Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eval Health Prof ; 22(4): 427-41, 1999 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10623399

RESUMO

The authors randomly selected 400 physicians from a population of 1,545 practicing physicians providing follow-up care to patients who received bone marrow or blood stem cell transplants at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center to determine interest in receiving Internet-based transplant information. In a two-factor completely randomized factorial design, the 400 physicians were assigned to receive mailed surveys with either no compensation or a $5 check and either no follow-up call or a follow-up call 3 weeks after mailing. Overall, 51.5% of the physicians returned the mailed surveys. Comparison of logit models showed that inclusion of a $5 check in the mailer significantly (p = .016) increased the probability of returning the surveys (57.5% vs. 45.5%). In contrast, the telephone follow-up had no overall effect. The authors concluded a modest financial reward can significantly improve physician response rates to research surveys but a telephone follow-up may be inefficient and even ineffective.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Motivação , Médicos/psicologia , Pesquisa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Serviços de Informação , Internet , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Órgãos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA