RESUMO
AIM: Six modern PGx assays were compared with the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB) to determine the proportion of the currently known PGx genotypes that are assessed by these assays. MATERIALS & METHODS: Investigated assays were 'Ion AmpliSeq Pharmacogenomics', 'iPLEX PGx Pro', 'DMET Plus,' 'PharmcoScan,' 'Living DNA' and '23andMe.' RESULTS: PharmGKB contains 3474 clinical annotations of which 75, 70 and 45% can be determined by PharmacoScan, Living DNA and 23andMe, respectively. The other assays are designed to test a specific subset of PGx variants. CONCLUSION: Assaying all known PGx variants would only comprise a minor fraction of the current assays' capacity. Unfortunately, this is not achieved. Moreover, not necessarily the variants with the highest effects or the highest evidence are selected.
Assuntos
Bases de Conhecimento , Farmacogenética/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Farmacogenômicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Genótipo , HumanosRESUMO
Even though radiography is one of the most frequently used imaging techniques for orthopaedic disorders, it has been demonstrated that the interpretation can vary between assessors. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine the intraobserver and interobserver agreement and the influence of level of expertise on the interpretation of radiographs of the stifle in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR). Sixteen observers, divided in four groups according to their level of experience, evaluated 30 radiographs (15 cases with CCLR and 15 control stifles) twice. Each observer was asked to evaluate joint effusion, presence and location of degenerative joint disease, joint instability and whether CCLR was present or absent. Overall, intraobserver and interobserver agreement ranged from fair to almost perfect with a trend towards increased agreement for more experienced observers. Additionally, it was found that stifles that were classified with high agreement have either overt disease characteristics or no disease characteristics at all, in comparison to the ones that are classified with a low agreement. Overall, the agreement on radiographic interpretation of CCLR was high, which is important, as it is the basis of a correct diagnosis and treatment.