Reliability, validity, sensitivity and internal consistency of the ICF based Basic Mobility Scale for measuring the mobility of patients with musculoskeletal problems in the acute hospital setting: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of mobility is important in the acute care setting. Existing tests suffer from limitations. The aim of the study was to examine the inter-rater reliability, the validity, the sensitivity to change, and the internal consistency of an ICF based scale. METHODS: In a prospective study inpatients in the acute care setting with restricted mobility aged above 50 years assigned to rehabilitative treatment were included. Assessment of subscales of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the ICF based Basic Mobility Scale (BMS) were performed at admission and before discharge. Furthermore pain, length of stay in hospital, and post-discharge residential status were recorded. Inter-rater reliability, criterion-concurrent validity, sensitivity to change, and internal consistency were calculated. Furthermore, floor and ceiling effects were determined. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients (79 women/46 men) were included. The BMS showed an excellent inter-rater reliability for the total BMS (ICC BMS: 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.81-0.88). The criterion-concurrent validity was high to excellent (Spearman correlation coefficient: -0.91 in correlation to FIM) and the internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha 0.88). The BMS proved to be sensitive to improvements in mobility (Wilcoxon's signed rank test: p < 0.0001; The effect size for the BMS was 1.075 and the standardized response mean 1.10. At admission, the BMS was less vulnerable to floor effects. CONCLUSIONS: The BMS may be used as a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of mobility in the acute care setting. It is easy to apply, sensitive to change during the hospital stay and not vulnerable to floor and ceiling effects.

Calcific trochanteric bursitis: resolution of calcifications and clinical remission with non-invasive treatment. A case report.

Calcific trochanteric bursitis, a common regional pain syndrome, is characterized by chronic, intermittent aching pain over the lateral aspect of the hip and limitation of function. Effective treatment is invasive, including infiltration therapy and surgical intervention. The therapeutic effects of conservative treatment modalities have not been proven. A 59-year-old woman presented at the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation with a 2-year history of pain in the right hip. She had been treated with several agents such as glucocorticoids and local anesthetics (via injection) for two years, but without success. Physical examination revealed the clinical diagnosis of bursitis trochanterica. Radiographic findings showed calcified rounded masses measuring about 1.5 cm in diameter around the greater trochanter; a calcific bursitis trochanterica was diagnosed. The patient presented for conservative treatment in order to avoid surgical intervention for removing the calcification and the bursal sac. A non-invasive treatment regimen including intensive pulsed ultrasound therapy, physiotherapy and iontophoresis was started. The conservative treatment led to a remission of both, symptoms as well as radiographic findings, which revealed complete resolution of calcifications. This case report shows that, in cases of calcific trochanteric bursitis (including those with extensive calcifications), a non-invasive conservative treatment regimen including intensive high-dosed pulsed ultrasound therapy should be attempted before more invasive treatment (injections, surgery) is considered.

Long-term outcome after treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis with exercise and manual therapy.

In a previous study, exercise and manual therapy demonstrated a 90% success rate in patients with osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joints in the short-term. The aim of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term effect of these treatment modalities. Seventeen patients were evaluated. All patients suffered from osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joints with pain in the temporomandibular joint at baseline and were treated successfully in a prior short-term study. The parameters were pain at rest and at chewing, impairment in daily life, and mouth opening. At follow-up, 11 patients (65%) experienced no pain and 13 patients (76%) had no pain at rest (Fisher's Exact Test: p<0.02). Thirteen patients (76%) had a normal incisal edge clearance, and ten patients (59%) felt no impairment due to the disease (Fisher's Exact Test: p=0.01). Thirteen patients (76%), who had been treated once successfully, have not needed treatment within the three years after cessation of their therapy. Exercise therapy is an effective tool to treat osteoarthrosis of the temporomandibular joints.

Pulsed magnetic field therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee--a double-blind sham-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Pulsed magnetic field therapy is frequently used to treat the symptoms of osteoarthritis, although its efficacy has not been proven. We conducted a randomized, double-blind comparison of pulsed magnetic field and sham therapy in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients were assigned to receive 84 sessions, each with a duration of 30 minutes, of either pulsed magnetic field or sham treatment. Patients administered the treatment on their own at home, twice a day for six weeks. RESULTS: According to a sample size estimation, 36 consecutive patients were enrolled. 34 patients completed the study, two of whom had to be excluded from the statistical analysis, as they had not applied the PMF sufficiently. Thus, 15 verum and 17 sham-treated patients were enrolled in the statistical analysis. After six weeks of treatment the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index was reduced in the pulsed magnetic field-group from 84.1 (+/- 45.1) to 49.7 (+/- 31.6), and from 73.7 (+/- 43.3) to 66.9 (+/- 52.9) in the sham-treated group (p = 0.03). The following secondary parameters improved in the pulsed magnetic field group more than they did in the sham group: gait speed at fast walking [+6.0 meters per minute (1.6 to 10.4) vs. -3.2 (-8.5 to 2.2)], stride length at fast walking [+6.9 cm (0.2 to 13.7) vs. -2.9 (-8.8 to 2.9)], and acceleration time in the isokinetic dynamometry strength tests [-7.0% (-15.2 to 1.3) vs. 10.1% (-0.3 to 20.6)]. CONCLUSION: In patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee, PMF treatment can reduce impairment in activities of daily life and improve knee function.

[Optimizing electrotherapy--a comparative study of 3 different currents]. / Optimierung der Schwellstrombehandlung--eine Vergleichsstudie von drei unterschiedlichen Stromformen.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation can be used to increase strength of skeletal muscle. In neuromuscular electrical stimulation of innervated skeletal muscle, the application of the highest possible intensities of electricity is an important determinant of therapeutic success with regard to strength training. The therapeutic goal of "strengthening muscles" is opposed to the side effect of discomfort through the application of electricity. The aim of the present study was to compare three forms of electric current with respect to subjective tolerance and maximum achievable muscular strength. Twenty-nine healthy male volunteers were included in a single-blind study in which three forms of electric current were applied in a randomized fashion. The following types were compared: a short monophasic form, a biphasic form that was twice as long in terms of impulse duration, and a long monophasic form with an equal impulse duration than tht of the biphasic form and with an impulse form that corresponded to the short monophasic current. Stimulation was administered via surface electrodes placed on the knee extensors in the lower extremity on the right side. The intensity of the current was increased to the individual limit of tolerance or to a maximum of 100 mA. The main target parameter used to determine the success of treatment was the maximum electrically induced strength as a percentage of maximal voluntary contraction. The short monophasic form of electricity was associated with much less discomfort than the long monophasic and biphasic forms (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0062). Furthermore, the biphasic form was better tolerated (and therefore had a larger therapeutic range of application) than the long monophasic form (p = 0.041). The biphasic and long monophasic forms produced higher values for maximum electrically induced strength than did the short monophasic form (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0010). To summarize: the biphasic form had a larger range of therapeutic application than the long monophasic form. Furthermore, the biphasic form produced 40% more electrically induced strength than the short monophasic one. It may be concluded that, in terms of therapeutic application, the biphasic form of electric current is superior to the monophasic forms described in the present study.