Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Problem that Sounds the Alarm.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is affecting more and more individuals over time. The importance of the increased prevalence is enhanced by the close association with the increased risk of poor individual outcomes such as death, fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events and progression to end stage kidney disease (ESKD). ESKD requires replacement treatment such as hemodialysis (HD), a particular and complex context that unfortunately has been rarely considered in observational studies in the last few decades. The current perspective of HD as a bridge to kidney transplant requires greater attention from observational and experimental research both in the prevention and treatment of CV events in ESKD patients. We present a narrative review by performing a literature review to extrapolate the most significant articles exploring the CV risk, in particular coronary artery disease (CAD), in ESKD and evaluating possible innovative diagnostic and therapeutic tools in these patients. The risk of CAD increases linearly when the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declines and reached the most significant level in ESKD patients. Several diagnostic techniques have been evaluated to predict CAD in ESKD such as laboratory tests (Troponin-T, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, alkaline phosphatase), echocardiography and imaging techniques for vascular calcifications evaluation. Similarly, treatment is based on lifestyle changes, medical therapy and invasive techniques such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Unfortunately in the literature there are no clear indications of the usefulness and validity of biomarkers and possible treatments in ESKD patients. Considering the ESKD weight in terms of prevalence and costs it is necessary to implement clinical research in order to develop prognostic reliable biomarkers for CV and CAD risk prediction, in patients with ESKD. It should be highlighted that HD is a peculiar setting that offers the opportunity to implement research and facilitates patient monitoring by favoring the design of clinical trials.

Effect of dialysate sodium concentration on interdialytic increase of potassium.

To evaluate the role of plasma tonicity in the postdialysis increment of plasma potassium (p[K(+)]), the outcome of two hemodiafiltration treatments that differed only in the Na(+) level in dialysate (Na(D))-143 mmol/L (high dialysate sodium concentration [H-Na(D)]) and 138 mmol/L (low dialysate sodium concentration [L-Na(D)])-were compared in the same group of uremic patients from the end of treatment (T0) to the subsequent 30 to 120 min and up to 68 h. Kt/V and intradialytic K(+) removal were comparable. At T0, plasma [Na(+)] was 145+/-1 and 137+/-1 mmol/L after H-Na(D) and L-Na(D), respectively (P<0.001). The difference in plasma tonicity persisted from T0 to T68 h. At T120, p[K(+)] was increased from the T0 value of 3.7+/-0.2 to 4.7+/-0.2 mmol/L (P<0.05) after H-Na(D), whereas it was unchanged after L-Na(D). The change of p[K(+)] was still different after 68 h (+76+/-10% and +50+/-7% in H-Na(D) and L-Na(D), respectively; P<0.05). Of note, in the first 2 h after the end of treatment, bioimpedance analysis revealed only in H-Na(D) a significant 11+/-3% decrement of phase angle that is compatible with a decrease of intracellular fluid volume at the expense of the extracellular volume. Similarly, within the same time frame, in H-Na(D), a significant reduction of mean corpuscular volume of red cells, associated with a 2 +/-1% decrease of the intracellular [K(+)], was observed. In contrast, mean corpuscular volume of red cells did not change and erythrocyte [K(+)] increased by 6+/-1% after L-Na(D) (P<0.005 versus H-Na(D)). Thus, hypertonicity significantly contributes to the increase of p[K(+)] throughout the whole interdialytic period by determining intracellular fluid volume/extracellular volume redistribution of water and K(+).