worse mortality (P = 0.6) or disposition (P = 0.6). High Glasgow Coma Scale (≥12) at intensive care unit admission was associated with a clinically meaningful recovery (odds ratio, 16.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-170.19; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous EEG findings can be used to prognosticate survival and functional recovery, and provide guidance in establishing goals of care.

Traumatic and Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Owing to the aging of the population in the United States, it is anticipated that injury mechanisms, treatment, and outcomes of spinal cord injuries (SCI) will change. There is a scarcity of literature on nontraumatic SCI. Our goal in this study was to evaluate the causes, management, complications, and outcomes after SCI. METHODS: In a retrospective review, patients with traumatic and nontraumatic SCI admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation unit at a level 1 trauma center from 2003 to 2013 were reviewed. RESULTS: In all, 757 entries were identified, and 685 unique patients met our inclusion criteria; 17.4% were <35 years of age, 51.7% were 35 to 64 years of age, and 30.9% were at least 65 years old. The young adults had the highest proportion of fractures (60.5%) and subluxations (21.8%), whereas the oldest group had the highest rates of stenosis (35.4%), spondylotic myelopathy (16.5%), and cancer (15.1%). In SCI patients <35 years of age, 66.6% of injuries were caused by traumatic mechanisms of injury compared with 30.2% in the geriatric cohort. In the total of all SCI, 61.6% were nontraumatic. Surgical management was more prevalent with increasing age (58.8%, 73.7%, 82.1% from youngest to oldest group), as were overall rates of complications (58.6%, 59.4%, 66.7%). Mortality rates significantly increased with age (2.5%, 18.9%, 40.6% overall mortality rates in the 3 age groups). The overall mortality rate in nontraumatic SCI patients was 27.7% compared with 14.8% in traumatic SCI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Falls caused significantly more SCIs than expected, but most SCIs were predominantly nontraumatic in cause. The epidemiology of SCI is shifting rapidly.