Intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in the Veneto region: the gap between eligibility and reality.

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the treatment of choice for most patients with acute ischemic stroke. According to the recently updated guidelines, IVT should be administered in absence of absolute exclusion criteria. We aimed to assess the proportion of ischemic strokes potentially eligible and actually treated with IVT, and to explore the reasons for not administering IVT. We prospectively collected and analyzed data from 1184 consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted to the 22 Stroke Units (SUs) of the Veneto region from September 18th to December 10th 2017. Patients were treated with IVT according to the current Italian guidelines. For untreated patients, the reasons for not administering IVT were reported by each center in a predefined model including absolute and/or relative exclusion criteria and other possible reasons. Out of 841 (71%) patients who presented within 4.5 h of stroke onset, 704 (59%) had no other absolute exclusion criteria and were therefore potentially eligible for IVT according to the current guidelines. However, only 323 (27%) patients were eventually treated with IVT. Among 861 (73%) untreated patients, 480 had at least one absolute exclusion criterion, 283 only relative exclusion criteria, 56 only other reasons, and 42 a combination of relative exclusion criteria and other reasons. Our study showed that only 46% (323/704) of the potentially eligible patients were actually treated with IVT in the SUs of the Veneto region. All healthcare professionals involved in the acute stroke pathway should make an effort to bridge this gap between eligibility and reality.

Muscle histopathology in upper motor neuron-dominant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The distinction between primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) still remains debated. Recently, PLS patients displaying lower motor neuron (LMN) signs have been defined as 'upper motor neuron (UMN)-dominant ALS', using 'clinically pure PLS' diagnosis to those with no LMN signs. To further characterize the LMN involvement in UMN-dominant ALS we investigated the presence and the extent of neurogenic abnormalities in the skeletal muscle of patients affected with a pyramidal syndrome consistent with UMN-dominant ALS. A total of nine patients affected with UMN-dominant ALS were analysed. In all cases, muscle biopsies showed the presence of scattered or clustered atrophic angulated fibres in small groups, and a mild to moderate fibre type-grouping. Target and targetoid fibres were detected in two cases only. Three patients had a second muscle biopsy which demonstrated a roughly unchanged pattern of chronic denervation with still moderate reinnervation phenomena. This study suggests that in UMN-dominant ALS muscle denervation may be characterized by an early chronic impairment of a restricted number of LMNs. The extent rather than the presence of LMN signs may allow to categorize patients with motor neuron disease involving mainly UMN into distinct entities.