Midterm and Long-Term Outcomes following Dedicated Endovenous Nitinol Stent Placement for Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: Three- to 5-Year Results of the VIRTUS Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the midterm patency and long-term safety of placement of a dedicated venous stent (Vici Venous Stent System) for the treatment of venous lesions of the iliofemoral outflow tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unilateral obstructive disease of the iliofemoral veins and a Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological class of 3 or higher or a Venous Clinical Severity Score of 2 or greater were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, single-arm study at 23 sites in the United States and Europe. The patients were followed up for 36 months after the index procedure for the assessment of patency and up to 60 months for the assessment of safety. The clinical outcomes in 11 patients with a stent fracture were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients enrolled in 2 cohorts (ie, feasibility cohort, n = 30; pivotal cohort, n = 170) were combined for this analysis. The overall 36-month primary patency rate was 71.7% (86/120), and the 36-month primary patency rate was 96.4% (27/28) for the nonthrombotic group and 64.1% (59/92) for the postthrombotic group. The freedom from major adverse events was 81.2% (53/65) through 60 months. The 60-month Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 84.3%. In 9 of the 11 patients who had a stent fracture (1 patient with nonthrombotic etiology and 10 patients with postthrombotic etiology) identified at 12 months, the stents extended into the common femoral vein. The TVR rates and clinical outcomes were similar between patients with and without a stent fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the VIRTUS study demonstrated good midterm patency and long-term safety following the placement of a dedicated venous stent for iliofemoral obstruction.

The Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology classification of pelvic venous disorders: A report of the American Vein & Lymphatic Society International Working Group on Pelvic Venous Disorders.

[Box: see text]With the support of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Vein & Lymphatic Society, the American Venous Forum, the Canadian Society of Phlebology, the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, the European Venous Forum, the International Pelvic Pain Society, the International Union of Phlebology, the Korean Society of Interventional Radiology, the Society of Interventional Radiology, and the Society for Vascular Surgery.

The Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology classification of pelvic venous disorders: A report of the American Vein & Lymphatic Society International Working Group on Pelvic Venous Disorders.

As the importance of pelvic venous disorders (PeVD) has been increasingly recognized, progress in the field has been limited by the lack of a valid and reliable classification instrument. Misleading historical nomenclature, such as the May-Thurner, pelvic congestion, and nutcracker syndromes, often fails to recognize the interrelationship of many pelvic symptoms and their underlying pathophysiology. Based on a perceived need, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel charged with the development of a discriminative classification instrument for PeVD. This instrument, the Symptoms-Varices-Pathophysiology ("SVP") classification for PeVD, includes three domains-Symptoms (S), Varices (V), and Pathophysiology (P), with the pathophysiology domain encompassing the Anatomic (A), Hemodynamic (H), and Etiologic (E) features of the patient's disease. An individual patient's classification is designated as SVPA,H,E. For patients with pelvic origin lower extremity signs or symptoms, the SVP instrument is complementary to and should be used in conjunction with the Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic (CEAP) classification. The SVP instrument accurately defines the diverse patient populations with PeVD, an important step in improving clinical decision making, developing disease-specific outcome measures and identifying homogenous patient populations for clinical trials.

Endovascular Treatment for Venous Diseases: Where are the Venous Stents?

There is a growing need for dedicated endovascular devices to treat pathologies affecting the venous system. However, because of a lack of research into venous diseases and treatments, the optimal design, material, and mechanical properties of venous stents remain unknown. Development of the ideal venous stent should be based on a thorough understanding of the underlying venous pathology. There are multiple venous diseases that differ from each other depending on their location (iliocaval, superior vena cava), mechanism (thrombotic versus nonthrombotic lesions), and chronicity. Thus, it is likely that stent material, design, and features should differ according to each underlying disease. From a mechanical point of view, the success of a venous stent hinges on its ability to resist crushing (which requires high global and local radial rigidity) and to match with the compliant implant environment (which requires high flexibility). Device oversizing, textile coverage, and drug coating are additional features that should be considered in the context of venous diseases rather than directly translated from the arterial world. This review examines the unique forces affecting venous stents, the problems with using arterial devices to treat venous pathologies, preliminary results of a study comparing crush resistance of commercially available laser-cut stents with a novel braided stent design, and its applicability to venous interventions.

Associated Da Vinci and magellan robotic systems for successful treatment of nutcracker syndrome.

Here, we report the case of a 26-year-old woman suffering from nutcracker syndrome with concurrent disabling pelvic congestion syndrome. She was given the minimally invasive treatment of left renal vein transposition with the Da Vinci(®) robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), followed the next day by a gonadal vein and pelvic varicose embolization using a robotic intraluminal navigation with the Magellan™ robotic system (Hansen Medical, Mountain View, CA). The procedure was uneventful, and the patient had good results at 6 months of follow-up, including a patent left renal vein and complete relief of symptoms.

Staged procedure to prevent major adverse events in extensive aortic aneurysm repair.

Surgical management of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity, including spinal cord ischemia. We report a successful three-stage repair combining open and endovascular surgery in a patient presenting with an ascending, arch, and thoracoabdominal aneurysm. Spinal cord protective measures included a staged approach, preserved antegrade flow to the left subclavian and hypogastric arteries, absence of aortic cross-clamping, and aggressive perioperative hemodynamic monitoring.